ABSTRACT
Background Major depression (MD) is a heterogeneous disorder; however, the extent to which genetic factors distinguish MD patient subgroups (genetic heterogeneity) remains uncertain. This study sought evidence for genetic heterogeneity in MD.
Methods Using UK Biobank cohort, the authors defined 16 MD subtypes within eight comparison groups (vegetative symptoms, symptom severity, comorbid anxiety disorder, age at onset, recurrence, suicidality, impairment and postpartum depression; N∼3,000-47,000). To compare genetic architecture of these subtypes, subtype-specific genome-wide association studies were performed to estimate SNP-heritability, and genetic correlations within subtype comparison and with other related disorders or traits.
Results MD subtypes were divergent in their SNP-heritability, and genetic correlations both within subtype comparisons and with other related disorders/traits. Three subtype comparisons (age at onset, suicidality, and impairment) showed significant differences in SNP-heritability; while genetic correlations within subtypes comparisons ranged from 0.55 to 0.86, suggesting genetic profiles are only partially shared among MD subtypes. Furthermore, subtypes that are more clinically challenging, e.g., early-onset, recurrent, suicidal, more severely impaired, had stronger genetic correlations with other psychiatric disorders. MD with atypical features showed a positive genetic correlation (+0.40) with BMI while a negative correlation (−0.09) was found in those with non-atypical symptoms. Novel genomic loci with subtype-specific effects were identified.
Conclusions These results provide the most comprehensive evidence to date for genetic heterogeneity within MD, and suggest that the phenotypic complexity of MD can be effectively reduced by studying the subtypes which share partially distinct etiologies.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
This research has been conducted using the UK Biobank Resource under Application Number 22224. This study was funded by the US NIMH grant (R01 MH123724) and the European Union's Horizon 2020 research and innovation program under grant agreement No 847776. PFS was supported by the Swedish Research Council (Vetenskapsradet, award D0886501), the Horizon 2020 Program of the European Union (COSYN, RIA grant agreement no. 610307), and US NIMH (U01 MH109528 and R01 MH077139). YL is in part supported by a 2018 NARSAD Young Investigator Grant from the Brain & Behaviour Research Foundation and US NIMH (R01 MH123724). The computations were enabled by resources provided by the Swedish National Infrastructure for Computing (SNIC) at UPPMAX server partially funded by the Swedish Research Council through grant agreement no. 2018-05973.
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
This research has been conducted using the UK Biobank Resource under Application Number 22224. Details about ethical approval of UK Biobank research could be found here https://www.ukbiobank.ac.uk/learn-more-about-uk-biobank/about-us/ethics
All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.
Yes
Data Availability
Data used for this manuscript is not available for public access. Please contact the corresponding author for questions regarding data. Code that was used to generate the results is available on GitHub link below.