Skip to main content
medRxiv
  • Home
  • About
  • Submit
  • ALERTS / RSS
Advanced Search

Body mass index multiple regression formula testable by eight Bradford Hill causality criteria: Worldwide ecological cohort data analysis to inform dietary guidance

View ORCID ProfileDavid K Cundiff, View ORCID ProfileChunyi Wu
doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.07.27.20162487
David K Cundiff
1Long Beach, California, USA
3Volunteer collaborators with the Institute of Health Metrics and Evaluation, Seattle, Washington, USA
Roles: independent researcher
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for David K Cundiff
  • For correspondence: davidkcundiff{at}gmail.com
Chunyi Wu
2Area Specialist Lead in Epidemiology and Statistics, Michigan Medicine, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA
3Volunteer collaborators with the Institute of Health Metrics and Evaluation, Seattle, Washington, USA
Roles: Research Epidemiologist/Statistician
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Chunyi Wu
  • Abstract
  • Full Text
  • Info/History
  • Metrics
  • Data/Code
  • Preview PDF
Loading

Abstract

Objectives (1) Derive a worldwide body mass index (BMI) multiple regression formula (BMI formula), (2) Quantify the percent weights attributable to dietary and other risk factors from this BMI formula, and (3) Test relevant dietary guidelines and diets using the BMI formula generated BMI estimates

Design BMI and risk factor cohort data from 1990-2017 from the Institute of Health Metrics and Evaluation (IHME) were formatted and population-weighted. We empirically explored the univariate and multiple regression correlations of risk factors with BMI to maximize BMI formula functionality.

Setting Worldwide

Ecological cohort data Over 12,000 Global Burden of Disease (GBD) risk factor surveys of people 15-69 years old from 195 countries analysed and synthesised into representative cohort risk factor values by staff and volunteer collaborators with the IHME

Main outcome measures Performance of a worldwide BMI formula when tested with eight Bradford Hill causality criteria, each scored with 0-5 scale: 0=negative to 5=very strong support (40 possible score)

Results In the BMI formula derived, all foods were expressed in kilocalories/day (kcal/day), and all risk factor coefficients were adjusted to equate with their percent weight impacts on BMI. BMI formula =0.29*processed meat +11.87*red meat +0.02*fish +3.74*milk +11.09*poultry +5.46*eggs +1.95*alcohol +6.29*sugary beverages +0.29*corn +3.53*potatoes +2.71 * saturated fatty acids+ 0.64*polyunsaturated fatty acids+0.06*trans fatty acids-0.37*fruit - 0.52*vegetables -0.03*nuts and seeds -0.12 *whole grains -0.47*legumes-8.26*rice -18*sweet potatoes -9.93*physical activity (METs/week) +5.78*total kcals/day available-4.13*child underweight+0.92*discontinued breast feeding. BMI increasing foods have + signs in the BMI formula and BMI decreasing foods have - signs. Bradford Hill causality criteria test scores (0-5): strength=5, (2) consistency=5, (3) dose-response=5, (4) temporality=5, (5) analogy=4, (6) plausibility=5, (7) experimentation=5 and (8) coherence=5. Total=39/40. Based on the USA BMI trend data, the mean adult BMI in 1990 was 25.45, is projected to be 28.13 in 2020, and 31.81 in 2050. BMI formula based mean BMI estimates included the following: Dietary Guidelines for Americans=26.34, USA with 50% reduction of BMI increasing food intake =23.34, USA with 25% reduction of BMI increasing food intake and increasing physical activity by running at 6 mph for 1 hour/day on average=23.67, vegetarian diet=22.54, low carbohydrate, high fat diet=31.76.

Conclusions Eight relevant Bradford Hill causality criteria strongly supported that the BMI formula derived was causally related to mean BMIs of worldwide cohorts, subgroups, and individual risk factor patterns. The statistical analysis methodology introduced could inform individual, clinical, and public health strategies regarding overweight/obesity prevention/treatment and other health outcomes.

Competing Interest Statement

The authors have declared no competing interest.

Clinical Trial

The data came from the Institute of Health Metrics and Evaluation from > 12,000 surveys.

Funding Statement

This research received no grant from any funding agency in the public, commercial or not-for-profit sectors. The Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation funded the acquisition of the data for this analysis by the IHME. The data were provided to the authors as volunteer collaborators with IHME.

Author Declarations

I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.

Yes

The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:

Ethics committee and IRB approval: NA. This study is based solely on data from IHME GBD database, which we have IHME permission to use.

All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.

Yes

I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).

Yes

I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.

Yes

Data Availability

The raw, unformatted data used in this analysis 2017 Global Burden of Disease data) are now out of date. The 2019 GBD data on all the variables in this analysis may be obtained from the IHME by volunteer collaborating researchers. Our data formatting software code in R and SAS and our formatted database are available on request to researchers who are collaborators with IHME.

Copyright 
The copyright holder for this preprint is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under a CC-BY-NC 4.0 International license.
Back to top
PreviousNext
Posted July 29, 2020.
Download PDF
Data/Code
Email

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word about medRxiv.

NOTE: Your email address is requested solely to identify you as the sender of this article.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Body mass index multiple regression formula testable by eight Bradford Hill causality criteria: Worldwide ecological cohort data analysis to inform dietary guidance
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from medRxiv
(Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from the medRxiv website.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Share
Body mass index multiple regression formula testable by eight Bradford Hill causality criteria: Worldwide ecological cohort data analysis to inform dietary guidance
David K Cundiff, Chunyi Wu
medRxiv 2020.07.27.20162487; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.07.27.20162487
Twitter logo Facebook logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
Citation Tools
Body mass index multiple regression formula testable by eight Bradford Hill causality criteria: Worldwide ecological cohort data analysis to inform dietary guidance
David K Cundiff, Chunyi Wu
medRxiv 2020.07.27.20162487; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.07.27.20162487

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Subject Area

  • Public and Global Health
Subject Areas
All Articles
  • Addiction Medicine (349)
  • Allergy and Immunology (668)
  • Allergy and Immunology (668)
  • Anesthesia (181)
  • Cardiovascular Medicine (2648)
  • Dentistry and Oral Medicine (316)
  • Dermatology (223)
  • Emergency Medicine (399)
  • Endocrinology (including Diabetes Mellitus and Metabolic Disease) (942)
  • Epidemiology (12228)
  • Forensic Medicine (10)
  • Gastroenterology (759)
  • Genetic and Genomic Medicine (4103)
  • Geriatric Medicine (387)
  • Health Economics (680)
  • Health Informatics (2657)
  • Health Policy (1005)
  • Health Systems and Quality Improvement (985)
  • Hematology (363)
  • HIV/AIDS (851)
  • Infectious Diseases (except HIV/AIDS) (13695)
  • Intensive Care and Critical Care Medicine (797)
  • Medical Education (399)
  • Medical Ethics (109)
  • Nephrology (436)
  • Neurology (3882)
  • Nursing (209)
  • Nutrition (577)
  • Obstetrics and Gynecology (739)
  • Occupational and Environmental Health (695)
  • Oncology (2030)
  • Ophthalmology (585)
  • Orthopedics (240)
  • Otolaryngology (306)
  • Pain Medicine (250)
  • Palliative Medicine (75)
  • Pathology (473)
  • Pediatrics (1115)
  • Pharmacology and Therapeutics (466)
  • Primary Care Research (452)
  • Psychiatry and Clinical Psychology (3432)
  • Public and Global Health (6527)
  • Radiology and Imaging (1403)
  • Rehabilitation Medicine and Physical Therapy (814)
  • Respiratory Medicine (871)
  • Rheumatology (409)
  • Sexual and Reproductive Health (410)
  • Sports Medicine (342)
  • Surgery (448)
  • Toxicology (53)
  • Transplantation (185)
  • Urology (165)