Abstract
Objective Transmission models provide complementary evidence to clinical trials about the potential population-level incidence reduction attributable to ART (ART prevention impact). Different modelling assumptions about risk heterogeneity may influence projected ART prevention impacts. We sought to review representations of risk heterogeneity in compartmental HIV transmission models applied to project ART prevention impacts in Sub-Saharan Africa.
Design Scoping review to identify common modelling assumptions and applications.
Methods We systematically reviewed studies published before January 2020 that used non-linear compartmental models of sexual HIV transmission to simulate ART prevention impacts in Sub-Saharan Africa. We summarized data on model structure/assumptions (factors) related to risk and intervention heterogeneity, and explored crude associations of ART prevention impact with modelled factors.
Results Of 1384 search hits, 94 studies were included, which primarily modelled medium/high prevalence epidemics in East/Southern Africa. 64 studies considered sexual activity stratification and 39 modelled at least one key population. 21 studies modelled faster/slower ART cascade transitions (HIV diagnosis, ART initiation, or cessation) by risk group, including 8 with faster and 4 with slower cascade transitions among key populations versus the wider population. Models without activity stratification predicted the largest ART prevention impacts, followed by models with key populations that had faster cascade transitions versus the wider population.
Conclusions Among compartmental transmission models applied to project ART prevention impacts, representations of risk heterogeneity and projected impacts varied considerably, where models with less heterogeneity tended to predict larger impacts. The potential influence of modelling assumptions about risk and intervention heterogeneity should be further explored.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
The study was supported by the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (NSERC CGS-D); Ontario Early Researcher Award No. ER17-13-043; and the Canadian Institutes of Health Research Foundation Grant (FN-13455).
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
N/A
All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.
Yes
Data Availability
The extracted data and analysis code are available online via GitHub at the link below.
