Skip to main content
medRxiv
  • Home
  • About
  • Submit
  • ALERTS / RSS
Advanced Search

Opt-out policies capacity to increase organ donors is limited

View ORCID ProfileAlberto Molina-Pérez, View ORCID ProfileDavid Rodríguez-Arias, View ORCID ProfileJanet Delgado
doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.08.27.21262033
Alberto Molina-Pérez
1Institute for Advanced Social Studies, Spanish National Research Council, Spain
2Department of Philosophy 1, Faculty of Philosophy, University of Granada, Spain
3ESOT-ELPAT Public Issues Working Group
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Alberto Molina-Pérez
  • For correspondence: amolina{at}iesa.csic.es
David Rodríguez-Arias
2Department of Philosophy 1, Faculty of Philosophy, University of Granada, Spain
3ESOT-ELPAT Public Issues Working Group
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for David Rodríguez-Arias
Janet Delgado
2Department of Philosophy 1, Faculty of Philosophy, University of Granada, Spain
3ESOT-ELPAT Public Issues Working Group
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Janet Delgado
  • Abstract
  • Full Text
  • Info/History
  • Metrics
  • Supplementary material
  • Data/Code
  • Preview PDF
Loading

Abstract

Objectives To increase post-mortem organ donation rates, several countries are adopting an opt-out (presumed consent) policy, meaning that individuals are deemed donors unless they expressly refused so. However, studies on the relative impact of opt-in or opt-out on deceased organ donation rates are inconclusive. Although opt-out countries tend to have higher donation rates, there is no conclusive evidence that this is caused by the policy itself. The main objective of this study is to better assess the impact of consent policies when considering the role of the family in decision-making.

Design By systematically combining the three components of the decision-making process —the default rule, the deceased’s preferences, and the family’s preferences,— we identify all situations that affect the retrieval outcome under opt-in and opt-out policies. Then, by gathering empirical data from a wide array of countries, we estimate the relative frequency of these situations.

Main outcome measures We measure the relative impact that opt-in and opt-out policies have per se on post-mortem organ retrieval.

Results Our analysis shows that opt-in and opt-out have strictly identical outcomes in eight out of nine situations. These policies only differ when neither the deceased nor the family have expressed a preference and defaults therefore apply. The actual impact of consent policies is typically circumscribed to a range of 0% to 5% of all opportunities for organ retrieval.

Conclusions This study may warn contemporary organ retrieval policy makers that, by emphasizing the need to introduce presumed consent, they might be overestimating the influence of policy defaults and underestimating the power granted to families in expressing their preferences and making decisions about organ donation. Governments should reassess the opportunity and effectiveness of adopting opt-out policies for organ retrieval.

What is already known on this topic

What is already known on this topic

  • Studies on the relative impact of opt-in and opt-out on deceased organ donation rates are inconclusive.

  • There is a correlation between presumed consent and higher rates of organ retrieval, but no evidence of a causal relationship.

  • Most studies overlook the role of the family in decision-making.

What this study adds

What this study adds

  • When the role of the family is taken into account, opt-in and opt-out policies have identical outcomes in eight out of nine situations.

  • The situation where opt-in and opt-out actually differ from each other typically occurs in less than 5% of post-mortem organ retrieval opportunities.

  • Moving from opt-in to opt-out can only marginally increase the organ supply.

Strengths and limitations of this study

Strengths and limitations of this study

  • The main strength of this study is the combination of analytical and empirical methods.

  • This is the first study to analyse all situations that affect the retrieval outcome under both opt-in and opt-out policies when considering the role of the family in decision making.

  • Data analysed in this study is the best empirical evidence available to date.

  • The main limitation of our study is the heterogeneity of sources, sample sizes and time periods for the data collected, especially for the additional supporting evidence.

  • This study only considers the direct effects of opt-out policies on organ retrieval rates, but not its indirect effects, such as organ preservation measures and psychological effects.

Competing Interest Statement

The authors have declared no competing interest.

Funding Statement

This work was supported by the Spanish government, grant numbers [FJCI-2017-34286] and [MINECO FFI2017-88913-P].

Author Declarations

I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.

Yes

The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:

All datasets used in this study were publicly available prior to the initiation of the study. No IRB or ethics committee approval was required.

All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.

Yes

I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).

Yes

I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.

Yes

Footnotes

  • Data from Denmark in Table 4 (page 10) was wrong: the total number of potential donors considered is 235 (not 257). This error affected the percentages. This error has been corrected in the supplementary file too.

Data Availability

All data referred to in the manuscript were openly available prior to the initiation of the study. Data sources used for this study are cited in the manuscript or in the supplementary file.

Copyright 
The copyright holder for this preprint is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under a CC-BY-NC 4.0 International license.
Back to top
PreviousNext
Posted September 16, 2021.
Download PDF

Supplementary Material

Data/Code
Email

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word about medRxiv.

NOTE: Your email address is requested solely to identify you as the sender of this article.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Opt-out policies capacity to increase organ donors is limited
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from medRxiv
(Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from the medRxiv website.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Share
Opt-out policies capacity to increase organ donors is limited
Alberto Molina-Pérez, David Rodríguez-Arias, Janet Delgado
medRxiv 2021.08.27.21262033; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.08.27.21262033
Twitter logo Facebook logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
Citation Tools
Opt-out policies capacity to increase organ donors is limited
Alberto Molina-Pérez, David Rodríguez-Arias, Janet Delgado
medRxiv 2021.08.27.21262033; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.08.27.21262033

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Subject Area

  • Transplantation
Subject Areas
All Articles
  • Addiction Medicine (349)
  • Allergy and Immunology (668)
  • Allergy and Immunology (668)
  • Anesthesia (181)
  • Cardiovascular Medicine (2648)
  • Dentistry and Oral Medicine (316)
  • Dermatology (223)
  • Emergency Medicine (399)
  • Endocrinology (including Diabetes Mellitus and Metabolic Disease) (942)
  • Epidemiology (12228)
  • Forensic Medicine (10)
  • Gastroenterology (759)
  • Genetic and Genomic Medicine (4103)
  • Geriatric Medicine (387)
  • Health Economics (680)
  • Health Informatics (2657)
  • Health Policy (1005)
  • Health Systems and Quality Improvement (985)
  • Hematology (363)
  • HIV/AIDS (851)
  • Infectious Diseases (except HIV/AIDS) (13695)
  • Intensive Care and Critical Care Medicine (797)
  • Medical Education (399)
  • Medical Ethics (109)
  • Nephrology (436)
  • Neurology (3882)
  • Nursing (209)
  • Nutrition (577)
  • Obstetrics and Gynecology (739)
  • Occupational and Environmental Health (695)
  • Oncology (2030)
  • Ophthalmology (585)
  • Orthopedics (240)
  • Otolaryngology (306)
  • Pain Medicine (250)
  • Palliative Medicine (75)
  • Pathology (473)
  • Pediatrics (1115)
  • Pharmacology and Therapeutics (466)
  • Primary Care Research (452)
  • Psychiatry and Clinical Psychology (3432)
  • Public and Global Health (6527)
  • Radiology and Imaging (1403)
  • Rehabilitation Medicine and Physical Therapy (814)
  • Respiratory Medicine (871)
  • Rheumatology (409)
  • Sexual and Reproductive Health (410)
  • Sports Medicine (342)
  • Surgery (448)
  • Toxicology (53)
  • Transplantation (185)
  • Urology (165)