Skip to main content
medRxiv
  • Home
  • About
  • Submit
  • ALERTS / RSS
Advanced Search

Novel mammogram-based measures improve breast cancer risk prediction beyond an established measure of mammographic density

Tuong L. Nguyen, Daniel F. Schmidt, Enes Makalic, Gertraud Maskarinec, View ORCID ProfileShuai Li, Gillian Dite, Ye K. Aung, Christopher F. Evans, Ho N. Trinh, Laura Baglietto, Jennifer Stone, Yun-Mi Song, Joohon Sung, Robert J. MacInnis, Pierre-Antoine Dugué, James G. Dowty, Mark A. Jenkins, Roger L. Milne, Melissa C. Southey, Graham G. Giles, John L. Hopper
doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.05.24.20111815
Tuong L. Nguyen
1Centre for Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, University of Melbourne, 207 Bouverie Street, Parkville, Victoria 3010, Australia
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Daniel F. Schmidt
2Faculty of Information Technology, Monash University, Clayton, Victoria, Australia
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Enes Makalic
1Centre for Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, University of Melbourne, 207 Bouverie Street, Parkville, Victoria 3010, Australia
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Gertraud Maskarinec
3University of Hawaii Cancer Center, Honolulu, Hawaii, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Shuai Li
1Centre for Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, University of Melbourne, 207 Bouverie Street, Parkville, Victoria 3010, Australia
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Shuai Li
Gillian Dite
1Centre for Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, University of Melbourne, 207 Bouverie Street, Parkville, Victoria 3010, Australia
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Ye K. Aung
1Centre for Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, University of Melbourne, 207 Bouverie Street, Parkville, Victoria 3010, Australia
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Christopher F. Evans
1Centre for Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, University of Melbourne, 207 Bouverie Street, Parkville, Victoria 3010, Australia
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Ho N. Trinh
1Centre for Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, University of Melbourne, 207 Bouverie Street, Parkville, Victoria 3010, Australia
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Laura Baglietto
4Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, University of Pisa, Italy
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Jennifer Stone
5Curtin UWA Centre for Genetic Origins of Health and Disease, Curtin University and the University of Western Australia, Perth, Western WA, 6009, Australia
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Yun-Mi Song
6Department of Family Medicine, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Irwon-ro 81, Gangnamgu, Seoul, South Korea
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Joohon Sung
7Department of Epidemiology School of Public Health, Seoul National University, 1 Gwanak-ro, Gwanak-gu, 151-742 Seoul, South Korea
8Institute of Health and Environment, Seoul National University, 1 Gwanak-ro, Gwanak-gu, 151-742 Seoul, South Korea
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Robert J. MacInnis
1Centre for Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, University of Melbourne, 207 Bouverie Street, Parkville, Victoria 3010, Australia
9Cancer Epidemiology Division, Cancer Council Victoria, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Pierre-Antoine Dugué
1Centre for Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, University of Melbourne, 207 Bouverie Street, Parkville, Victoria 3010, Australia
9Cancer Epidemiology Division, Cancer Council Victoria, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
10Precision Medicine, School of Clinical Sciences at Monash Health, Monash University, Clayton, Victoria, Australia
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
James G. Dowty
1Centre for Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, University of Melbourne, 207 Bouverie Street, Parkville, Victoria 3010, Australia
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Mark A. Jenkins
1Centre for Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, University of Melbourne, 207 Bouverie Street, Parkville, Victoria 3010, Australia
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Roger L. Milne
1Centre for Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, University of Melbourne, 207 Bouverie Street, Parkville, Victoria 3010, Australia
9Cancer Epidemiology Division, Cancer Council Victoria, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
10Precision Medicine, School of Clinical Sciences at Monash Health, Monash University, Clayton, Victoria, Australia
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Melissa C. Southey
9Cancer Epidemiology Division, Cancer Council Victoria, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
10Precision Medicine, School of Clinical Sciences at Monash Health, Monash University, Clayton, Victoria, Australia
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Graham G. Giles
1Centre for Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, University of Melbourne, 207 Bouverie Street, Parkville, Victoria 3010, Australia
9Cancer Epidemiology Division, Cancer Council Victoria, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
10Precision Medicine, School of Clinical Sciences at Monash Health, Monash University, Clayton, Victoria, Australia
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
John L. Hopper
1Centre for Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, University of Melbourne, 207 Bouverie Street, Parkville, Victoria 3010, Australia
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: j.hopper{at}unimelb.edu.au
  • Abstract
  • Full Text
  • Info/History
  • Metrics
  • Data/Code
  • Preview PDF
Loading

ABSTRACT

Background Mammograms contain information that predicts breast cancer risk. We recently discovered two novel mammogram-based breast cancer risk measures based on image brightness (Cirrocumulus) and texture (Cirrus). It is not known whether these measures improve risk prediction when fitted together, and with an established measure of mammographic density (Cumulus).

Methods We used three studies consisting of: 168 interval cases and 498 matched controls; 422 screen-detected cases and 1,197 matched controls; and 354 younger-diagnosis cases and 944 frequency-matched controls. We conducted conditional and unconditional logistic regression analyses of individually-and frequency-matched studies, respectively. We reported risk gradients as change in odds ratio per standard deviation of controls after adjusting for age and body mass index (OPERA). For models involving multiple measures, we calculated the OPERA equivalent to the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve.

Results For interval, screen-detected and younger-diagnosis cancer, the best fitting models (OPERAs [95% confidence intervals]) were: Cumulus (1.81 [1.41 to 2.31]) and Cirrus (1.7 [1.38 to 2.14]); Cirrus (1.49 [1.32 to 1.67]) and Cirrocumulus (1.16 [1.03 to 1.31]); and Cirrus (1.70 [1.48 to 1.94]) and Cirrocumulus (1.46 [1.27 to 1.68]), respectively. Their OPERA equivalents were: 2.35, 1.58, and 2.28, respectively.

Conclusions Our mammogram-based measures improved risk prediction beyond and, except for interval cancers, negated the influence of conventional mammographic density. Combined, these new mammogram-based risk measures are at least as accurate as the current polygenetic risk scores (OPERA ~ 1.6) in predicting, on a population basis, women who will be diagnosed with breast cancer.

Competing Interest Statement

GSD receives funding from Genetic Technologies Ltd for work unrelated to this study.

Funding Statement

This research was supported by the National Health and Medical Research Council (251533, 209057, and 504711), the Victorian Health Promotion Foundation, Cancer Council Victoria, Cancer Council NSW, Cancer Australia, and the National Breast Cancer Foundation. It has also been supported by the Breast Cancer Network Australia, the National Breast Cancer Foundation, Victoria Breast Cancer Research Consortium and was further supported by infrastructure provided by the Cancer Council Victoria and the University of Melbourne. We thank the Victorian Cancer Registry, BreastScreen Victoria, the Australian Mammographic Density Research Facility. TLN has been supported by Cure Cancer Australia Foundation through Cancer Australia Priority-Driven Collaborative Cancer Research Scheme (1159399). TLN and SL have been supported by Victorian Cancer Council Post-Doctoral Fellowships and grants from the Picchi Foundation, Victorian Comprehensive Cancer Centre. JLH is a NHMRC Senior Principal Research Fellow. MAJ and MCS are NHMRC Senior Research Fellows.

Author Declarations

I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.

Yes

The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:

This study was approved by the ethical committee of the University of Melbourne

All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.

Yes

I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).

Yes

I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.

Yes

Data Availability

For data accessment, please contact the corresponding author.

Copyright 
The copyright holder for this preprint is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. All rights reserved. No reuse allowed without permission.
Back to top
PreviousNext
Posted May 26, 2020.
Download PDF
Data/Code
Email

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word about medRxiv.

NOTE: Your email address is requested solely to identify you as the sender of this article.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Novel mammogram-based measures improve breast cancer risk prediction beyond an established measure of mammographic density
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from medRxiv
(Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from the medRxiv website.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Share
Novel mammogram-based measures improve breast cancer risk prediction beyond an established measure of mammographic density
Tuong L. Nguyen, Daniel F. Schmidt, Enes Makalic, Gertraud Maskarinec, Shuai Li, Gillian Dite, Ye K. Aung, Christopher F. Evans, Ho N. Trinh, Laura Baglietto, Jennifer Stone, Yun-Mi Song, Joohon Sung, Robert J. MacInnis, Pierre-Antoine Dugué, James G. Dowty, Mark A. Jenkins, Roger L. Milne, Melissa C. Southey, Graham G. Giles, John L. Hopper
medRxiv 2020.05.24.20111815; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.05.24.20111815
Twitter logo Facebook logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
Citation Tools
Novel mammogram-based measures improve breast cancer risk prediction beyond an established measure of mammographic density
Tuong L. Nguyen, Daniel F. Schmidt, Enes Makalic, Gertraud Maskarinec, Shuai Li, Gillian Dite, Ye K. Aung, Christopher F. Evans, Ho N. Trinh, Laura Baglietto, Jennifer Stone, Yun-Mi Song, Joohon Sung, Robert J. MacInnis, Pierre-Antoine Dugué, James G. Dowty, Mark A. Jenkins, Roger L. Milne, Melissa C. Southey, Graham G. Giles, John L. Hopper
medRxiv 2020.05.24.20111815; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.05.24.20111815

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Subject Area

  • Radiology and Imaging
Subject Areas
All Articles
  • Addiction Medicine (349)
  • Allergy and Immunology (668)
  • Allergy and Immunology (668)
  • Anesthesia (181)
  • Cardiovascular Medicine (2648)
  • Dentistry and Oral Medicine (316)
  • Dermatology (223)
  • Emergency Medicine (399)
  • Endocrinology (including Diabetes Mellitus and Metabolic Disease) (942)
  • Epidemiology (12228)
  • Forensic Medicine (10)
  • Gastroenterology (759)
  • Genetic and Genomic Medicine (4103)
  • Geriatric Medicine (387)
  • Health Economics (680)
  • Health Informatics (2657)
  • Health Policy (1005)
  • Health Systems and Quality Improvement (985)
  • Hematology (363)
  • HIV/AIDS (851)
  • Infectious Diseases (except HIV/AIDS) (13695)
  • Intensive Care and Critical Care Medicine (797)
  • Medical Education (399)
  • Medical Ethics (109)
  • Nephrology (436)
  • Neurology (3882)
  • Nursing (209)
  • Nutrition (577)
  • Obstetrics and Gynecology (739)
  • Occupational and Environmental Health (695)
  • Oncology (2030)
  • Ophthalmology (585)
  • Orthopedics (240)
  • Otolaryngology (306)
  • Pain Medicine (250)
  • Palliative Medicine (75)
  • Pathology (473)
  • Pediatrics (1115)
  • Pharmacology and Therapeutics (466)
  • Primary Care Research (452)
  • Psychiatry and Clinical Psychology (3432)
  • Public and Global Health (6527)
  • Radiology and Imaging (1403)
  • Rehabilitation Medicine and Physical Therapy (814)
  • Respiratory Medicine (871)
  • Rheumatology (409)
  • Sexual and Reproductive Health (410)
  • Sports Medicine (342)
  • Surgery (448)
  • Toxicology (53)
  • Transplantation (185)
  • Urology (165)