Skip to main content
medRxiv
  • Home
  • About
  • Submit
  • ALERTS / RSS
Advanced Search

How hostile is prolonged brain death for donor organs in transplantation? A time course analysis using clinical samples

View ORCID ProfileKD Bera, J Tabak, RJ Ploeg
doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2022.02.16.22270687
KD Bera
1Oxford Transplant Centre, Nuffield Department of Surgical Sciences, Oxford, UK
3Oxford University NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford, UK
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for KD Bera
  • For correspondence: mopsia{at}gmail.com
J Tabak
2Institute of Biological and Clinical Science, University of Exeter Medical School, Exeter UK
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
RJ Ploeg
1Oxford Transplant Centre, Nuffield Department of Surgical Sciences, Oxford, UK
3Oxford University NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford, UK
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Abstract
  • Full Text
  • Info/History
  • Metrics
  • Supplementary material
  • Data/Code
  • Preview PDF
Loading

Abstract

Organ donation after brain death (DBD) is an important source of transplanted organs, as chronic undersupply means many patients die whilst awaiting transplant. Improving organ quality and graft survival is key to reducing waiting lists: the interval between brain death (BD) confirmation and organ procurement offers an opportunity to reduce injury or encourage repair, yet data are lacking. Here, we developed a novel method of studying time-course changes in serum proteins in a DBD cohort from a UK biobank. Individual donor trajectories were combined into a mathematical model to allow us to determine changes in pro-inflammatory (TNF-alpha, IL-6, Complement) mediators and markers of central nervous injury (NSE, GFAP) after BD. Surprisingly, we found no evidence of a rise of TNF-alpha, NSE, IL-6 or C5a with prolonged BD, questioning the consensus view of progressively pro-inflammatory environment, and identified complement as a potential target for therapeutic intervention to improve organ quality.

Competing Interest Statement

KDB was supported by the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) with an NIHR Academic Clinical Fellowship. KDB received a pump priming research grant from the Oxford Transplant Foundation to support this project (R56956/AA001) RJP is the PI for the Quality in Organ Donation (QUOD) programme The remaining authors declare they have no competing interests.

Funding Statement

KDB received a pump priming research grant from the Oxford Transplant Foundation to support this project (R56956/AA001)

Author Declarations

I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.

Yes

The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:

The QUOD programme research approval as a Research Tissue Bank (REC ref 13/NW/0017, from North West - Greater Manchester Central Research Ethics Committee,) covers the provision of data and research samples for research into improving the quality of organ quality for transplantation. The approval applies to all research projects conducted in the UK using tissue or data supplied by the tissue bank. The favourable REC decision confirmed that further project-based ethical approval applications (by individual researchers) are not deemed necessary.

I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.

Yes

I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).

Yes

I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.

Yes

Data Availability

All data produced in the present work are contained in the manuscript, clarification or further information is available upon reasonable request to the authors

Copyright 
The copyright holder for this preprint is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under a CC-BY-NC 4.0 International license.
Back to top
PreviousNext
Posted February 19, 2022.
Download PDF

Supplementary Material

Data/Code
Email

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word about medRxiv.

NOTE: Your email address is requested solely to identify you as the sender of this article.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
How hostile is prolonged brain death for donor organs in transplantation? A time course analysis using clinical samples
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from medRxiv
(Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from the medRxiv website.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Share
How hostile is prolonged brain death for donor organs in transplantation? A time course analysis using clinical samples
KD Bera, J Tabak, RJ Ploeg
medRxiv 2022.02.16.22270687; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2022.02.16.22270687
Twitter logo Facebook logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
Citation Tools
How hostile is prolonged brain death for donor organs in transplantation? A time course analysis using clinical samples
KD Bera, J Tabak, RJ Ploeg
medRxiv 2022.02.16.22270687; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2022.02.16.22270687

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Subject Area

  • Transplantation
Subject Areas
All Articles
  • Addiction Medicine (349)
  • Allergy and Immunology (668)
  • Allergy and Immunology (668)
  • Anesthesia (181)
  • Cardiovascular Medicine (2648)
  • Dentistry and Oral Medicine (316)
  • Dermatology (223)
  • Emergency Medicine (399)
  • Endocrinology (including Diabetes Mellitus and Metabolic Disease) (942)
  • Epidemiology (12228)
  • Forensic Medicine (10)
  • Gastroenterology (759)
  • Genetic and Genomic Medicine (4103)
  • Geriatric Medicine (387)
  • Health Economics (680)
  • Health Informatics (2657)
  • Health Policy (1005)
  • Health Systems and Quality Improvement (985)
  • Hematology (363)
  • HIV/AIDS (851)
  • Infectious Diseases (except HIV/AIDS) (13695)
  • Intensive Care and Critical Care Medicine (797)
  • Medical Education (399)
  • Medical Ethics (109)
  • Nephrology (436)
  • Neurology (3882)
  • Nursing (209)
  • Nutrition (577)
  • Obstetrics and Gynecology (739)
  • Occupational and Environmental Health (695)
  • Oncology (2030)
  • Ophthalmology (585)
  • Orthopedics (240)
  • Otolaryngology (306)
  • Pain Medicine (250)
  • Palliative Medicine (75)
  • Pathology (473)
  • Pediatrics (1115)
  • Pharmacology and Therapeutics (466)
  • Primary Care Research (452)
  • Psychiatry and Clinical Psychology (3432)
  • Public and Global Health (6527)
  • Radiology and Imaging (1403)
  • Rehabilitation Medicine and Physical Therapy (814)
  • Respiratory Medicine (871)
  • Rheumatology (409)
  • Sexual and Reproductive Health (410)
  • Sports Medicine (342)
  • Surgery (448)
  • Toxicology (53)
  • Transplantation (185)
  • Urology (165)