Neurophysiological biomarkers of post-concussion syndrome: a scoping review
===========================================================================

* Sepehr Mortaheb
* Maria Maddalena Filippini
* Jean-François Kaux
* Jitka Annen
* Nicolas Lejeune
* Géraldine Martens
* Maria Antonia Fuentes Calderón
* Steven Laureys
* Aurore Thibaut

## Abstract

**Background and objectives** Post-concussion syndrome (PCS) consists of neurologic and psychological complaints persisting after a mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI). It affects up to 50% of mTBI patients, causes long-term disability and reduces quality of life. The aim of this scoping review was to examine possible uses of different neuroimaging modalities in PCS.

**Methods** Articles from Pubmed database were screened to extract studies that investigated the relationship between any neuroimaging features and symptoms of PCS. Descriptive statistics were applied to report results.

**Results** 88 out of 939 papers were included in the final review. 12 examined conventional MRI (42% specificity), 27 diffusion weighted imaging (56% specificity), 25 functional MRI (84% specificity), 10 electro(magneto)encephalography (80% specificity), and 14 examined other techniques (71% specificity).

**Conclusion** MRI was the most widely used technique, while functional techniques seem to be the most sensitive tools to evaluate PCS. Common patterns associated with symptoms of PCS were a decreased anticorrelation between the default mode network and the task positive network and reduced brain activity in specific areas (most often prefrontal cortex).

**Significance** Our findings highlight the importance to use functional approaches which demonstrated a functional alternation in brain connectivity and activity in most studies assessing PCS.

**Highlights**

*   post-concussion syndrome causes long term problems for up to 50% of patients after concussion.

*   Among different neuroimaging techniques, fMRI and EEG show to be the most sensitive tools for PCS assessment.

*   Heterogeneity of axonal injury, symptoms, and populations limits having a specific prognostic criteria for the PCS patients.

Keywords
*   neuroimaging
*   post-concussion syndrome
*   diffusion weighted imaging
*   functional MRI
*   electroencephalography
*   mTBI

## 1. Introduction

Emerging evidence shows that the long-term consequences of concussion – also known as mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI) – can be broad and long-lasting (Hiploylee et al. 2017). Those consequences are known as post-concussion syndrome (PCS); they most frequently comprise complaints as headaches, dizziness, fatigue, irritability, anxiety, insomnia as well as loss of concentration and memory, which can have important socio-economic impact (Junn et al. 2015). Up to 50% of the patients who had a concussion suffer from PCS at 3 months after injury (Voormolen et al. 2019). One study highlighted that 27% of patients who had a concussion could not resume to previous work even after 12 months post-injury; furthermore, among the patients who resumed to previous work, 84% still reported PCS related complaints (Van Der Naalt, Van Zomeren, and Sluiter 1999). These authors also showed that, beside demographics predictors (e.g., age and education) and injury characteristics (e.g., cause and severity of injury), indicators of psychological distress and employment were of influence on work resumption. Proper diagnosis of a concussion is the first step to accurate disease management which can enable further reemployment of subjects and can reduce economic burden on the society. Lack of knowledge (e.g., inaccurate belief that concussion is systematically linked to loss of consciousness) and un-familiarity with common guidelines in sports’ teams (despite of increasing interest of international federations in establishing new guidelines and regulations in the problem of concussion) are also a serious issue which limits proper diagnosis and appropriate management of patients who suffered from mTBI (McCrea et al. 2004, Kaut et al. 2003).

Heterogeneity of injury and symptoms and current limitations in the sensitivity of imaging and lack of sensitivity of classical biological markers are challenges for the development of diagnostic tools and biomarkers of good and poor recovery. Acute conventional CT (Computed Tomography) findings do not correlate with long-term outcomes such as PCS (Kurča, Sivák, and Kučera 2006; Lee et al. 2008). An extensive meta-analysis suggests that CT should only be performed under certain circumstances, when patients are at risk of severe intracranial injuries and present specific symptoms such as loss of consciousness for more than 5 minutes, declining in neurological status or seizures among others (Easter et al. 2015). Beside CT, other techniques offer alternatives to study brain structural and functional integrity such as MRI (conventional MRI, functional MRI [fMRI], diffusion weighted imaging [DWI], magnetic resonance spectros-copy [MRS]), single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT), positron emission tomography (PET), magnetoencephalography (MEG), electroencephalography (EEG) or functional near-infrared spectroscopy (fNIRS). Our scoping review aims to address which neuroimaging features of mTBI are relevant to the clinical expression of PCS and could therefore potentially be used as biomarkers for PCS diagnosis and/or prognosis whether cross sectionally or longitudinally.

## 2. Materials and Methods

Search on PubMed database was performed on June 13th 2018 and updated on May 14th 2020 including the following terms: mTBI, mild traumatic brain injury, post concussive syndrome, postconcussion syndrome, post-concussive syndrome, and neuroimaging, magnetic resonance imaging, functional magnetic resonance imaging, diffusion tensor imaging, diffusion spectrum imaging diffusion weighted imaging, susceptibility weighted imaging, diffusion kurtosis imaging, positron emission tomography, computed tomography, single photon emission computed tomography, magnetoencephalography, electroencephalography, near-infrared spectroscopy, functional near-infrared spectroscopy, resting state, functional connectivity.

Inclusion criteria were: 1. articles published in the last 10 years, 2. in humans (adults), 3. on post-concussion syndrome, 4. patients had to be assessed with one of the following techniques: CT, MRI, PET, SPECT, MEG, NIRS or EEG, 5. Published in English.

Exclusion criteria were: 1. articles including less than 12 subjects to exclude case studies and pilot studies (based on the criteria discussed in Julious 2005), and 2. reviews, opinion papers, or case-reports.

Our outcome measure concerned any association between neuroimaging and/or neurophysiological biomarkers and the severity of the symptoms as measured cross sectionally or longitudinally with the following scales (non-exhaustive list): Post-Concussion Symptom Scale, Post-concussive Symptom Questionnaire (PCSQ), PCS-19, PCS-Negative Impression Management (PCS-NIM) Scale, Sport Concussion Assessment Tool (all versions), International Classification of Diseases-10th edition (ICD-10) diagnostic criteria for post-concussion syndrome, Diagnostic and Statistical Manual for mental disorders – IVth edition (DSM-IV), diagnostic criteria for post-concussional disorder, Rivermead Post-Concussion Symptoms Questionnaire (RPQ), British Columbia Post-concussion Symptom Inventory (BC-PSI), Neurobehavioral Symptom Inventory, and Immediate Post-Concussion Assessment and Cognitive Testing (ImPACT).

Two independent blind reviewers (SM, MF) first reviewed the abstracts for inclusion using the Rayyan software (Ouzzani, et al. 2016). In case of disagreement, a third reviewer (AT) was involved in the decision. Descriptive statistics were used to report the results.

## 3. Results

The search yielded 939 articles, from which 851 were excluded and 88 articles were kept for final review (see Fig.1). The imaging techniques used in these 88 studies were conventional MRI (12 papers; 539 participants), DWI (27 papers; 1369 participants), functional MRI (25 papers; 876 participants), EEG/MEG (10 papers; 425 participants), PET (3 papers; 70 participants), SPECT (3 papers; 155 participants), fNIRS (2 papers; 37 participants), MRS (2 papers; 73 participants), and CT (4 papers, 2997 participants; See Fig.2).

![Figure 1.](http://medrxiv.org/http://medrxiv.stage.highwire.org/content/medrxiv/early/2021/03/29/2021.03.25.21254285/F1.medium.gif)

[Figure 1.](http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2021/03/29/2021.03.25.21254285/F1)

Figure 1. Prisma Flowchart:
Systematic search over the Pubmed database yielded 939 studies after which they were screened in the first round based on their abstracts and in the second round based on the main text of the remaining studies. Exclusion criteria were: articles including less than 12 subjects, reviews, opinion papers, and case-reports.

![Figure 2.](http://medrxiv.org/http://medrxiv.stage.highwire.org/content/medrxiv/early/2021/03/29/2021.03.25.21254285/F2.medium.gif)

[Figure 2.](http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2021/03/29/2021.03.25.21254285/F2)

Figure 2. Number of Studies per Imaging Technique:
The number of studies we could retrieve per study shows that functional MRI has the highest number of experiments with positive results (i.e. studies which found an association between neuroimaging features and post concussive symptoms). Darker colors show the number of studies with positive results while lighter colors show the studies without significant findings.

We here present results for conventional MRI, DWI, fMRI and EEG/MEG (see Table 1, and for definition of some specific outcome measures mentioned in this table, see Table 2). For the other techniques, only a couple of papers were found which limits the generalizability of the results. The main findings are summarized bellow based on the imaging technique and more extensive results are mentioned in Table 1. In the following, “positive results” means the studies who could find a significant association between at least one neuroimaging marker and PCS.

View this table:
[Table 1.](http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2021/03/29/2021.03.25.21254285/T1)

Table 1. 
Studies included in the final review, sorted by neuroimaging technique.

Abbreviations: AD = axial diffusivity; AI = axonal injury; BOLD = blood oxygenation level dependent; DAN = dorsal attentional network; DMN = default mode network; DWI = diffusion weighted imaging; EEG = electroencephalography; ERP = event related potentials; FA = fractional anisotropy; FC = functional connectivity; FLAIR = fluid-attenuated inversion recovery; GM = grey matter; GO = good outcome; ICB = intracranial bleeds; IFO = inferior fronto-occipital fasciculus; ImPACT = immediate postconcussion assessment and cognitive testing; MD = mean diffusivity; MEG = magnetoencephalography; MKT = mean kurtosis tensor; MRI = magnetic resonance imaging; mTBI = mild traumatic brain injury; N = number of patients with mTBI enrolled in the study; na = not available; OFC = orbito-frontal cortex; PCD = post-concussion disorder; PCS = post-concussion syndrome; PCS+ = PCS positive; PCS- = PCS negative; PO = poor outcome; PTSD = post-traumatic stress disorder; RD = radial diffusivity; ROI = region of interest; RPQ = Rivermead Post Concussion Symptoms Questionnaire; RSN = resting state network; SCAT = sport concussion assessment tool; SWI = susceptibility-weighted imaging; TBI = traumatic brain injury; Time related abbreviations (T1 = baseline time point; Tn = follow-up time points; h = hour(s); d = day(s); w = week(s); m = month(s); y = year(s)); vmPFC = ventromedial prefrontal cortex; WM = white matter

View this table:
[Table 2.](http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2021/03/29/2021.03.25.21254285/T2)

Table 2. 
Definition of some specific outcome measures in the reviewed papers.

### 3.1 Conventional MRI

Among 12 studies retrieved, 5 showed positive results (42% specificity). The results consist of smaller volume of cingulate gyrus isthmus, ventromedial prefrontal cortex (vmPFC) and fusiform gyrus, lower thickness of frontal, parietal, and temporal regions, and higher number of intracranial bleeds (ICB) in PCS patients. MRI was acquired from total of 539 subjects, 181 of whom were for those studies with positive results (34% subject specificity).

### 3.2 Diffusion Weighted Imaging

Among 27 studies retrieved, 15 showed positive results (56% specificity). The results consist of alterations of anisotropy and diffusion measures mainly in corpus callosum, longitudinal fasciculi, and tracts in the internal capsule. Data were acquired from total of 1369 subjects, 739 of whom were for those studies with positive results (54% subject specificity).

### 3.3 Functional MRI

Among 25 studies retrieved, 21 showed positive results (84% specificity). The results consist of alterations of anti-correlation which exists between default mode network and task positive network in normal conditions, and abnormal increase of thalamo-cortical connectivity (See Fig. 3). These functional data were acquired from total of 876 subjects, 773 of whom were for those studies with positive results (88% subject specificity).

![Figure 3.](http://medrxiv.org/http://medrxiv.stage.highwire.org/content/medrxiv/early/2021/03/29/2021.03.25.21254285/F3.medium.gif)

[Figure 3.](http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2021/03/29/2021.03.25.21254285/F3)

Figure 3. Main Findings of fMRI Studies:
Based on the studies used fMRI to explore PCS, the main findings can be summarized as the abnormal increase of thalamo-cortical connectivity, alterations in the anticorrelation of default mode network and task positive network, and decrease of activity in the prefrontal cortex.

### 3.4 Electro(Magneto)encephalography

Among 10 studies retrieved (6 EEG, 4 MEG), 8 showed positive results (4 EEG, 4 MEG; 80% specificity). The results consist of reduction of ERP components such as P300, N350, N2b, N1, and mismatch negativity, increase of relative theta power, decrease of relative alpha power, decrease of beta band inter-hemispheric coherency, and abnormal slow-wave activity in orbito-frontal cortex (OFC), vmPFC, and fusiform gyrus. These data were acquired from total of 425 subjects, 375 of whom were for those studies with positive results (88% subject specificity).

## 4. Discussion

This article aims to review the current state of the art in the neuroimaging and neurophysiological aid to the diagnosis of PCS. Out of 88 papers studied in this scoping review, most of them were about structural/functional MRI and EEG/MEG. Most positive findings were found among studies using functional approaches, such as fMRI, EEG/MEG. However, the number of studies using electrophysio-logical techniques (i.e., EEG) remains limited compared to neuroimaging studies (i.e., fMRI), while the former are more practical and more available in clinical practice. The main findings per technique are discussed below respectively for conventional MRI, DWI, fMRI, and EEG/MEG.

### 4.1 Conventional MRI and DWI

Considering both conventional MRI and DWI studies, only 51% of the structural MRI studies [920 subjects (48% of the total subjects)] identified specific abnormalities in patients with PCS. Although DWI studies showed more specificity compared to the conventional MRI (56% vs 42%), they still have a low specificity compared to functional MRI acquisitions (56% vs 84%). Structural MRI allows to evaluate anatomical and structural brain damage in a qualitative or quantitative way. Based on specific sequence that can be used for data acquisition, different anatomical features can be studied. For example, a conventional MRI sequence is suitable to quantify and analyse volume and thickness changes of different brain regions. It is known that brain volume loss (whether globally or regionally) is a conse-quence of moderate or severe brain injuries (Zhou et al. 2013). For example, anterior cingulate and left cingulate gyrus isthmus in the white matter are among the regions which show atrophy over time after injury (Zhou et al. 2013). Because anterior parts of the cingulum play vital roles in different cognitive systems (e.g. working memory; Egner and Hirsch 2005), atrophy in this area can explain different persistent symptoms after the concussion. Grey matter volume within vmPFC and the fusiform gyrus was also found to positively correlate with PCS symptoms, specifically emotional functioning (Killgore et al. 2016). This is due to the fact that vmPFC has a strong connection with amygdala and involves in self-control and decision making (Motzkin et al. 2015). Furthermore, cortical thickness in frontal, parietal, and temporal regions is found to be inversely associated with self-reported symptoms in young adults with PCS (Albaugh et al. 2015). This widespread effect was linked to the repetitive blows to the head specially for the athletes in full contact sports. Besides studying changes of the volume or thickness of different brain regions, intracranial bleeds can also be analysed using susceptibility-weighted sequences. ICBs usually can be missed in CT, conventional MRI, or T2* weighted images (Liu et al. 2014). Using susceptibility-weighted images, it was shown that the number and size of the intracranial bleeds are correlated with PCS severity (Liu et al. 2014).

A widely used MRI sequence to study structural changes in the brain of PCS patients is DWI which is mainly used to study changes of the white matter tracts. To analyse these tracts quantitatively, four main parameters of fractional anisotropy, axial diffusivity, radial diffusivity, and mean diffusivity are mainly explored. FA shows the degree of anisotropy of water molecules in the white matter which ranges from 0 (isotropic movement) to 1 (anisotropic movements). Alterations in FA can infer alterations in the axonal diameter, fiber density or myelin structure. On the other hand, diffusion parameters give a value of water molecule diffusion along the main tract (AD), perpendicular to the main tract (RD), or in average (MD). PCS-associated white matter abnormalities can mainly be characterized by decrease in FA values and increase in MD, AD, and RD values in the injured tracts (FA and MD were the most reported parameters to be altered compared to others). The main reported tracts with axonal injury in the PCS patients were Corpus Callosum (Smits et al. 2011, Messé et al. 2011, Messé et al. 2012, Yeh et al. 2014, and Lange et al. 2015, Yin et al. 2019), longitudinal fasciculi (Smits et al. 2011, Messé et al. 2011, Messé et al. 2012, Lange et al. 2015, Alhilali et al. 2015, and Yeh et al. 2017), and tracts in the internal capsule (Smits et al. 2011, Messé et al. 2012, Yeh et al. 2014, Lange et al. 2015, and Alhilali et al. 2015, Yin et al. 2019). As these tracts are the main pathways of a widespread cortical and subcortical connections, any axonal damage in these tracts can lead to various cognitive symptoms in patients with PCS. These axonal damages are mainly due to the rotational acceleration and/or deceleration forces happening when the concussion occurs (Smits et al. 2011). In addition to these main tracts, altered measures of anisotropy and diffusivity were also reported in fronto-occipital fasciculi (Smits et al. 2011, Messé et al. 2011, Yin et al. 2019), uncinate fasciculus (Smits et al. 2011, Thomas et al. 2017, Yeh et al. 2017), cortico-spinal tract (Messé et al. 2011), thalamic radiation (Messé et al. 2011, Yeh et al. 2014, Lange et al. 2015, Yeh et al. 2017), cingulum bundle (Yeh et al. 2014), pontine tegmentum (Delano-Wood et al. 2015), and primary and association cortices (Fakhrin et al. 2013). As we can see and also highlighted by (Miller et al. 2016), axonal damages in patients with PCS are spatially heterogeneous and divers which could be due to the heterogeneity of the studied populations (athletes versus normal people versus veterans) and the heterogeneity of the symptoms (e.g., stress, headache, sleep disturbances, attentional issues). By applying tractography algorithms on the DWI images, structural connectivity can also be analysed between different cortical regions. Using this technique, it has been shown that, compared to the PTSD-only (post-traumatic stress disorder) patients, subjects with PCS and PTSD have greater diversity in their structural connectivity between the hippocampus and striatum, which could be associated with PCS but not PTSD (Rangaprakash et al. 2017).

In summary, the structural neuroimaging studies evaluating grey matter and white matter integrity found impairments of the cingulate gyrus and the prefrontal area, while for the white matter the corpus callosum, the longitudinal fasciculi, and internal capsule were the most frequently reported structures to be impaired or linked to PCS severity. In general, diverse structural sites have been reported to be affected by concussion and lead to PCS. This could be due to the heterogeneity of the studied populations (athletes versus regular people versus veterans) and the heterogeneity of the symptoms (e.g., stress, headache, sleep disturbances, attentional issues).

### 4.2 Functional MRI

In fMRI studies, results can be presented based on changes in BOLD activation level or based on functional connectivity among regions (i.e., network-based analysis). Furthermore, functional networks can be summarized by graph analysis metrics which create a mathematical framework to study brain networks topology in normal and pathological states in more details. We discuss fMRI findings of PCS under these different categories.

#### 4.2.1 BOLD Activation Level Analysis

Among the studies using this technique, most of them looked at working memory and selective attention deficits which are the two main cognitive domains affected after mTBI (Smits et al. 2009). Based on previous studies, brain areas which are involved in these cognitive domains are mainly dorsolateral and ventrolateral prefrontal cortex, supplementary motor area, premotor area, posterior parietal area and anterior cingulate cortex (Egner and Hirsch 2005; Owen et al. 2005; Smits et al. 2009). Activation level of these areas during tasks requiring a high cognitive load are correlated with PCS severity showing increased attentional and short-term memory demands (Pardini et al. 2010; Smits et al. 2009). Some studies showed a hyper activation also in parahippocampal gyrus and posterior cingulate cortex (PCC) which are mainly related to episodic memory and memory retrieval (Smits et al. 2009). Activation of these regions in high-load working memory and selective attention tasks shows a potential cerebral compensatory response to possible microstructural injury in patients with PCS (Smits et al. 2009). Hyperactivity was also observed in the left angular gyrus which resulted in the same behavioural accuracy for patients with PCS and healthy subjects in performing a working memory task (Gosselin et al. 2012). Taking all together, it can be stated that patients with PCS use more cognitive resources to perform an attention or working memory task with the same accuracy as the healthy subjects (Pardini et al. 2010).

Decrease in BOLD activation level in the medial prefrontal cortex was also observed in patients with PCS (Gosselin et al. 2011; Van der Horn et al. 2016). We know that this region is important for executive functioning and emotion regulation (Euston, Gruber, and McNaughton 2012; Van Der Werf et al. 2000). In addition, it is a core area of the default mode network and an important relay station between DMN and other executive networks (Van der Horn et al. 2016). As a result, impairment in this area can lead to cognitive and affective impairments (Gosselin et al. 2011; Van der Horn et al. 2016). Using transcranial magnetic stimulation as a treatment, an increase of the medial prefrontal cortex activation level during a working memory task was found and was associated with less severe PCS symptoms (Koski et al. 2015).

Besides working memory and selective attention, light sensitivity and headaches were also studied using a visual tracking task (Astafiev et al. 2016). Higher BOLD activity in the middle temporal/lateral occipital regions was observed compared to healthy subjects when patients were exposed to visual stimuli. These regions are known as extra-striate visual regions involved in motion and object processing (Astafiev et al. 2016). Higher activation in these regions was also associated with higher FA values in the same region (Astafiev et al. 2016). In sum, the light sensitivity and associated headaches could be related to an abnormal sensitivity of motion sensitive neurons.

#### 4.2.2 Functional Connectivity Analysis

In a general view, abnormal functional connectivity can be found in almost all the functional networks which can be detected in the resting state (Stevens et al. 2012). While few studies have reported an abnormal whole brain hyper-connectivity especially in acute phase (Kaushal et al. 2019), other studies have shown an overall whole-brain connectivity reduction in these patients (Palacios et al. 2017; Sours, Chen, et al. 2015). Whole-brain connectivity analysis gives us a general view of the functional organization of the brain; however, focusing on specific networks or regions, chosen in a hypothesis driven way, gives more insights about network configuration changes and more fine-grained understanding of the pathology of PCS. Among different networks and regions, DMN and the thalamus are the most studied ones.

##### Default Mode Network – DMN

The DMN is a network mainly related to the internal awareness (Vanhaudenhuyse et al. 2011). Posterior regions of the DMN, such as the precuneus, showed more vulnerability to traumatic injury (Zhou et al. 2012). Decrease of the connectivity of the precuneus inside the DMN and its increased connectivity with primary and secondary visual networks and left frontoparietal network can alter the transition of attention from internal to external awareness (Zhou et al. 2012). Another critical area in the DMN is the PCC. Decreased connectivity of the PCC within the DMN is associated with increased connectivity of medial prefrontal cortex (MPFC), which potentially shows the compensatory role of the MPFC to the impaired neurocognitive functions. Indeed, the MPFC and the PCC are intrinsically interdependent inside the DMN and their function is highly complementary (Zhou et al. 2012). Anterior regions of the DMN such as the anterior cingulate cortex (ACC) have also shown altered connectivity in these patients. Connectivity of the ACC with emotional, primary visual, and higher order processing networks is negatively correlated with the severity of the PCS (Stevens et al. 2012). Considering the role of the ACC in pain processing, error and conflict detection, behavioural and cognitive control, as well as emotional processing, this could potentially explain different complaints in mTBI patients. In addition to the role of the DMN in internal awareness, the interaction between the DMN and the task positive network (TPN) is crucial for performing executive functions. In fact, the balance between internal and external awareness is supported by the interaction of these two networks with temporally alternating higher activity states (Di and Biswal 2014). In patients with PCS, the deactivation of the DMN is not strong enough while they are performing a working memory task (Van der Horn et al. 2016). Specifically, an increase in the connectivity between the DMN and the TPN has been observed (Van der Horn et al. 2016; Sours, George, et al. 2015, Manning et al. 2019). This altered anti-correlation between the DMN and the TPN (i.e. the lack of silencing of the DMN) could explain some of the difficulties in task performance that patients with PCS suffer from.

##### Thalamus

This subcortical hub plays an important role in memory, executive functions, attention, and emotion, among others (Van Der Werf et al. 2000). Different studies have shown a PCS related increase of the thalamo-cortical connectivity (Sours, George, et al. 2015; Tang et al. 2011; Zhou 2017) which can lead to an inefficient neuronal activity (Zhou 2017). The increased thalamo-cortical connectivity can be related to the alteration of the GABAergic inhibitory neurons in the thalamus (Sours, George, et al. 2015; Tang et al. 2011), resulting in a reduction of inhibitory control over the thalamocortical activity. Connectivity of the thalamus with other networks has also been studied. Especially, evidence suggests that the connectivity between the thalamus and the DMN increases in patients with PCS (Banks et al. 2016; Sours, George, et al. 2015). As mentioned, well-coordinated interaction between the DMN and the TPN is necessary for an appropriate balance between internal and external awareness and proper task execution. Fronto-parietal control (FPC) network (Banks et al. 2016) and salience network (SN) (Seeley et al. 2007) were suggested as networks that control this balance between the DMN and the TPN. The thalamus has connections with all of these networks and has a key role in this complex interaction between networks. Increased connectivity between the thalamus and the DMN could lead to a malfunctioning of this modulatory interaction. In addition to the increased connectivity of both thalamus and DMN, a decrease of connectivity between the thalamus, the FPC and the DAN was also reported (Banks et al. 2016). A normalization of this decreased connectivity was correlated with better PCS scores, while the connectivity with the DMN remained unchanged.

##### Other Regions

Besides DMN and thalamus, hypo-connectivity of some anterior regions such as inferior and middle frontal gyri was also reported in PCS patients (Murdaugh et al. 2018). Inferior and middle frontal gyri are part of the active cognition network which should be anti-correlated with the DMN. Their abnormal connectivity disrupts the balance that should exist between the DMN and executive networks. Reduction of homotopic functional connectivity in pain processing regions is another finding which was shown to be normalized with symptom recovery and can be serve as another potential biomarker of PCS (Chong et al. 2019).

#### 4.2.3 Graph Analysis

One approach to study brain networks and their topological characteristics is, the data driven, graph analysis. In this approach, connectivity measures are represented by weighted graphs (nodes represent regions of interest or ROIs and edges represent connectivity between ROIs). For example, graph modularity (i.e. the strength of division of brain network into modules) is increased in the temporal regions in the subacute phase and are decreased in frontal regions in the chronic stage in patients with PCS (Messé et al. 2013). These changes can be localized mainly in regions related to executive functions, working memory, cognitive control and attention. Some mathematical features of the graph (detailed in Table 2) such as the clustering coefficient is also correlated with increased thalamo-cortical connectivity (Zhou 2017). Combining graph analysis results of the functional connectivity data with the diffusion weighted images revealed that regions of the brain showing lower local relative betweenness centrality in the functional network have also lower fractional anisotropy; in addition, decrease of global efficiency of functional networks is related to diffuse axonal injury (Zhou 2017). Average shortest path weights and minimum spanning tree weights have also been shown to be increased in patients with PCS (Hou et al. 2019). Taking all these results together, graph analysis shows that patients with PCS tend to have costly and less efficient network configurations for information transfer (Hou et al. 2019) which leads to cognitive impairments.

To summarize, findings of 84% papers which have reported significant results (with a total of 773 subjects) showed that impairment in functional connectivity after mTBI could potentially explain most of the post-concussive symptoms. Mainly, alterations of the connectivity in the DMN and its interaction with other executive networks, especially alterations of the anti-correlation between the DMN and the TPN, could be associated with cognitive impairments. In addition, increase of the thalamo-cortical connectivity due to alteration of GABAergic inhibitory neurons in the thalamus can also lead to difficulties in task performance. These functional impairments recruit compensatory mechanisms in the brain and use of extra cognitive resources while performing cognitive tasks.

### 4.3 Electro(Magneto)encephalography

In general, EEG/MEG data can be analysed in the sensor space (signals directly from surface sensors) or in the source space (i.e. signals of surface sensors are projected to the cortex to estimate the cortical location of the neural generators). Furthermore, different analysis methods can be performed on the standard frequency bands of the signals: delta (0-4 Hz), theta (4-8 Hz), alpha (8-12 Hz), beta (12-30 Hz), and gamma (>30 Hz). In addition, EEG/MEG recordings can be either in resting state or in response to stimuli, averaged over many trials, to measure event related potentials (ERP) in case of EEG recording or event related fields (ERF) in case of MEG recording. In ERP/ERF signals, the amplitude and latency of their different components are important and meaningful features to study. Although in the analysis methods, there are no serious differences between EEG and MEG signals, in terms of clinical applicability and data acquisition, they are completely different. While EEG is widely available and can be performed easily in different clinical settings, MEG is scarcely available for clinical purposes. In the present review, 8 out of 10 EEG/MEG studies identified neurophysiological changes linked to PCS (6 EEG studies with 4 reporting positive results and 4 MEG studies all reporting positive results).

Considering ERP studies, they were mainly focused on the amplitude of P300 (Gosselin et al. 2012, Ruiter et al. 2019), N350 (Gosselin et al. 2011, 2012), N2b, N1, and mismatch negativity (MMN) components (Ruiter et al. 2019). All of them reported a reduction in the amplitude of such components. A first ERP study found that amplitude of N350 component (mainly related to cognitive processing during sleep onset period (Harsh, et al. 1994)) in frontal electrodes was decreased in patients with PCS while performing a working memory task compared to a control task (Gosselin et al. 2011, 2012). Because this N350 amplitude reduction was correlated to the lower BOLD signal changes of the right mid-dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (mid-DLPFC) in the same task, it is thought that this specific ERP component is related to the neural activity of the mid-DLPFC. In addition, the amplitude of P300 (mainly related to consciously controlled attention) in parietal regions is decreased after brain injury and this reduction in amplitude is more significant when patients with PCS suffer from severe depressive symptoms (Gosselin et al. 2012). While both N2b and MMN are related to the pre-attentive processing, MMN is observed independent of the conscious attention and N2b is observed in intentional conscious attentions (Ruiter et al. 2019). As a result, reduction of amplitude of P300, N2b and MMN can be linked to the attentional deficits which are common in PCS. The N1 component mainly reflects auditory attention and shows a reduced amplitude in case of auditory processing difficulties (Ruiter et al. 2019). At the network level, brain network activation (BNA) is a task related EEG feature (Shahaf et al. 2012) that could act as a reliable biomarker of diagnosis and long-term tracking of brain networks after concussion (Reches et al. 2017). This parameter is indeed decreased in patients with PCS compared to healthy subjects immediately after injury in association with symptom severity, and may be linked to a reduced task-related brain activity and connectivity in these patients (Reches et al. 2017). In analysis of resting state EEG data, increase of relative theta power, decrease of relative alpha power and decrease of beta band inter-hemispheric coherence have been observed (Lewine et al. 2019).

Considering MEG recordings, it has been shown that total MEG magnitude in the source space is correlated with PCS scores (Huang et al. 2014). Still, slow-wave features are more informative for cognitive impairment examination in this cohort of patients (Robb Swan et al. 2015). For example, abnormal slow-wave activity in the orbitofrontal cortex and vmPFC has been shown to be associated with personality changes, concentration troubles, and emotional instability (Huang et al. 2014). Because these regions are highly connected to other cortical and subcortical areas, this abnormal activity can cause impairments in a vast domain of cognitive abilities (Huang et al. 2014). In addition, visual difficulties such as blurred vision have been explained by the abnormal slow-wave activity in the right fusiform gyrus (Huang et al. 2014), an important region for face, object, and body recognition and processing (Weiner and Grill-Spector 2010). Abnormal slow-wave generation in different regions has been associated with white matter abnormalities or micro-structure damages to the major tract in the same regions (Huang et al. 2009). Connectivity analysis features of MEG data in different frequency bands have also been shown to be informative biomarkers to study PCS after mTBI. Inter-regional resting-state phase synchrony in the alpha band could classify patients from healthy subjects with an accuracy of 80%, in which the distance of each participant to the classification boundary was correlated with the symptom severity of that subject (Vakorin et al. 2016). Functional connectivity of ROIs in prefrontal cortex, medial temporal lobe, putamen, and cerebellum with the whole brain was increased while functional connectivity of the right frontal pole with the rest of the brain in patients with PCS was decreased (Huang et al. 2017). These abnormal connectivity variations were observed in beta, gamma, and low frequency bands (i.e. 1-7 Hz). Decrease of the functional connectivity in the right frontal pole can be explained by diffuse axonal injury which leads to disruption of neural communications (Hannawi and Stevens 2016). On the other hand, the increase of functional connectivity in prefrontal cortex, medial temporal lobe, putamen, and cerebellum can be explained by the over excitation of glutamate in pyramidal neurons of the cortex which leads to an alteration of GABAergic interneurons (Huang et al. 2017).

Taking all the information together, different alterations in the EEG/MEG markers may be related to the white matter abnormalities and axonal injury, alterations of GABAergic neurons and functional dysfunction of some frontal regions such as the DLPFC.

### 4.4 Limitations

Our work had also some limitations. First of all, heterogeneity of studies population resulted in heterogeneity of symptoms and imaging markers. Secondly, few number of studies explored PCS longitudinally. These two limitations made us unable to have specific strong prognostic recommendations for PCS. Third limitation was the few number of studies used other imaging techniques than MRI and EEG. While imaging techniques like PET, SPECT, and fNIRS can give us more insight about the brain alterations in PCS, the few number of studies limited generalization of their findings and made us exclude them from our analysis. Finally, most of the studies we included in our survey didn’t have a specific hypothesis and the questions they were trying to answer were really divers. Therefore, we couldn’t perform a meta-analysis which could help us to understand PCS more deeply.

## 5. Concluding remarks

In this scoping review, we studied the most reliable approaches to evaluate PCS and the common findings among studies which could explain PCS (i.e., biomarkers of PCS). Most of the studies using structural MRI to investigate neural correlates of PCS did not find any specificities, except for an atrophy mainly involving the cingulate and prefrontal areas linked to PCS symptoms, and abnormalities in the anisotropy and diffusion parameters of corpus callosum, longitudinal fasciculi, and internal capsule. On the other hand, the majority of functional studies (fMRI and EEG/MEG) found abnormal increase in thalamo-cortical functional connectivity, which could be linked to employment of compensatory mechanisms needed to perform cognitive tasks. In addition, an altered anti-correlation between the DMN and the TPN could explain some of the difficulties in task performance experienced by patients with PCS. Besides, reduction of brain activity in specific areas was also found; the most frequently reported ones being the prefrontal cortex. Functional abnormalities in these abovementioned brain regions and networks, should draw physicians’ attention to provide appropriate cares to these at-risk patients. Note that, only six studies used EEG, although compared to MRI, or even MEG, this technique is easier to use in clinical practice. Further EEG studies could provide insightful prediction of PCS outcome that could be more easily implemented in clinical practice. EEG/ERP studies identified a reduction in ERP component amplitudes related to attentional processes. It should be noted that in most of the studies, no a priori or precise hypotheses were stated. We hope that our findings will guide authors to postulate specific hypotheses for future neuroimaging studies. So far, fMRI seems the most robust approach to study PCS severity and future prospective longitudinal studies in a large sample of concussed patients using clinically relevant techniques such as EEG, should determine prognostic factors of good and poor outcome following a concussion.

## Data Availability

Not applicable

## Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

## Acknowledgement

The study was further supported by:

The study was supported by the University and University Hospital of Liege, the Belgian National Funds for Scientific Research (FRS-FNRS), the European Union’s Horizon 2020 Framework Programme for Research and Innovation under the Specific Grant Agreement No. 945539 (Human Brain Project SGA3) and No. 686764 (Luminous project), DOCMA project [EU-H2020-MSCA– RISE–778234], the European Space Agency (ESA) and the Belgian Federal Science Policy Office (BELSPO) in the framework of the PRODEX Programme, “Fondazione Europea di Ricerca Biomedica”, the Bial Foundation, the Mind Science Foundation and the European Commission, the fund Generet, the Mind Care International Foundation and the King Baudouin Foundation.

The authors have no conflict of interest relevant to the present study to declare.

## List of abbreviations

ACC
:   anterior cingulate cortex
AD
:   axial diffusitivity
AI
:   axonal injury
BC-PSI
:   British Columbia postconcussion symptom inventory
BOLD
:   blood-oxygen-level dependent
CT
:   computed tomography
DAN
:   dorsal attentional network
DMN
:   default mode network
DLPFC
:   dorsolateral prefrontal cortex
DSM-IV
:   diagnostic and statistical manual for mental disorders – IVth edition
DTI
:   diffusion tensor imaging
DWI
:   diffusion weighted imaging
EEG
:   electroencephalography
ERF
:   event related field
ERP
:   event related potential
FA
:   fractional anisotropy
FC
:   functional connectivity
FLAIR
:   fluid-attenuation inversion recovery
fMRI
:   functional magnetic resonance imaging
fNIRS
:   functional near infrared spectroscopy
FPC
:   fronto-parietal cortex
GM
:   grey matter
GO
:   good outcome
ICBs
:   intracranial bleeds
ICD-10
:   international classification of diseases – 10th edition
IFO
:   inferior fronto-occipital fasciculus
ImPACT
:   immediate post-concussion assessment and cognitive testing
MD
:   mean diffusitivity
MEG
:   magnetoencephalography
MKT
:   mean kurtosis tensor
MMN
:   mismatch negativity
MPFC
:   medial prefrontal cortex
MRS
:   magnetic resonance spectroscopy
mTBI
:   mild traumatic brain injury
OFC
:   orbitofrontal cortex
PCC
:   posterior cingulate cortex
PCD
:   Post-concussion disorder
PCS
:   post-concussion syndrome
PCS-
:   post-concussion syndrome negative
PCS+
:   post-concussion syndrome positive
PCS-NIM
:   PCS-negative impression management
PCSQ
:   post-concussive symptom question-naire
PET
:   positron emission tomography
PO
:   poor outcome
PTSD
:   Post-traumatic stress disorder
RD
:   radial diffusitivity
ROI
:   region of interest
RPQ
:   Rivermead post concussion symptoms questionnaire
RSN
:   resting state network
SCAT
:   sport concussion assessment tool
SN
:   salience network
SP
:   shortest path
SPECT
:   single photon emission computed tomography
SWI
:   susceptibility-weighted imaging
TBI
:   Traumatic brain injury
TPN
:   task positive network
vmPFC
:   ventromedial prefrontal cortex
WM
:   white matter

*   Received March 25, 2021.
*   Revision received March 25, 2021.
*   Accepted March 29, 2021.


*   © 2021, Posted by Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory

This pre-print is available under a Creative Commons License (Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 4.0 International), CC BY-NC-ND 4.0, as described at [http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/](http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/)

## References

1.  Albaugh, Matthew D.,  Catherine Orr,  Joshua P. Nickerson,  Cole Zweber,  James R. Slauterbeck,  Scott Hipko,  Jay Gonyea,  Trevor An-drews,  J. Curtis Brackenbury,  Richard Watts, and  James J. Hudziak. 2015. “Postconcussion Symptoms Are Associated with Cere-bral Cortical Thickness in Healthy Collegiate and Preparatory School Ice Hockey Players.” Journal of Pediatrics 166(2):394–400.e1.
    
    

2.  Alhilali, Lea M.,  Joseph A. Delic,  Serter Gumus, and  Saeed Fakhran. 2015. “Evaluation of White Matter Injury Patterns Underlying Neu-ropsychiatric Symptoms after Mild Traumatic Brain Injury1.” Radiology 277(3):793–800.
    
    

3.  Astafiev, Serguei V.,  Kristina L. Zinn,  Gordon L. Shulman, and  Maurizio Corbetta. 2016. “Exploring the Physiological Correlates of Chronic Mild Traumatic Brain Injury Symptoms.” NeuroImage: Clinical 11:10–19.
    
    

4.  Banks, Sarah D.,  Rogelio A. Coronado,  Lori R. Clemons,  Christine M. Abraham,  Sumit Pruthi,  Benjamin N. Conrad,  Victoria L. Morgan,  Oscar D. Guillamondegui, and  Kristin R. Archer. 2016. “Thalamic Functional Connectivity in Mild Traumatic Brain Injury: Longi-tudinal Associations With Patient-Reported Outcomes and Neuropsychological Tests.” Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabil-itation 97(8):1254–61.
    
    

5.  Chai, Chao,  Rui Guo,  Chao Zuo,  Linlin Fan,  Saifeng Liu,  Tianyi Qian,  E. Mark Haacke,  Shuang Xia, and  Wen Shen. 2017. “Decreased Susceptibility of Major Veins in Mild Traumatic Brain Injury Is Correlated with Post-Concussive Symptoms:A Quantitative Sus-ceptibility Mapping Study.” NeuroImage: Clinical 15(June):625–32.
    
    

6.  Chong, C. D., Wang, L., Wang, K., Traub, S., & Li, J. 2019. “Homotopic region connectivity during concussion recovery: A longitudinal fMRI study.” oS one 14(10):e0221892.
    
    

7.  Clark, Alexandra L.,  Scott F. Sorg,  Dawn M. Schiehser,  Norman Luc,  Mark W. Bondi,  Mark Sanderson,  Madeleine L. Werhane, and  Lisa Delano-Wood. 2016. “Deep White Matter Hyperintensities Affect Verbal Memory Independent of PTSD Symptoms in Veterans with Mild Traumatic Brain Injury.” Brain Injury 30(7):864–71.
    
    [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.3109/02699052.2016.1144894&link_type=DOI) 
    
    [PubMed](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=27058006&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fmedrxiv%2Fearly%2F2021%2F03%2F29%2F2021.03.25.21254285.atom) 

8.  Datta, S. G. S.,  S. V. Pillai,  S. L. Rao,  J. M. E. Kovoor, and  B. A. Chandramouli. 2009. “Post-Concussion Syndrome: Correlation of Neuropsychologicaldeficits, Structural Lesions on Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Symptoms.” Neurology India 57(5):594–98.
    
    [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.4103/0028-3886.57810&link_type=DOI) 
    
    [PubMed](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=19934558&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fmedrxiv%2Fearly%2F2021%2F03%2F29%2F2021.03.25.21254285.atom) 
    
    [Web of Science](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=000272678200011&link_type=ISI) 

9.  Davenport, Nicholas D.,  Kelvin O. Lim, and  Scott R. Sponheim. 2015. “Personality and Neuroimaging Measures Differentiate PTSD from MTBI in Veterans.” Brain Imaging and Behavior 9(3):472–83.
    
    

10. de Haan, S.,  J. C. de Groot,  B. Jacobs, and  J. van der Naalt. 2017. “The Association between Microhaemorrhages and Post - Traumatic Functional Outcome in the Chronic Phase after Mild Traumatic Brain Injury.” Neuroradiology 59(10):963–69.
    
    

11. Delano-Wood, L.,  K. J. Bangen,  S. F. Sorg,  A. L. Clark,  D. M. Schiehser,  N. Luc,  M. W. Bondi,  M. Werhane,  R. T. Kim, and  E. D. Bigler. 2015. “Brainstem White Matter Integrity Is Related to Loss of Consciousness and Postconcussive Symptomatology in Vet-erans with Chronic Mild to Moderate Traumatic Brain Injury.” Brain Imaging and Behavior 9(3):500–512.
    
    

12. Di, Xin and  Bharat B. Biswal. 2014. “Modulatory Interactions between the Default Mode Network and Task Positive Networks in Rest-ing-State.” PeerJ 2014(1).
    
    

13. Easter, Joshua S.,  Jason S. Haukoos,  William P. Meehan,  Victor Novack, and  Jonathan A. Edlow. 2015. “Will Neuroimaging Reveal a Severe Intracranial Injury in This Adult with Minor Head Trauma? The Rational Clinical Examination Systematic Review.” JAMA - Journal of the American Medical Association 314(24):2672–81.
    
    

14. Egner, Tobias and  Joy Hirsch. 2005. “The Neural Correlates and Functional Integration of Cognitive Control in a Stroop Task.” Neu-roImage 24(2):539–47.
    
    [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1016/j.neuroimage.2004.09.007&link_type=DOI) 
    
    [PubMed](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=15627596&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fmedrxiv%2Fearly%2F2021%2F03%2F29%2F2021.03.25.21254285.atom) 
    
    [Web of Science](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=000226454500027&link_type=ISI) 

15. Euston, David R.,  Aaron J. Gruber, and  Bruce L. McNaughton. 2012. “The Role of Medial Prefrontal Cortex in Memory and Decision Making.” Neuron 76(6):1057–70.
    
    [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1016/j.neuron.2012.12.002&link_type=DOI) 
    
    [PubMed](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=23259943&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fmedrxiv%2Fearly%2F2021%2F03%2F29%2F2021.03.25.21254285.atom) 
    
    [Web of Science](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=000313154800005&link_type=ISI) 

16. Fakhran, Saeed,  Karl Yaeger, and  Lea Alhilali. 2013. “Symptomatic White Matter Changes in Mild Traumatic Brain Injury Resemble Pathologic Features of Early Alzheimer Dementia.” Radiology 269(1):249–57.
    
    [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1148/radiol.13122343&link_type=DOI) 
    
    [PubMed](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=23781117&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fmedrxiv%2Fearly%2F2021%2F03%2F29%2F2021.03.25.21254285.atom) 

17. Gosselin, Nadia,  Carolina Bottari,  Jen Kai Chen,  Michael Petrides,  Simon Tinawi, É laine De Guise, and  Alain Ptito. 2011. “Electrophysi-ology and Functional MRI in Post-Acute Mild Traumatic Brain Injury.” Journal of Neurotrauma 28(3):329–41.
    
    [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1089/neu.2010.1493&link_type=DOI) 
    
    [PubMed](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=21309680&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fmedrxiv%2Fearly%2F2021%2F03%2F29%2F2021.03.25.21254285.atom) 
    
    [Web of Science](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=000288370600001&link_type=ISI) 

18. Gosselin, Nadia,  Carolina Bottari Erg,  Jen Kai Chen,  Sonja Christina Huntgeburth,  Louis De Beaumont,  Michae L. Petrides,  Bob Cheung, and  Alain Ptito. 2012. “Evaluating the Cognitive Consequences of Mild Traumatic Brain Injury and Concussion by Using Electro-physiology.” Neurosurgical Focus 33(6).
    
    

19. Hannawi, Yousef and  Robert D. Stevens. 2016. “Mapping the Connectome Following Traumatic Brain Injury.” Current Neurology and Neuroscience Reports 16(5).
    
    

20. Harsh J., Voss U., Hull J., Shrepfer S., Badia P., 1994. “ERP and Behavioral Changes During the Wake/Sleep Transitions.” Psychophysi-ology 31(3):244–252
    
    [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1111/j.1469-8986.1994.tb02213.x&link_type=DOI) 
    
    [PubMed](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=8008788&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fmedrxiv%2Fearly%2F2021%2F03%2F29%2F2021.03.25.21254285.atom) 

21. Hellstrøm, T.,  L. T. Westlye,  S. Sigurdardottir,  C. Brunborg,  H. L. Soberg, Holthe,  A. Server,  M. J. Lund,  O. A. Andreassen, and  N. An-delic. 2017. “Longitudinal Changes in Brain Morphology from 4 Weeks to 12 Months after Mild Traumatic Brain Injury: Associa-tions with Cognitive Functions and Clinical Variables.” Brain Injury 31(5):674–85.
    
    [PubMed](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=http://www.n&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fmedrxiv%2Fearly%2F2021%2F03%2F29%2F2021.03.25.21254285.atom) 

22. Hiploylee, Carmen,  Paul A. Dufort,  Hannah S. Davis,  Richard A. Wennberg,  Maria Carmela Tartaglia,  David Mikulis,  Lili Naz Hazrati, and  Charles H. Tator. 2017. “Longitudinal Study of Postconcussion Syndrome: Not Everyone Recovers.” Journal of Neurotrauma 34(8):1511–23.
    
    [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1089/neu.2016.4677&link_type=DOI) 
    
    [PubMed](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=http://www.n&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fmedrxiv%2Fearly%2F2021%2F03%2F29%2F2021.03.25.21254285.atom) 

23. Hou, W., Sours Rhodes, C., Jiang, L., Roys, S., Zhuo, J., JaJa, J., & Gullapalli, R. P 2019. “Dynamic functional network analysis in mild traumatic brain injury.” Brain connectivity 9(6): 475–487.
    
    

24. Huang, Ming Xiong,  Rebecca J. Theilmann,  Ashley Robb,  Annemarie Angeles,  Sharon Nichols,  Angela Drake,  John D’Andrea,  Michael Levy,  Martin Holland,  Tao Song,  Sheng Ge,  Eric Hwang,  Kevin Yoo,  Li Cui,  Dewleen G. Baker,  Doris Trauner,  Raul Coimbra, and  Roland R. Lee. 2009. “Integrated Imaging Approach with MEG and DTI to Detect Mild Traumatic Brain Injury in Military and Civilian Patients.” Journal of Neurotrauma 26(8):1213–26.
    
    [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1089/neu.2008.0672&link_type=DOI) 
    
    [PubMed](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=19385722&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fmedrxiv%2Fearly%2F2021%2F03%2F29%2F2021.03.25.21254285.atom) 
    
    [Web of Science](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=000268629900005&link_type=ISI) 

25. Huang, Ming Xiong,  Sharon Nichols,  Dewleen G. Baker,  Ashley Robb,  Annemarie Angeles,  Kate A. Yurgil,  Angela Drake,  Michael Levy,  Tao Song,  Robert McLay,  Rebecca J. Theilmann,  Mithun Diwakar,  Victoria B. Risbrough,  Zhengwei Ji,  Charles W. Huang,  Douglas G. Chang,  Deborah L. Harrington,  Laura Muzzatti,  Jose M. Canive,  J. Christopher Edgar,  Yu Han Chen, and  Roland R. Lee. 2014. “Single-Subject-Based Whole-Brain MEG Slow-Wave Imaging Approach for Detecting Abnormality in Patients with Mild Traumatic Brain Injury.” NeuroImage: Clinical 5:109–19.
    
    

26. Huang, Ming Xiong,  Deborah L. Harrington,  Ashley Robb Swan,  Annemarie Angeles Quinto,  Sharon Nichols,  Angela Drake,  Tao Song,  Mithun Diwakar,  Charles W. Huang,  Victoria B. Risbrough,  Anders Dale,  Hauke Bartsch,  Scott Matthews,  Jeffrey W. Huang,  Roland R. Lee, and  Dewleen G. Baker. 2017. “Resting-State Magnetoencephalography Reveals Different Patterns of Aberrant Functional Connectivity in Combat-Related Mild Traumatic Brain Injury.” Journal of Neurotrauma 34(7):1412–26.
    
    

27. Ilvesmäki, Tero,  Teemu M. Luoto,  Ullamari Hakulinen,  Antti Brander,  Pertti Ryymin,  Hannu Eskola,  Grant L. Iverson, and  Juha Öhman. 2014. “Acute Mild Traumatic Brain Injury Is Not Associated with White Matter Change on Diffusion Tensor Imaging.” Brain 137(7):1876–82.
    
    [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1093/brain/awu095&link_type=DOI) 
    
    [PubMed](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=24818956&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fmedrxiv%2Fearly%2F2021%2F03%2F29%2F2021.03.25.21254285.atom) 

28. Iraji, Armin,  Randall R. Benson,  Robert D. Welch,  Brian J. O’Neil,  John L. Woodard,  Syed Imran Ayaz,  Andrew Kulek,  Valerie Mika,  Patrick Medado,  Hamid Soltanian-Zadeh,  Tianming Liu,  E. Mark Haacke, and  Zhifeng Kou. 2015. “Resting State Functional Con-nectivity in Mild Traumatic Brain Injury at the Acute Stage: Independent Component and Seed-Based Analyses.” Journal of Neu-rotrauma 32(14):1031–45.
    
    [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1089/neu.2014.3610&link_type=DOI) 

29. Julious, S. A. 2005. “Sample size of 12 per group rule of thumb for a pilot study.” Pharmaceutical Statistics: The Journal of Applied Sta-tistics in the Pharmaceutical Industry, 4(4):287–291.
    
    

30. Junn, Cherry,  Kathleen R. Bell,  Christian Shenouda, and  Jeanne M. Hoffman. 2015. “Symptoms of Concussion and Comorbid Disor-ders.” Current Pain and Headache Reports 19(9).
    
    

31. Kaushal, M., España, L. Y., Nencka, A. S., Wang, Y., Nelson, L. D., McCrea, M. A., & Meier, T. B. 2019. “Resting-state functional connectivity after concussion is associated with clinical recovery.” Human brain mapping 40(4): 1211–1220.
    
    

32. Kaut, K. P., DePompei, R., Kerr, J., & Congeni, J. 2003. “Reports of head injury and symptom knowledge among college athletes: impli-cations for assessment and educational intervention.” Clinical Journal of Sport Medicine 13(4):213–221.
    
    [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1097/00042752-200307000-00004&link_type=DOI) 
    
    [PubMed](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=12855923&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fmedrxiv%2Fearly%2F2021%2F03%2F29%2F2021.03.25.21254285.atom) 
    
    [Web of Science](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=000184374400004&link_type=ISI) 

33. Killgore, William D. S.,  Prabhjyot Singh,  Maia Kipman,  Derek Pisner,  Andrew Fridman, and  Mareen Weber. 2016. “Gray Matter Vol-ume and Executive Functioning Correlate with Time since Injury Following Mild Traumatic Brain Injury.” Neuroscience Letters 612:238–44.
    
    

34. Klimova, A., Korgaonkar, M. S., Whitford, T., & Bryant, R. A. 2019. “Diffusion tensor imaging analysis of mild traumatic brain injury and posttraumatic stress disorder.” Biological psychiatry: cognitive neuroscience and neuroimaging 4(1): 81–90.
    
    

35. Koski, Lisa,  Theodore Kolivakis,  Camilla Yu,  Jen Kai Chen,  Scott Delaney, and  Alain Ptito. 2015. “Noninvasive Brain Stimulation for Persistent Postconcussion Symptoms in Mild Traumatic Brain Injury.” Journal of Neurotrauma 32(1):38–44.
    
    [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1089/neu.2014.3449&link_type=DOI) 
    
    [PubMed](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=24955920&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fmedrxiv%2Fearly%2F2021%2F03%2F29%2F2021.03.25.21254285.atom) 

36. Kurča, E.,  Š. Sivák, and  P. Kučera. 2006. “Impaired Cognitive Functions in Mild Traumatic Brain Injury Patients with Normal and Patho-logic Magnetic Resonance Imaging.” Neuroradiology 48(9):661–69.
    
    [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1007/s00234-006-0109-9&link_type=DOI) 
    
    [PubMed](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=16786351&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fmedrxiv%2Fearly%2F2021%2F03%2F29%2F2021.03.25.21254285.atom) 
    
    [Web of Science](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=000240379200009&link_type=ISI) 

37. Lancaster, M. A.,  Daniel V. Olson,  Michael A. McCrea,  Lindsay D. Nelson,  Ashley A. LaRoche, and  L. Tugan Muftuler. 2016. “Acute White Matter Changes Following Sport-Related Concussion: A Serial Diffusion Tensor and Diffusion Kurtosis Tensor Imaging Study.” Human Brain Mapping 37(11):3821–34.
    
    [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1002/hbm.23278&link_type=DOI) 
    
    [PubMed](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=27237455&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fmedrxiv%2Fearly%2F2021%2F03%2F29%2F2021.03.25.21254285.atom) 

38. Lancaster, M. A., Meier, T. B., Olson, D. V., McCrea, M. A., Nelson, L. D., & Muftuler, L. T. 2018. “Chronic differences in white matter integrity following sport-related concussion as measured by diffusion MRI: 6-Month follow-up.” Human brain mapping, 39(11): 4276–4289.
    
    

39. Lange, Rael T.,  Grant L. Iverson,  Jeffrey R. Brubacher, Burkhard Mädler, and  Manraj K. Heran. 2012. “Diffusion Tensor Imaging Find-ings Are Not Strongly Associated with Postconcussional Disorder 2 Months Following Mild Traumatic Brain Injury.” Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation 27(3):188–98.
    
    [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1097/HTR.0b013e318217f0ad&link_type=DOI) 
    
    [PubMed](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=21642855&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fmedrxiv%2Fearly%2F2021%2F03%2F29%2F2021.03.25.21254285.atom) 
    
    [Web of Science](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=000303941500007&link_type=ISI) 

40. Lange, Rael T.,  William J. Panenka,  Jason R. Shewchuk,  Manraj K. S. Heran,  Jeffrey R. Brubacher,  Sylvain Bioux,  Ryan Eckbo,  Martha E. Shenton, and  Grant L. Iverson. 2015. “Diffusion Tensor Imaging Findings and Postconcussion Symptom Reporting Six Weeks Following Mild Traumatic Brain Injury.” Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology 30(1):7–25.
    
    [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1093/arclin/acu060&link_type=DOI) 
    
    [PubMed](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=25416729&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fmedrxiv%2Fearly%2F2021%2F03%2F29%2F2021.03.25.21254285.atom) 

41. Lannsjö, Marianne,  Raili Raininko,  Mariana Bustamante,  Charlotta Von Seth, and  Jörgen Borg. 2013. “Brain Pathology after Mild Trau-matic Brain Injury: An Exploratory Study by Repeated Magnetic Resonance Examination.” Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine 45(8):721–28.
    
    [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.2340/16501977-1169&link_type=DOI) 
    
    [PubMed](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=24002306&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fmedrxiv%2Fearly%2F2021%2F03%2F29%2F2021.03.25.21254285.atom) 

42. Larson, Michael J.,  Peter E. Clayson, and  Thomas J. Farrer. 2012. “Performance Monitoring and Cognitive Control in Individuals with Mild Traumatic Brain Injury.” Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society 18(2):323–33.
    
    [PubMed](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=22272692&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fmedrxiv%2Fearly%2F2021%2F03%2F29%2F2021.03.25.21254285.atom) 

43. Lee, Hana,  Max Wintermark,  Alisa D. Gean,  Jamshid Ghajar,  Geoffrey T. Manley, and  Pratik Mukherjee. 2008. “Focal Lesions in Acute Mild Traumatic Brain Injury and Neurocognitive Outcome: CT versus 3T MRI.” Journal of Neurotrauma 25(9):1049–56.
    
    [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1089/neu.2008.0566&link_type=DOI) 
    
    [PubMed](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=18707244&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fmedrxiv%2Fearly%2F2021%2F03%2F29%2F2021.03.25.21254285.atom) 
    
    [Web of Science](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=000260054900001&link_type=ISI) 

44. Lewine, J. D., Plis, S., Ulloa, A., Williams, C., Spitz, M., Foley, J., … & Weaver, L. 2019. “Quantitative EEG biomarkers for mild trau-matic brain injury.” Journal of Clinical Neurophysiology 36(4): 298–305.
    
    

45. Liu, Guobing,  Prasanna Ghimire,  Haopeng Pang,  Guangyao Wu, and  Hongcheng Shi. 2014. “Improved Sensitivity of 3.0 Tesla Suscepti-bility-Weighted Imaging in Detecting Traumatic Bleeds and Its Use in Predicting Outcomes in Patients with Mild Traumatic Brain Injury.” Acta Radiologica 56(10):1256–63.
    
    

46. Manning, K. Y., Llera, A., Dekaban, G. A., Bartha, R., Barreira, C., Brown, A., … & Fraser, D. D. 2019. “Linked MRI signatures of the brain’s acute and persistent response to concussion in female varsity rugby players.” NeuroImage: Clinical 21: 101627.
    
    

47. McCrea, M., Hammeke, T., Olsen, G., Leo, P., & Guskiewicz, K. 2004. “Unreported concussion in high school football players: implica-tions for prevention.” Clinical journal of sport medicine 14(1):13–17.
    
    [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1097/00042752-200401000-00003&link_type=DOI) 
    
    [PubMed](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=14712161&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fmedrxiv%2Fearly%2F2021%2F03%2F29%2F2021.03.25.21254285.atom) 
    
    [Web of Science](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=000230326800003&link_type=ISI) 

48. Meier, Timothy B.,  Maurizio Bergamino,  Patrick S. F. Bellgowan,  T. K. Teague,  Josef M. Ling,  Andreas Jeromin, and  Andrew R. Mayer. 2016. “Longitudinal Assessment of White Matter Abnormalities Following Sports-Related Concussion.” Human Brain Mapping 37(2):833–45.
    
    [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1002/hbm.23072&link_type=DOI) 
    
    [PubMed](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=26663463&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fmedrxiv%2Fearly%2F2021%2F03%2F29%2F2021.03.25.21254285.atom) 

49. Messé, Arnaud,  Sophie Caplain,  Gaëlle Paradot,  Delphine Garrigue, Jean  François Mineo,  Gustavo Soto Ares,  Denis Ducreux,  Frédéric Vignaud,  Gaëlle Rozec,  Hubert Desal,  Mélanie Pélégrini-Issac,  Michèle Montreuil,  Habib Benali, and  Stéphane Lehéricy. 2011. “Diffusion Tensor Imaging and White Matter Lesions at the Subacute Stage in Mild Traumatic Brain Injury with Persistent Neuro-behavioral Impairment.” Human Brain Mapping 32(6):999–1011.
    
    [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1002/hbm.21092&link_type=DOI) 
    
    [PubMed](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=20669166&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fmedrxiv%2Fearly%2F2021%2F03%2F29%2F2021.03.25.21254285.atom) 
    
    [Web of Science](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=000290445800014&link_type=ISI) 

50. Messé, Arnaud,  Sophie Caplain,  Mélanie Pélégrini-Issac,  Sophie Blancho,  Michèle Montreuil,  Richard Lévy,  Stéphane Lehéricy, and  Habib Benali. 2012. “Structural Integrity and Postconcussion Syndrome in Mild Traumatic Brain Injury Patients.” Brain Imaging and Behavior 6(2):283–92.
    
    

51. Messé, Arnaud,  Sophie Caplain,  Mélanie Pélégrini-Issac,  Sophie Blancho,  Richard Lévy,  Nozar Aghakhani,  Michèle Montreuil,  Habib Benali, and  Stéphane Lehéricy. 2013. “Specific and Evolving Resting-State Network Alterations in Post-Concussion Syndrome Following Mild Traumatic Brain Injury.” PLoS ONE 8(6):1–10.
    
    [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1371/journal.pone.0054583&link_type=DOI) 
    
    [PubMed](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=23620825&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fmedrxiv%2Fearly%2F2021%2F03%2F29%2F2021.03.25.21254285.atom) 

52. Miller, Danielle R.,  Jasmeet P. Hayes,  Ginette Lafleche,  David H. Salat, and  Mieke Verfaellie. 2016. “White Matter Abnormalities Are Associated with Chronic Postconcussion Symptoms in Blast-Related Mild Traumatic Brain Injury.” Human Brain Mapping 37(1):220–29.
    
    

53. Motzkin, Julian C.,  Carissa L. Philippi,  Richard C. Wolf,  Mustafa K. Baskaya, and  Michael Koenigs. 2015. “Ventromedial Prefrontal Cortex Is Critical for the Regulation of Amygdala Activity in Humans.” Biological Psychiatry 77(3):276–84.
    
    [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1016/j.biopsych.2014.02.014&link_type=DOI) 
    
    [PubMed](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=24673881&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fmedrxiv%2Fearly%2F2021%2F03%2F29%2F2021.03.25.21254285.atom) 

54. Murdaugh, D. L., King, T. Z., Sun, B., Jones, R. A., Ono, K. E., Reisner, A., & Burns, T. G. 2018. “Longitudinal Changes in Resting State Connectivity and White Matter Integrity in Adolescents With Sports-Related Concussion–Erratum.” Journal of the Interna-tional Neuropsychological Society 24(8): 890–890.
    
    

55. Mutch, W. Alan C.,  Michael J. Ellis,  M. Ruth Graham,  Vincent Wourms,  Roshan Raban,  Joseph A. Fisher,  David Mikulis,  Jeffrey Leiter, and  Lawrence Ryner. 2014. “Brain MRI CO2 Stress Testing: A Pilot Study in Patients with Concussion.” PLoS ONE 9(7):1–10.
    
    [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1371/journal.pone.0089680&link_type=DOI) 
    
    [PubMed](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=24551193&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fmedrxiv%2Fearly%2F2021%2F03%2F29%2F2021.03.25.21254285.atom) 

56.  Næss-Schmidt, Erhard Trillingsgaard,  Jakob Udby Blicher,  Simon Fristed Eskildsen,  Anna Tietze,  Brian Hansen,  Peter William Stubbs,  Sune Jespersen,  Leif Østergaard, and Jørgen Feldbæk Nielsen. 2017. “Microstructural Changes in the Thalamus after Mild Trau-matic Brain Injury: A Longitudinal Diffusion and Mean Kurtosis Tensor MRI Study.” Brain Injury 31(2):230–36.
    
    [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1080/02699052.2016.1229034&link_type=DOI) 
    
    [PubMed](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=28055267&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fmedrxiv%2Fearly%2F2021%2F03%2F29%2F2021.03.25.21254285.atom) 

57. Ouzzani M., Hammady H., Fedorowicz Z., Elmagarmid A. 2016 “Rayyan-a Web and Mobile App for Systematic Reviews,” Systematic Reviews, 5(1): 210
    
    

58. Owen, Adrian M.,  Kathryn M. McMillan,  Angela R. Laird, and  Ed Bullmore. 2005. “N-Back Working Memory Paradigm: A Meta-Analysis of Normative Functional Neuroimaging Studies.” Human Brain Mapping 25(1):46–59.
    
    [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1002/hbm.20131&link_type=DOI) 
    
    [PubMed](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=15846822&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fmedrxiv%2Fearly%2F2021%2F03%2F29%2F2021.03.25.21254285.atom) 
    
    [Web of Science](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=000228759600005&link_type=ISI) 

59. Palacios, Eva M.,  Esther L. Yuh,  Yi Shin Chang,  John K. Yue,  David M. Schnyer,  David O. Okonkwo,  Alex B. Valadka,  Wayne A. Gor-don,  Andrew I. R. Maas,  Mary Vassar,  Geoffrey T. Manley, and  Pratik Mukherjee. 2017. “Resting-State Functional Connectivity Alterations Associated with Six-Month Outcomes in Mild Traumatic Brain Injury.” Journal of Neurotrauma 34(8):1546–57.
    
    

60. Panenka, William J.,  Rael T. Lange,  Sylvain Bouix,  Jason R. Shewchuk,  Manraj K. S. Heran,  Jeffrey R. Brubacher,  Ryan Eckbo,  Martha E. Shenton, and  Grant L. Iverson. 2015. “Neuropsychological Outcome and Diffusion Tensor Imaging in Complicated versus Un-complicated Mild Traumatic Brain Injury.” PLoS ONE 10(4):1–27.
    
    [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1371/journal.pone.0131080&link_type=DOI) 
    
    [PubMed](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=25919488&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fmedrxiv%2Fearly%2F2021%2F03%2F29%2F2021.03.25.21254285.atom) 

61. Pardini, Jamie E.,  Dustin A. Pardini,  James T. Becker,  Kathryn L. Dunfee,  William F. Eddy,  Mark R. Lovell, and  Joel S. Welling. 2010. “Postconcussive Symptoms Are Associated with Compensatory Cortical Recruitment during a Working Memory Task.” Neurosur-gery 67(4):1020–27.
    
    [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1227/NEU.0b013e3181ee33e2&link_type=DOI) 
    
    [PubMed](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=20881565&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fmedrxiv%2Fearly%2F2021%2F03%2F29%2F2021.03.25.21254285.atom) 

62. Petrie, Eric C.,  Donna J. Cross,  Vasily L. Yarnykh,  Todd Richards,  Nathalie M. Martin,  Kathleen Pagulayan,  David Hoff,  Kim Hart,  Cynthia Mayer,  Matthew Tarabochia,  Murray A. Raskind,  Satoshi Minoshima, and  Elaine R. Peskind. 2014. “Neuroimaging, Be-havioral, and Psychological Sequelae of Repetitive Combined Blast/Impact Mild Traumatic Brain Injury in Iraq and Afghanistan War Veterans.” Journal of Neurotrauma 31(5):425–36.
    
    [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1089/neu.2013.2952&link_type=DOI) 
    
    [PubMed](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=24102309&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fmedrxiv%2Fearly%2F2021%2F03%2F29%2F2021.03.25.21254285.atom) 

63. Rangaprakash, D.,  Gopikrishna Deshpande,  Thomas A. Daniel,  Adam M. Goodman,  Jennifer L. Robinson,  Nouha Salibi,  Jeffrey S. Katz,  Thomas S. Denney, and  Michael N. Dretsch. 2017. “Compromised Hippocampus-Striatum Pathway as a Potential Imaging Bi-omarker of Mild-Traumatic Brain Injury and Posttraumatic Stress Disorder.” Human Brain Mapping 38(6):2843–64.
    
    

64. Reches, A.,  J. Kutcher,  R. J. Elbin,  H. Or-Ly,  B. Sadeh,  J. Greer,  D. J. McAllister,  A. Geva, and  A. P. Kontos. 2017. “Preliminary Inves-tigation of Brain Network Activation (BNA) and Its Clinical Utility in Sport-Related Concussion.” Brain Injury 31(2):237–46.
    
    

65.  Robb Swan Ashley,  Sharon Nichols,  Angela Drake,  Anne Marie Angeles,  Mithun Diwakar,  Tao Song,  Roland R. Lee, and  Ming Xiong Huang. 2015. “Magnetoencephalography Slow-Wave Detection in Patients with Mild Traumatic Brain Injury and Ongoing Symp-toms Correlated with Long-Term Neuropsychological Outcome.” Journal of Neurotrauma 32(19):1510–21.
    
    

66. Ruiter, K. I., Boshra, R., Doughty, M., Noseworthy, M., & Connolly, J. F. 2019. “Disruption of function: Neurophysiological markers of cognitive deficits in retired football players.” Clinical neurophysiology 130(1):111–121.
    
    [PubMed](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=http://www.n&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fmedrxiv%2Fearly%2F2021%2F03%2F29%2F2021.03.25.21254285.atom) 

67. Seeley, William W.,  Vinod Menon,  Alan F. Schatzberg,  Jennifer Keller,  Gary H. Glover,  Heather Kenna,  Allan L. Reiss, and  Michael D. Greicius. 2007. “Dissociable Intrinsic Connectivity Networks for Salience Processing and Executive Control.” Journal of Neuro-science 27(9):2349–56.
    
    [Abstract/FREE Full Text](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/ijlink/YTozOntzOjQ6InBhdGgiO3M6MTQ6Ii9sb29rdXAvaWpsaW5rIjtzOjU6InF1ZXJ5IjthOjQ6e3M6ODoibGlua1R5cGUiO3M6NDoiQUJTVCI7czoxMToiam91cm5hbENvZGUiO3M6Njoiam5ldXJvIjtzOjU6InJlc2lkIjtzOjk6IjI3LzkvMjM0OSI7czo0OiJhdG9tIjtzOjUwOiIvbWVkcnhpdi9lYXJseS8yMDIxLzAzLzI5LzIwMjEuMDMuMjUuMjEyNTQyODUuYXRvbSI7fXM6ODoiZnJhZ21lbnQiO3M6MDoiIjt9) 

68. Shahaf, G.,  A. Reches,  N. Pinchuk,  T. Fisher,  G. Ben Bashat,  A. Kanter,  I. Tauber,  D. Kerem,  I. Laufer,  J. Aharon-Peretz,  H. Pratt, and  A.B. Geva. 2012. “Introducing a Novel Approach of Network Oriented Analysis of ERPs, Demonstrated on Adult Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder.” Clinical Neurophysiology 123(8):1568–80.
    
    [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1016/j.clinph.2011.12.010&link_type=DOI) 
    
    [PubMed](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=22261156&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fmedrxiv%2Fearly%2F2021%2F03%2F29%2F2021.03.25.21254285.atom) 

69. Sigurdardottir, Solrun,  Nada Andelic,  Cecilie Roe,  Tone Jerstad, and  Anne Kristine Schanke. 2009. “Post-Concussion Symptoms after Traumatic Brain Injury at 3 and 12 Months Post-Injury: A Prospective Study.” Brain Injury 23(6):489–97.
    
    [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1080/02699050902926309&link_type=DOI) 
    
    [PubMed](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=19484622&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fmedrxiv%2Fearly%2F2021%2F03%2F29%2F2021.03.25.21254285.atom) 
    
    [Web of Science](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=000266489800002&link_type=ISI) 

70. Smits, Marion,  Diederik W. J. Dippel,  Gavin C. Houston,  Piotr A. Wielopolski,  Peter J. Koudstaal,  M. G. Myriam Hunink, and  Aad Van Der Lugt. 2009. “Postconcussion Syndrome after Minor Head Injury: Brain Activation of Working Memory and Attention.” Hu-man Brain Mapping 30(9):2789–2803.
    
    [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1002/hbm.20709&link_type=DOI) 
    
    [PubMed](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=19117278&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fmedrxiv%2Fearly%2F2021%2F03%2F29%2F2021.03.25.21254285.atom) 

71. Smits, Marion,  Gavin C. Houston,  Diederik W. J. Dippel,  Piotr A. Wielopolski,  Meike W. Vernooij,  Peter J. Koudstaal,  M. G. Myria. Hunink, and  Aad Van Der Lugt. 2011. “Microstructural Brain Injury in Post-Concussion Syndrome after Minor Head Injury.” Neu-roradiology 53(8):553–63.
    
    [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1007/s00234-010-0774-6&link_type=DOI) 
    
    [PubMed](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=20924757&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fmedrxiv%2Fearly%2F2021%2F03%2F29%2F2021.03.25.21254285.atom) 
    
    [Web of Science](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=000292889500001&link_type=ISI) 

72. Sours, Chandler,  Haoxing Chen,  Steven Roys,  Jiachen Zhuo,  Amitabh Varshney, and  Rao P. Gullapalli. 2015. “Investigation of Multiple Frequency Ranges Using Discrete Wavelet Decomposition of Resting-State Functional Connectivity in Mild Traumatic Brain Inju-ry Patients.” Brain Connectivity 5(7):442–50.
    
    

73. Sours, Chandler,  Elijah O. George,  Jiachen Zhuo,  Steven Roys, and  Rao P. Gullapalli. 2015. “Hyper-Connectivity of the Thalamus during Early Stages Following Mild Traumatic Brain Injury.” Brain Imaging and Behavior 9(3):550–63.
    
    

74. Sours, Chandler,  Jiachen Zhuo,  Steven Roys,  Kathirkamanthan Shanmuganathan, and  Rao P. Gullapalli. 2015. “Disruptions in Resting State Functional Connectivity and Cerebral Blood Flow in Mild Traumatic Brain Injury Patients.” PLoS ONE 10(8):1–20.
    
    [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1371/journal.pone.0131080&link_type=DOI) 
    
    [PubMed](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=25919488&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fmedrxiv%2Fearly%2F2021%2F03%2F29%2F2021.03.25.21254285.atom) 

75. Stevens, Michael C.,  David Lovejoy,  Jinsuh Kim,  Howard Oakes,  Inam Kureshi, and  Suzanne T. Witt. 2012. “Multiple Resting State Network Functional Connectivity Abnormalities in Mild Traumatic Brain Injury.” Brain Imaging and Behavior 6(2):293–318.
    
    

76. ang, Lin,  Yulin Ge,  Daniel K. Sodickson,  Laura Miles,  Yongxia Zhou,  Joseph Reaume, and  Robert I. Grossman. 2011. “Thalamic Rest-ing-State Functional Networks: Disruption in Patients with Mild Traumatic Brain Injury.” Radiology 260(3):831–40.
    
    [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1148/radiol.11110014&link_type=DOI) 
    
    [PubMed](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=21775670&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fmedrxiv%2Fearly%2F2021%2F03%2F29%2F2021.03.25.21254285.atom) 

77. erry, Douglas P.,  Carlos C. Faraco,  Devin Smith,  Max J. Diddams,  Antonio N. Puente, and  L. Stephen Miller. 2012. “Lack of Long-Term FMRI Differences after Multiple Sports-Related Concussions.” Brain Injury 26(13–14):1684–96.
    
    [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.3109/02699052.2012.722259&link_type=DOI) 
    
    [PubMed](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=23163249&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fmedrxiv%2Fearly%2F2021%2F03%2F29%2F2021.03.25.21254285.atom) 
    
    [Web of Science](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=000311419700014&link_type=ISI) 

78. Thomas, Alexander W.,  Richard Watts,  Christopher G. Filippi,  Joshua P. Nickerson,  Trevor Andrews,  Gregory Lieberman,  Magdalena R. Naylor,  Margaret J. Eppstein, and  Kalev Freeman. 2017. “Dynamic Changes in Diffusion Measures Improve Sensitivity in Identi-fying Patients with Mild Traumatic Brain Injury.” PLoS ONE 12(6):1–23.
    
    [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1371/journal.pone.0179159&link_type=DOI) 
    
    [PubMed](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=28957441&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fmedrxiv%2Fearly%2F2021%2F03%2F29%2F2021.03.25.21254285.atom) 

79. Vakorin, Vasily A.,  Sam M. Doesburg,  Leodante da Costa,  Rakesh Jetly,  Elizabeth W. Pang, and  Margot J. Taylor. 2016. “Detecting Mild Traumatic Brain Injury Using Resting State Magnetoencephalographic Connectivity.” PLoS Computational Biology 12(12):1–24.
    
    [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1371/journal.pcbi.1004863&link_type=DOI) 

80. Vanhaudenhuyse, Audrey,  Athena Demertzi,  Manuel Schabus,  Quentin Noirhomme,  Serge Bredart,  Melanie Boly,  Christophe Phillips,  Andrea Soddu,  Andre Luxen,  Gustave Moonen, and  Steven Laureys. 2011. “Two Distinct Neuronal Networks Mediate the Aware-ness of Environment and of Self.” Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 23(3):570–78.
    
    [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1162/jocn.2010.21488&link_type=DOI) 
    
    [PubMed](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=20515407&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fmedrxiv%2Fearly%2F2021%2F03%2F29%2F2021.03.25.21254285.atom) 
    
    [Web of Science](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=000285160700006&link_type=ISI) 

81. Wäljas, Minna,  Rael T. Lange,  Ullamari Hakulinen,  Heini Huhtala,  Prasun Dastidar,  Kaisa Hartikainen, Juha Öhman, and  Grant L. Iver-son. 2014. “Biopsychosocial Outcome after Uncomplicated Mild Traumatic Brain Injury.” Journal of Neurotrauma 31(1):108–24.
    
    [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1089/neu.2013.2941&link_type=DOI) 
    
    [PubMed](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=23978227&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fmedrxiv%2Fearly%2F2021%2F03%2F29%2F2021.03.25.21254285.atom) 
    
    [Web of Science](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=000330635500010&link_type=ISI) 

82. Wäljas, Minna,  Grant L. Iverson,  Rael T. Lange,  Ullamari Hakulinen,  Prasun Dastidar,  Heini Huhtala,  Suvi Liimatainen,  KaisaHartikainen, and Juha Öhman. 2015. “A Prospective Biopsychosocial Study of the Persistent Post-Concussion Symptoms Follow-ing Mild Traumatic Brain Injury.” Journal of Neurotrauma 32(8):534–47.
    
    [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1089/neu.2014.3339&link_type=DOI) 
    
    [PubMed](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=25363626&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fmedrxiv%2Fearly%2F2021%2F03%2F29%2F2021.03.25.21254285.atom) 

83. Weiner, Kevin S. and  Kalanit Grill-Spector. 2010. “Sparsely-Distributed Organization of Face and Limb Activations in Human Ventral Temporal Cortex.” Neuroimage 52(4):1559–1573.
    
    [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1016/j.neuroimage.2010.04.262&link_type=DOI) 
    
    [PubMed](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=20457261&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fmedrxiv%2Fearly%2F2021%2F03%2F29%2F2021.03.25.21254285.atom) 
    
    [Web of Science](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=000280695200044&link_type=ISI) 

84. Van der Horn, Harm J.,  Edith J. Liemburg,  Myrthe E. Scheenen,  Myrthe E. de Koning,  Jacoba M. Spikman, and  Joukje van der Naalt. 2016. “Post-Concussive Complaints after Mild Traumatic Brain Injury Associated with Altered Brain Networks during Working Memory Performance.” Brain Imaging and Behavior 10(4):1243–53.
    
    

85. Van Der Naalt, J.,  A. H. Van Zomeren, and  W. J. Sluiter. 1999. “One Year Outcome in Mild to Moderate Head Injury: The Predictive Value of Acute Injury Characteristics Related to Complaints and Return to Work.” Headache Quarterly 10(2):158.
    
    

86. Van Der Werf, Ysbrand D.,  Menno P. Witter,  Harry B. M. Uylings, and  Jelle Jolles. 2000. “Neuropsychology of Infarctions in the Thal-amus: A Review.” Neuropsychologia 38(5):613–27.
    
    [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1016/S0028-3932(99)00104-9&link_type=DOI) 
    
    [PubMed](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10689038&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fmedrxiv%2Fearly%2F2021%2F03%2F29%2F2021.03.25.21254285.atom) 
    
    [Web of Science](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=000085750800009&link_type=ISI) 

87. Voormolen D.C., Haagsma J. A., Polinder S., Maas A.I.R., Steyerberg E.W., Vulekovic P., Sewalt C.A., Gravesteijn B.Y., Covic A., Andelic N., Plass A.M, Von Steinbuechel N. 2019,”Post-Concussion Symptoms in Complicated vs Uncomplicated Mild Traumatic Brain Injury Patients at Three and Six Months Post-Injury: Results from the CENTER-TBI Study,”Journal of Clinical Medicine, 8(11): 1921
    
    

88. Yeh, Ping Hong,  Binquan Wang,  Terrence R. Oakes,  Louis M. French,  Hai Pan,  John Graner,  Wei Liu, and  Gerard Riedy. 2014. “Post-concussional Disorder and PTSD Symptoms of Military-Related Traumatic Brain Injury Associated with Compromised Neurocir-cuitry.” Human Brain Mapping 35(6):2652–73.
    
    [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1002/hbm.22358&link_type=DOI) 
    
    [PubMed](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=24038816&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fmedrxiv%2Fearly%2F2021%2F03%2F29%2F2021.03.25.21254285.atom) 

89. Yeh, Ping Hong,  Cheng Guan Koay,  Binquan Wang,  John Morissette,  Elyssa Sham,  Justin Senseney,  David Joy,  Alex Kubli,  Chen Haur Yeh,  Victora Eskay,  Wei Liu,  Louis M. French,  Terrence R. Oakes,  Gerard Riedy, and  John Ollinger. 2017. “Compromised Neu-rocircuitry in Chronic Blast-Related Mild Traumatic Brain Injury.” Human Brain Mapping 38(1):352–69.
    
    

90. Yin, B., Li, D. D., Huang, H., Gu, C. H., Bai, G. H., Hu, L. X., and Zhang, M. 2019. “Longitudinal changes in diffusion tensor imaging following mild traumatic brain injury and correlation with outcome.” Frontiers in neural circuits, 13: 28.
    
    

91. Yoo, R. E., Choi, S. H., Oh, B. M., Do Shin, S., Lee, E. J., Shin, D. J., and Sohn, C. H. 2019. “Quantitative dynamic contrast-enhanced MR imaging shows widespread blood-brain barrier disruption in mild traumatic brain injury patients with post-concussion syn-drome.” European Radiology 29(3): 1308–1317.
    
    

92. Zhou, Yongxia,  Michael P. Milham,  Yvonne W. Lui,  Laura Miles,  Joseph Reaume,  Daniel K. Sodickson,  Robert I. Grossman, and  Yulin Ge. 2012. “Default-Mode Network Disruption in Mild Traumatic Brain Injury.” Radiology 265(3):882–92.
    
    [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1148/radiol.12120748&link_type=DOI) 
    
    [PubMed](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=23175546&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fmedrxiv%2Fearly%2F2021%2F03%2F29%2F2021.03.25.21254285.atom) 

93. Zhou, Yongxia,  Andrea Kierans,  Damon Kenul,  Yulin Ge,  Joseph Rath,  Joseph Reaume,  Robert I. Grossman, and  Yvonne W. Lui. 2013. “Mild Traumatic Brain Injury: Longitudinal Regional Brain Volume Changes.” Radiology 267(3):880–90.
    
    [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1148/radiol.13122542&link_type=DOI) 
    
    [PubMed](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=23481161&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fmedrxiv%2Fearly%2F2021%2F03%2F29%2F2021.03.25.21254285.atom) 
    
    [Web of Science](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=000319445400025&link_type=ISI) 

94. Zhou, Yongxia. 2017. “Small World Properties Changes in Mild Traumatic Brain Injury.” Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging 46(2):518–27.