The Relationship between Chronological Age, Dental Age, and Salivary Alkaline Phosphatase in Indonesian Children Aged 8-14 Years: A Cross-Sectional Study

Sindy Cornelia Nelwan, Soegeng Wahluyo, Firli Cahaya Khairani, Ricardo Adrian Nugraha, Haryono Utomo, Udijanto Tedjosasongko
doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.01.14.21249792

Abstract

Background Inability to predict dental age accurately has long been the Achilles heel of pediatric dentistry. Whilst dental age has an important aspect in clinical practice, saliva can be one of the most practically important diagnostic tools to estimate biological age.

Aims This study was aimed to analyze a correlation between chronological age, dental age, and salivary alkaline phosphatase in Indonesian children aged 8-14 years.

Methods This study was an observational study with cross-sectional design. Twenty healthy children (10 boys; age 10.504 ± 1.895 years) were selected by a consecutive sampling. Chronological age was assessed by recording date of birth. Dental age was assessed by orthopantamogram following Demirjian’s method. Salivary samples were collected by passive drool method and estimation of alkaline phosphatase was done by autoanalyzer.

Results Normality test was assessed using Kolmogorov-Smirnov and Shapiro-Wilk test. Statistical analyses were assessed using Spearman’s rank-order correlation coefficients. Results are presented as mean ± standard deviation (SD). Mean chronological age was10.504 ± 1.895 years, mean Demirjian’s score was 91.74 ± 5.972, and mean salivary alkaline phosphatase was 291.563 ± 115.135 pg/ml. There is a very strong positive correlation between chronological age and dental age (r=+0.804; p<0.001). On the contrary, levels of salivary alkaline phosphatase was negatively correlated to dental age (r=-0.780; p<0.001) and chronological age (r=-0.508; p=0.022).

Conclusions This study showed a strong correlation between dental age, chronological age, and salivary alkaline phosphatase; hence, estimation of dental age and salivary alkaline phosphatase in Indonesian children during early and late childhood has significant meaning to chronological age.

INTRODUCTION

Age estimation has gained increasing importance in many practical decisions, such as legal medicine, forensic science, anthropology and clinical practice1. In legal medicine, age estimation may help judges, courts and government to determine the exact age of persons whose actual age is unknown, in accordance with the rule of ethical, legal, and criminal perspectives2. In forensic science, age estimation can guide investigators to the correct identity of unknown bodies among a large number of possible matches and in the identification, work associated with mass disasters3. In anthropology, predicting an age could be a way to establish the identity of human remains4-5. In clinical practice, clinician shouldn’t only rely on chronological age for objective health indicators, subjective health perceptions, and psychological well-being indicators, because there are some conditions or development variations making chronological age and biological age might not be the same6-7.

In instances where chronological age is unknown, unclear, undocumented or missing, there are several ways to predict biological age as accurate as chronological age8. At present, biological age can be measured by bone age and dental age9. Bone age and dental age have been assessed to determine to what extent they are correlated for diagnostic purposes9. Measurement of bone age is based on skeletal indicators such as hand-wrist bone ossification, changes in pubic symphysis, and fusion of cranial sutures which are utilized for to indicate level of biological and structural maturity better than the chronological age10. Measurement of dental age is based on morphologic methods, biochemistry methods, and radiographic methods which show dental maturation11. Considering that states of dental mineralization are much less affected by nutritional12 and hormonal13 variations than states of bone mineralization, dental age provides more reliable estimation of biological age than bone age14.

Long time ago, researchers and clinicians have discovered tooth development that takes place from early fetal life to approximately 20 years of age15. As long as dental age estimation is concerned, several methods have been proposed for assessing dental development, which is generally referred to as dental age16. Morphologic and radiographic methods (Cameriere’s, Schour-Massler’s, Demirjian’s, and Kvaal’s method) are useful in living humans17, whereas biochemistry methods (Gustafson’s and Johanson’s method, Bang and Ramm method, aspartic acid racemization and cemental annulation technique) are useful in dead victims18.

Demirjian’s method has been the most widely used method and considered as the gold standard for dental age estimation19. Several literatures supports Demirjian’s method for dental age estimation in Northeastern Turkish children20, Malay population21, Western Chinese children22, Malaysian children23, Belgaum population24, Lucknow children25, Indian children19, and Indonesian children26-28.

Some alternative strategies such as biochemistry parameters will increase the precision and reliability of dental age estimation. In this decade, interest in saliva as a diagnostic medium to estimate children’s dental age has increased exponentially. Salivary components such as enzymes, immunoglobulins, inorganic materials and ions have different concentration in the different age29. From some salivary components, there are few components that sounds interesting to be observed in accordance to dental aging and maturation. One of them is alkaline phosphatase, in which the application for bone growth isn’t no longer debatable30.

Alkaline phosphatase (ALP) itself is a hydrolase intracellular enzyme participating in the remineralization processes of enamel31. ALP is a membrane-bound glycoprotein found on growing cells and most cell membranes in the body and physiologically occurs during bone formation in developmental stages32. ALP is synthesized by the osteoblasts and is presumed to be involved in the calcification of bone matrix and bone mineralization, varying from 77% to 89% in children and from 58% to 67% in adults33. Since serum ALP concentrations have limitations in their great discrepancies within age and sex34, we try to estimate salivary ALP concentrations which tend to be more stable and could represent true age with good approximation.

AIMS OR OBJECTIVES

This study aimed to analyze a correlation between chronological age, dental age, and salivary alkaline phosphatase in children aged 8-14 years. The authors proposed the following specific objectives: 1) to analyze the predictive capacities of Demirjian method for age estimation in an Indonesian children population; 2) to detect ALP levels in saliva and to correlate it with the dental age and to project it as a noninvasive tool for assessment of chronological age; 3) to compare and correlate the magnitude of agreement of the dental age and salivary ALP to construct a global model with a predictive value of chronological age; 4) to carry out empirical testing of the model’s adjustment, comparing real values with predicted values.

METHODS

Study design and study setting

An analytic observational study with cross-sectional study design was done in this study. This cross-sectional study involved analysis of confounding variables. Chronological age, dental age and salivary ALP concentration were included as the major variables and sex as the confounding variables. This study was conducted in the Department of Pediatric Dentistry, Faculty of Dental Medicine, Universitas Airlangga, during 1-31 January 2018. Dental examination and radiographs were taken at Universitas Airlangga Oral and Dental Hospital. Samples of saliva were brought and analyzed at Institute of Tropical Diseases - Universitas Airlangga. We observed and analyzed data from subjects with inclusion and exclusion criteria as follow. The findings of the three variables were compared between the study participants.

Subject population

Indonesian healthy children of Javanese ethnicity who were treated at the Universitas Airlangga Oral and Dental Hospital, Surabaya during 1-31 January 2018, included girls and boys at the same proportion. A consecutive sampling was done in this study to achieve 24 subjects to participate with the following inclusion and exclusion criteria.

Inclusion criteria

  • Healthy children aged 8-14 years recruited from the community

  • Understand and able to cooperate to the research protocol

  • Subjects’ parents or legal representatives have signed the written consent in accordance with our institutional policies

Exclusion criteria

  • History of musculoskeletal conditions such as rickets or recent fractures

  • History of maxillofacial trauma with significant numbers of missing teeth

  • History of childhood obesity, cancer, and type I diabetes mellitus

  • History of liver or bile ducts diseases, anemia, or hyperparathyroidism

  • History of gingivitis, dental caries, severe bacterial infection within 12 months

  • History of maternal alcohol use during pregnancy and/or breast-feeding

  • Orthopantomogram distortion due to incomplete exposure, subject movement during exposure, or improper positioning of subject

  • Subjects who are unable to perform the test or uncooperate

Method to calculate chronological age

Subjects’ birth dates were noted after analyzing their specific identity proofs. Consistent with recent age form consensus definitions from Merriam-Webster, chronological age or calendar age was measured of an individual’s age based on the calendar date on which he or she was born35.

Method to estimate dental age

Subjects’ dental age were analyzed with Orthopantomograph OP200 D Dental Digital Panoramic X-ray Unitat 71-73 V and 10 mA. Exposure time was 13-14 seconds with 4096 bits grey scale level. Subjects’ radiographs selection criteria were as follows:

  • Only high-quality panoramic radiographs, with respect to angulations, contrast and correct positioning, were included in this study.

  • Radiographs should be free from any artifacts.

  • Radiographs should not show any developmental anomalies of teeth related to size, shape and structure of teeth.

Estimation of dental age was done using Demirjian′s method considering 7 permanent left mandibular teeth from central incisor to II molar36. Determination of dental age was based upon the rate of development and calcification of tooth buds. The developmental stage of each tooth was assessed and then each tooth was given a score according to its stage of development using the score table. Adding 7 individual scores from permanent central incisor to 2nd permanent molar gives a maturity score, maturity score will be converted into dental age using conversion chart37.

Demirjian’s tooth mineralization stages are as follows:

Stage A: Beginning mineralization of separate cusps.

Stage B: Fusion of cusps.

Stage C: Beginning of dentinal deposits is seen.

Stage D: Crown formation completed down to the cemento-enamel junction.

Stage E: The root length is less than the crown height.

Stage F: The root length is equal to or greater than crown height.

Stage G: The walls of the root canal are parallel and its apical end is still partially open.

Stage H: The apical foramen is completed. [36]

In order to assess the reproducibility of our analysis, a subset of 24 orthopantomogram radiographs included in this study were randomly and blindly chosen to be reviewed by 4 independent observers within a period of 2 weeks. Independent observers compared the radiographic and actual tooth eruptions. Results were calculated from the average of each independent observers’ score.

Method to estimate salivary alkaline phosphatase concentration

A volume of 1.5 ml of unstimulated saliva samples were collected in sample container from 20 subjects. Subjects were instructed not to take food for 2 hours prior to saliva collection. All subjects were asked to collect saliva into a sample container. Samples of saliva was brought and analyzed at Institute of Tropical Diseases, Universitas Airlangga. Sample was collected and centrifuged at 3000 rpm for 15 minutes. The reagents used in this analysis were p-Nitrophenylphospate, and 2-amino-2-methyl-1-propanol. Using Bio-Rad iMark Microplate Absorbance Reader, ALP was estimated and the value of ALP was expressed in pg/ml. The readings obtained on the screen of analyzer were noted.

Statistical analysis

All the data was recorded, tabulated and statistically analyzed using the Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS, version 13.0; SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL) software. Statistical presentation and analysis of the present study was conducted using mean ± standard derivative (SD). The normality criterion was evaluated using Kolmogorov-Smirnov and Saphiro–Wilk test. The quantitative variables were compared using the Spearman correlation test. The statistical differences were significant if p-values < 0.05.

RESULT

A total 24 subjects were selected who matched inclusion and exclusion criteria in the study, of which 20 subjects were included in the study. From 24 subjects selected to participate in this study, 4 subjects were excluded as follows: 1 had fear of dental x-ray for panoramic scanning, 2 failed to collect saliva samples, and 1 parent rejected to participate after information to consent had been given due to lack of time.

Table 1 presents mean and median of chorological age, dental age and ALP concentration between all subjects. Twenty subjects were included and 50% of them were boys. The median chronological age of all the subjects was 9.75 years (8.08-13.42 years). The median Demirjian’s score for dental age was 92.45 (77.2 – 98.9). The median ALP concentration was 267.45 pg/mL (95.26 – 458.9 pg/mL).

View this table:
Table 1. Mean and median of chorological age, dental age and ALP concentration between 20 subjects

Out of 20 subjects, data were analyzed separately for girls, boys, and for both sex together. The mean biological age was 10.127 years for girls, 10.943 years for boys, and 10.504 years for the whole study group. Table 2 showed mean of dental age and ALP concentrations according to sex and chronological age. Chronological age are divided by median value (11 years), in which 13 subjects belong to group 1 (<11 years old) and 7 subjects belong to group 2 (≥11 years). Sex proportion did not show significant correlation with neither dental age nor ALP concentration.

View this table:
Table 2. Mean of dental age and ALP concentrations according to sex and chronological age

We estimated each variable’snormality distributional assumptions using Kolmogorov-Smirnov and Shapiro-Wilk test. Normality test for the main variables can be seen in Table 3. Statistical analysis with Kolmogorov-Smirnov and Shapiro-Wilk revealed that dental age and ALP concentrations are normally distributed, whereas chronological age isn’t normally distributed.

View this table:
Table 3. Kolmogorov-Smirnov and Shapiro-Wilk normality tests for main variables

Relationship between dental age and ALP concentration

The results of the correlational analysis between dental age (Demirjian’s score) and ALP concentration are summarized in Table 4. Among general characteristics, ALP concentration showed a significantly negative correlation with dental age (r=−0.780; p<0.001).

View this table:
Table 4. Correlation between dental age and ALP concentration

Relationship between dental age and chronological age

The results of the correlational analysis between dental age (Demirjian’s score) and chronological age are summarized in Table 5. Among general characteristics, chronological age showed a very strong positive correlation with dental age (r=+0.804; p<0.001).

View this table:
Table 5. Correlation between dental age and chronological age

Relationship between chronological age and ALP concentration

The results of the correlational analysis between chronological age and ALP concentration are summarized in Table 6. Among general characteristics, ALP concentration showed a moderate negative correlation with dental age (r=−0.508; p=0.022).

View this table:
Table 6. Correlation between chronological age and ALP concentration

DISCUSSION

Various methods of dental age estimation are proposed by Demirjian, Nolla, Willems and Haavikko for growing individuals. All methods to estimate dental age are based on the following characteristics: eruption of the permanent tooth, level of root resorption of the primary tooth, and state of development of the root of the permanent teeth. Knowledge of deciduous crown formation times is useful in forensic anthropology and when aging juvenile remains from an archaeological context38. The findings of the present study showed that the Demirjian method had great accuracy for determining dental age in Indonesian healthy children in both sex. From the findings of the presented studies, a lack of precision and reliability between values of the dental age and salivary ALP to chronological age occurs in older age, because complete mineralization of the tooth root were increased, due to great variations of food intake and development in the difference socio-economic status39-40.

The results obtained in this cross-sectional study also demonstrated that the salivary ALP values were significantly correlated to biological age (Demirjian’s score) and chronological age. The values obtained in the study showed a high range of standard deviation which could have been because of great individual variation with regard to food intake and recent development. Salivary ALP has a vital role that may account for qualitative and quantitative dental maturation and remineralization. In contrast to serum bone ALP concentrations, salivary ALP concentrations are rarely used in routine biochemical tests41. Although salivary ALP concentrations can be performed in almost all laboratories, most pediatric dentists and forensic odontologists are doubted that its value can be altered by pathological conditions in dental tissue. Rise in salivary ALP levels can reflect activity of osteoblasts in spite of inflammation and destruction of healthy tissues such as dental caries or bone fracture42. Keeping in mind it was hypothesized that both physiologic and pathologic conditions have been associated with rise in serum ALP levels, possibly like bone growth, bone pathologies, hepatobiliary diseases and diabetes mellitus might have been associated with rise in salivary ALP levels too43.

Strength and limitation

In the current study, we explored the relationship between chronological age and various indexes indicating dental maturation. One of the most significant findings to emerge from this study is that dental age (Demirjian’s score) and ALP concentration had a very strong correlation with chronological age and didn’t affect by sex bias. However, as noted before, discrepancies between chronological and biological ages are greater with increasing chronological age, despite the fact that advanced ages are associated with increased physical health problems such as dental caries, gingivitis and chronic periodontitis. With increasing age, the number of valid and meaningful dental characteristics diminishes, and therefore the accuracy of dental age assessment decreases44. In forensic dentistry, an accepted range of error values between the estimated dental age and chronological age for children is between 0.5-1.0 year45. According to the findings of the present study, Demirjian’s method and salivary ALP met these criteria to estimate biological age in the majority of Indonesian children. Another limitation of our study is the lack number of subjects, which can produce false-positive results, difficult statistical analysis or over-estimate the magnitude of an association between chronological age, dental age and salivary ALP.

CONCLUSION

On the basis of the results of this study, it can be concluded that there is a strong correlation between dental age, chronological age, and salivary alkaline phosphatase among Indonesian children. We emphasize that dental age and salivary alkaline phosphatase have been developed to estimate the same, but accuracy of these methods are defined by their ability to arrive at an age as close to the chronological age, within acceptable error limits. The most important things are to combine several methods to improve the accuracy, reproducibility, precision and to reduce the discrepancy of actual age. Each technique should be feasible, simple and has a convenient approach for subjects.

Data Availability

The datasets generated during and/or analyzed during the current study are not publicly available due to protecting participant confidentiality but are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

http://repository.unair.ac.id/82247/

AVAILABILITY OF DATA AND MATERIAL

The datasets generated during and/or analyzed during the current study are not publicly available due to protecting participant confidentiality but are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

FINANCIAL SUPPORT AND SPONSORSHIP

Nil.

CONFLICT OF INTEREST

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

APPENDICES

REFERENCES

  1. 1.↵
    Tomás LF, Mónico LSM, Tomás I, Varela-Patiño P, Martin-Biedma B. The accuracy of estimating chronological age from Demirjian and Nolla methods in a Portuguese and Spanish sample. BMC Oral Health. 2014;14:160.
    OpenUrl
  2. 2.↵
    Schmeling A, Dettmeyer R, Rudolf E, Vieth V, Geserick G. Forensic Age Estimation. Dtsch Arztebl Int. 2016 Jan; 113(4): 44–50.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  3. 3.↵
    Alkass K, Buchholz BA, Ohtani S, Yamamoto T, Druid H, Spalding KL. Age Estimation in Forensic Sciences. Mol Cell Proteomics. 2010;9(5):1022–30.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  4. 4.↵
    Albert AM, Wright CL. DNA Prediction in Forensic Anthropology and the Identity Sciences. Global JAnthropol Res. 2015;2:1–6
    OpenUrl
  5. 5.↵
    Karaarslan B, Karaarslan ES, Ozsevik AS, Ertas E. Age Estimation for Dental Patients Using Orthopantomographs. Eur J Dent. 2010;4(4):389–394.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  6. 6.↵
    Cugati N, Kumaresan R, Srinivasan B, Karthikeyan P. Dental age estimation of growing children by measurement of open apices: A Malaysian formula. J Forensic Dent Sci 2015;7:227–31.
    OpenUrl
  7. 7.↵
    Choi NG, DiNitto DM, Kim J. Discrepancy between Chronological Age and Felt Age: Age Group Difference in Objective and Subjective Health as Correlates. J Aging Health. 2014;26(3):458–473.a
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  8. 8.↵
    Franklin D, Flavel A, Noble J, Swift L, Karkhanis S. Forensic age estimation in living individuals: methodological considerations in the context of medico-legal practice. Res Rep Forensic Med Sci. 2015;5:53–66.
    OpenUrl
  9. 9.↵
    Couoh LR. Differences between biological and chronological age-at-death in human skeletal remains: A change of perspective. Am J Phys Anthropol. 2017 Aug;163(4):671–695.
    OpenUrl
  10. 10.↵
    Mughal AM, Hassan N, Ahmed A. Bone Age Assessment Methods: A Critical Review. Pak J Med Sci. 2014 Jan-Feb; 30(1): 211–215.
    OpenUrl
  11. 11.↵
    Limdiwala PG, Shah JS. Age estimation by using dental radiographs. J Forensic Dent Sci. 2013;5(2):118–22.
    OpenUrl
  12. 12.↵
    Jayaraman J, Roberts GJ, King NM, Wong HM. Dental age assessment of southern Chinese using the United Kingdom Caucasian reference dataset. Forensic Sci Int. 2012 Mar 10; 216(1-3):68–72.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  13. 13.↵
    Bagherpour A, Imanimoghaddam M, Bagherpour MR, Einolghozati M. Dental age assessment among Iranian children aged 6-13 years using the Demirjian method. Forensic Sci Int. 2010;197(1-3):121.e1-4.
    OpenUrl
  14. 14.↵
    Sarkar S, Kailasam S, Mahesh Kumar P. Accuracy of estimation of dental age in comparison with chronological age in Indian population--a comparative analysis of two formulas. J Forensic Leg Med. 2013;20(4):230–3.
    OpenUrl
  15. 15.↵
    Cavrić J, Vodanović M, Marušić A, Galić I. Time of mineralization of permanent teeth in children and adolescents in Gaborone, Botswana. Ann Anat. 2016;203:24–32.
    OpenUrl
  16. 16.↵
    Piyush G. Limdiwala and J. S. Shah. Age estimation by using dental radiographs. J Forensic Dent Sci. 2013;5(2):118–22.
    OpenUrl
  17. 17.↵
    Gazge NM. Pachipulusu B, Chandra P, Govindraju P, Vasan V. Comparative analysis of kvaal’s and cameriere’s methods for dental age estimation: A panoramic radiographic study. Int J Forensic Odontol. 2018;3(1):30–5.
    OpenUrl
  18. 18.↵
    Arany S, Ohtani S. Age estimation by racemization method in teeth: application of aspartic acid, glutamate, and alanine. J Forensic Sci. 2010 May;55(3):701–5.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  19. 19.↵
    Jain V, Kapoor P, Miglani R. Demirjian approach of dental age estimation: Abridged for operator ease. J Forensic Dent Sci. 2016 Sep-Dec; 8(3): 177.
    OpenUrl
  20. 20.↵
    Nur B, Kusgoz A, Bayram M, Celikoglu M, Nur M, Kayipmaz S, et al. Validity of Demirjian and Nolla methods for dental age estimation for Northeastern Turkish children aged 5-16 years old. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal. 2012;17:e871–7.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  21. 21.↵
    Mani SA, Naing L, John J, Samsudin AR. Comparison of two methods of dental age estimation in 7-15-year-old Malays. Int J Paediatr Dent. 2008;18:380–8.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  22. 22.↵
    Chen JW, Guo J, Zhou J, Liu RK, Chen TT, Zou SJ. Assessment of dental maturity of western Chinese children using Demirjian’s method. Forensic Sci Int. 2010;197:119.e1–4.
    OpenUrl
  23. 23.↵
    Nik-Hussein NN, Kee KM, Gan P. Validity of Demirjian and Willems methods for dental age estimation for Malaysian children aged 5-15 years old. Forensic Sci Int. 2011;204:208.e1–6.
    OpenUrl
  24. 24.↵
    Hedge RJ, Sood PB. Dental maturity as an indicator of chronological age: Radiographic evaluation of dental age in 6 to 13 years children of Belgaum using Demirjian methods. J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent. 2002 20:132–8.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  25. 25.↵
    Sinha S, Umapathy D, Shashikanth MC, Misra N, Mehra A, Singh AK. Dental age estimation by Demirjian’s and Nolla’s method: A comparative study among children attending a dental college in Lucknow (UP). Indian Acad Oral Med Radiol. 2014 26:279– 86.
    OpenUrl
  26. 26.↵
    Luthfi M, Suhartono W, Puspita AD, Auerkari EI. Third Molar Development Age Range on Indonesian Population from Various Ethnics Based on Radiograph Findings: A Preliminary Study. Journal of International Dental and Medical Research. 2017;10(2):299–302.
    OpenUrl
  27. 27.
    Yuniarti A, Arifin AZ, Wijaya AY, Khotimah WN. An Age Estimation Method to Panoramic Radiographs from Indonesian Individuals. Telkomnika. 2013;11(1):199–206.
    OpenUrl
  28. 28.↵
    Yunus B, Wardhani Y. Differences chronological age and dental age using Demirjian method based upon a study radiology using radiography panoramic at the Dental Hospital Hasanuddin University. J Dentomaxillofac Sci. 2016;1(2):103–108.
    OpenUrl
  29. 29.↵
    Carpenter GH. The secretion, components, and properties of saliva. Annu Rev Food Sci Technol. 2013;4:267–76.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  30. 30.↵
    Jwa HJ, Yang SI, Lim HH. The difference in serum alkaline phosphatase levels between girls with precocious puberty and those with normal puberty. Ann Pediatr Endocrinol Metab. 2013;18(4):191–5.
    OpenUrl
  31. 31.↵
    Prakash AR, Indupuru K, Sreenath G, Kanth MR, Reddy AVS, Indira Y. Salivary alkaline phosphatase levels speak about association of smoking, diabetes and potentially malignant diseases? J Oral Maxillofac Pathol. 2016 Jan-Apr; 20(1): 66–70.
    OpenUrl
  32. 32.↵
    Sophia K, Suresh S, Sudhakar U, Jayakumar P, Mathew D. Comparative Analysis of Salivary Alkaline Phosphatase in Post menopausal Women with and without Periodontitis. J ClinDiagnRes. 2017 Jan; 11(1): ZC122–4.
    OpenUrl
  33. 33.↵
    Roudsari JM and Mahjoub S. Quantification and comparison of bone-specific alkaline phosphatase with two methods in normal and paget’s specimens. Caspian J Intern Med. 2012;3(3):478–83.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  34. 34.↵
    Turan S, Topcu B, Gökçe I, Güran T,Atay Z, Omar A, Akçay T and Bereket A. Serum Alkaline Phosphatase Levels in Healthy Children and Evaluation of Alkaline Phosphatasez-scores in Different Types of Rickets. J Clin Res Pediatr Endocrinol. 2011;3(1):7–11.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  35. 35.↵
    Onomatopoeia. (n.d.) In Merriam-Webster’s Collegiate Dictionary of English Usage (11thed). Springfield, MA: Merriam-Webster Incorporated. Last accessed at 24 August 2019. Retrieved from: https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/chronological%20age
  36. 36.↵
    Demirjian A, Goldstein H, Tanner JM. A new system of dental age assessment. Hum Biol. 1973;45:211–27.
    OpenUrl
  37. 37.↵
    Moze K, Roberts G. Dental age assessment (DAA) of Afro-Trinidadian children and adolescents. Development of a reference dataset (RDS) and comparison with Caucasians resident in London, UK. J Forensic Leg Med. 2012;19:272–9.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  38. 38.↵
    Birch W. A method of calculating human deciduous crown formation times and of estimating the chronological ages of stressful events occurring during deciduous enamel formation. J Forensic Leg Med. 2014;22:127–144.
    OpenUrl
  39. 39.↵
    Liversidge HM. Interpreting group differences using Demirjian’s dental maturity method. Forensic Sci Int. 2010;201:95–101.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  40. 40.↵
    1. Irish JD,
    2. Nelson GC
    Liversidge HM. Dental age revisited. In: Irish JD, Nelson GC, editors. Technique and application in dental anthropology. Cambridge University Press:Cambridge. 2008:234–52.
  41. 41.↵
    Hegde MN, Tahiliani D, Shetty S, Devadiga D. Salivary alkaline phosphatase and calcium in caries-active type II diabetes mellitus patients: An in vivo study. Contemp Clin Dent. 2014;5(4):440–4.
    OpenUrl
  42. 42.↵
    Kaufman E, Lamster IB. Analysis of saliva for periodontal diagnosis – A review. J Clin Periodontol. 2000;27:453–65.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  43. 43.↵
    De A, Puttannavar R, Rahman F, Adak A, Sahoo R, Prakash BSR. Estimation of salivary and serum alkaline phosphatase level as a diagnostic marker in type-2 diabetes mellitus with periodontal health and disease: A clinico-biochemical study. J Oral MaxillofacPathol. 2018 Sep-Dec; 22(3): 445.
    OpenUrl
  44. 44.↵
    Willershausen I, Försch M, Willershausen B. Possibilities of Dental Age Assessment in Permanent Teeth: A Review. Dentistry. 2012;S1:001.
    OpenUrl
  45. 45.↵
    Chaillet N, Nystrom M, Kataja M, Demirjian A. Dental maturity curves in Finnish children: Demirjian’s method revisited and polynomial functions for age estimation. J Forensic Sci. 2004;49:1324–31.
    OpenUrlPubMed
Back to top
Posted January 15, 2021.
Download PDF
Data/Code
Email
The Relationship between Chronological Age, Dental Age, and Salivary Alkaline Phosphatase in Indonesian Children Aged 8-14 Years: A Cross-Sectional Study
Sindy Cornelia Nelwan, Soegeng Wahluyo, Firli Cahaya Khairani, Ricardo Adrian Nugraha, Haryono Utomo, Udijanto Tedjosasongko
medRxiv 2021.01.14.21249792; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.01.14.21249792
Twitter logo Facebook logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
Citation Tools

Subject Area