Background
Humanitarian response actors evaluate crisis severity with the INFORM Severity Index, a publicly available metric. This index, however, has not undergone critical statistical review. If imprecise or incorrect, humanitarian response may be negatively impacted.
Methods The INFROM Severity Index is calculated from 35 publicly available indicators, which conceptually reflect the severity of each crisis We used 172 unique global crises from the INFORM SEVERITY Index database that occurred January 1 to November 30, 2019, or were ongoing by this date. We applied exploratory factor analysis (EFA) to determine common factors within the dataset. We then applied a second-order confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) to predict crisis severity as a latent construct. Model fit was assessed via chi-square goodness-of-fit statistic, Comparative Fit Index (CFI), Tucker-Lewis Index (TLI), and Root Mean Square Error of Approximation (RMSEA).
Results The EFA models suggested a 3- or 4-factor solution, with 46% and 53% variance explained in each model, respectively. The final CFA was parsimonious, containing three factors comprised of 11 indicators, with reasonable model fit (Chi-squared=107, with 40 degrees of freedom, CFI=0.94, TLI=0.92, RMSEA=0.10). In the second-order CFA, the magnitude of standardized factor-loading on the ‘societal governance’ latent construct had the strongest association with the latent construct of ‘crisis severity’ (0.73), followed by the ‘humanitarian access/safety’ construct (0.56). Conclusions: A metric of crisis-severity is a critical step towards improving humanitarian response, but only when it reflects real life conditions. Our work is a first step in refining an existing framework to quantify crisis severity.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
No external funding was received for this analysis.
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
The Human Research Protection Office within the Center for Global Health at the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention reviewed the study and determined it to be non-research.
All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.
Yes
Data Availability
Data are publicly available.
https://data.humdata.org/dataset/inform-global-crisis-severity-index
