Abstract
Importance Artificial intelligence analytics may be applied to global burden of disease (GBD) data on body mass index (BMI) and associated risk factors.
Objective Rigorously quantify the interactions of dietary and other risk factors that result in adult BMI
Design We formatted global burden of disease data relevant to body mass index and associated risk factors. We empirically explored the univariate and multiple regression correlations of BMI risk factors with worldwide BMI to derive a BMI multiple regression formula (BMI formula).
Setting Worldwide
Participants Institute of Health Metrics and Evaluation staff and volunteer collaborators analyzed over 12,000 GBD risk factor surveys of people from 195 countries and synthesized the data into representative cohort BMI and risk factor values.
Main outcome measures the performances of the BMI formula when tested with all nine Bradford Hill causality criteria each scored on a 0-5 scale: 0=negative to 5=very strong support
Results In the BMI formula derived, all foods were expressed in kilocalories/day (kcal/day). We adjusted BMI formula risk factor coefficients to equate with their population attributable fractions (PAFs in percent’s) relating to worldwide mean BMI. BMI increasing foods had “+” signs and BMI decreasing foods had “-“ signs. Total PAF of BMI formula=80.96%. BMI formula=(0.37%*processed meat + 4.23%*red meat + 0.02%*fish + 2.24%*milk + 5.67%*poultry + 1.77%*eggs + 0.34%*alcohol + 0.99%*sugary beverages + 0.04%*corn + 0.72%*potatoes + 8.48%*saturated fatty acids + 3.89%*polyunsaturated fatty acids + 0.27%*trans fatty acids - 2.99%*fruit - 4.07%*vegetables - 0.37%*nuts and seeds - 0.45%*whole grains - 1.49%*legumes - 8.62%*rice - 0.10%*sweet potatoes - 7.45% physical activity (METs/week) - 20.38%*child underweight + 6.02%*sex (male=1, female=2))*0.05012 + 21.77. (BMI formula versus BMI: r=0.907 (95% CI: 0.903 to 0.911) p<0.0001, Bradford Hill causality criteria test scores (0-5): (1) strength=5, (2) experimentation=5, (3) consistency=5, (4) dose-response=5, (5) temporality=5, (6) analogy=4, (7), plausibility=5, (8) specificity=5, and (9) coherence=5. Total score=44/45.
Conclusions and relevance Nine Bradford Hill causality criteria strongly supported a causal relationship between the BMI formula derived and mean BMIs of worldwide cohorts. The artificial intelligence methodology introduced could inform individual, clinical, and public health strategies regarding overweight/obesity prevention/treatment and other health outcomes.
Question Can worldwide global burden of disease (GBD) data analysis derive a body mass index (BMI) multiple regression formula testable by Bradford Hill causality criteria?
Findings A multiple regression derived formula including population attributable fractions (PAFs) of 20 dietary risk factors, physical activity, childhood severe underweight, and sex satisfied all nine Bradford Hill causality criteria. The BMI formula also plausibly predicted the long-term BMI outcomes related to various dietary and physical activity scenarios.
Meaning GBD data analysis of BMI and associated risk factors may infer causality with overweight/obesity and possibly for health outcomes in nutritional epidemiology generally.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Clinical Trial
The data came from the Institute of Health Metrics and Evaluation from > 12,000 surveys.
Funding Statement
This research received no grant from any funding agency in the public, commercial or not-for-profit sectors. The Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation funded the acquisition of the data for this analysis by the IHME. The data were provided to the authors as volunteer collaborators with IHME.
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
Ethics committee and IRB approval: NA. This study is based solely on data from IHME GBD database, which we have IHME permission to use.
All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.
Yes
Footnotes
Manuscript completely revised along with the tables. Two appendices added.
Data Availability
The raw, unformatted data used in this analysis is now out of date. The 2019 GBD data on all the variables in this analysis may be obtained from the IHME by volunteer collaborating researchers. The formatted database, SAS codes and Excel spreadsheets on which this analysis is based are posted on the Mendeley data repository.
https://data.mendeley.com/v1/datasets/publish-confirmation/g6b39zxck4/6
