ABSTRACT
Background Correct clinical diagnosis at the first episode of psychosis may be difficult due to many non-specific symptoms. We aimed to determine the factors associated with a correct diagnosis among patients with a first episode of psychosis in Uganda.
Methods A cross sectional study design was performed at the Butabika National Referral Mental Hospital in Uganda. We included treatment naïve participants aged 18 to 60 years with a diagnosis of a psychotic disorder. Patients with organic disorders like HIV/AIDS, syphilis and substance use disorders were excluded. The MINI international neuropsychiatric inventory was administered to confirm the clinical diagnosis. Concordance was based on the percentage agreement and kappa statistic between the admission chart diagnosis and the MINI diagnosis.
Results 178 participants with a first episode of psychosis were included into the final analysis. The agreement between the MINI diagnosis and clinician diagnosis was 0.385, (P < 0.001) with a concordance of 49.5%. After controlling for nationality and the household’s source of income, duration of untreated psychosis, [p-value 0.028(95%CI: 0.07-0.89)], living with a primary family member, [p-value 0.038(95%CI:0.95-2.86)] and cadre of the clinician who made the initial diagnosis[Medical officer, [p-value 0.011(95%CI: 0.18-0.80)] were associated with a correct diagnosis.
Conclusion We found low agreement between clinician diagnoses and MINI diagnoses at the first episode of psychosis. Improved training of staff while considering the duration of untreated psychosis and the living arrangements of the patient are required to improve diagnostic accuracy in this population.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
The funding for this study was provided by the Neuropsychiatric Genetics in African Populations (NeuroGAP) Psychosis project (Anne Stevenson et al., 2019). The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the project.
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
Ethical approval was sought from the Uganda National Council for Science and Technology (UNCST), the School of Medicine Research and Ethics Committee (SOMREC), Makerere University and institutional approval from Butabika hospital.
All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.
Yes
Data Availability
The fully anonymized data set is available on request from the corresponding author.
