The effect of self-management online modules plus nurse-led support on pain and quality of life among young adults with irritable bowel syndrome: A randomized controlled trial

Introduction

Irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) is one of the most prevalent disorders of the gut-brain interaction that affects up to 8-12% of the population worldwide (Ford et al., 2020; Lacy & Patel, 2017; Sperber et al., 2017). IBS occurs in women more than in men and is more commonly diagnosed in people younger than 50 years old (Farmer & Aziz, 2013). The economic impact of IBS is substantial and varies among different countries. The estimated costs range from $2 billion per annum in China, £45.6-200 million per annum in the UK, and between $1,562 and $7,547 per patient annually in the United States (Black & Ford, 2020). IBS is often characterized by recurrent abdominal pain, bloating, and altered bowel habits with diarrhea and/or constipation in the absence of demonstrable organic disease (Alammar & Stein, 2019). IBS symptoms can occur due to combination of different factors, including visceral hypersensitivity, altered bowel motility, neurotransmitters imbalance, infection, and psychosocial factors (Chen et al., 2022; Saha, 2014). IBS symptoms, while not life-threatening, post great burdens on both patients and society, the management of which is a global challenge for healthcare systems (Moayyedi et al., 2017). However, self-management interventions among young adults with IBS that incorporate standardized symptom measurements are limited and demanded (Cong, Perry, et al., 2018).

Recurrent abdominal (visceral) pain has been recognized as a cardinal symptom of IBS (Drossman et al., 2009; Page et al., 2018). Visceral pain is a generic term that describes pain originating from internal organs within the thorax and abdomen (Delvaux, 2002; Moloney et al., 2016). In normal conditions, nociceptors sense painful stimuli and project signals onto spinal nociceptive neurons, which gets relayed to the brain to evoke the perception of pain. The brain generates an efferent signal back to the periphery exerting either an inhibitory or a faciliatory effect on the pain sensation (Chang, 2005). In IBS, repeated or chronic activation of the nociceptors due to various factors such as inflammatory mediators (e.g., chemokines, cytokines, corticotropin-releasing hormone, serotonin histamine, proteases, prostaglandins), brain dysfunction and abnormal interaction of the gut-brain axis leads to both peripheral and central sensitization of the brain-gut axis and results in chronic visceral pain (Enck et al., 2016; Greenwood-Van Meerveld & Johnson, 2017; Widgerow & Kalaria, 2012).

Patients with IBS often relate the onset or aggravation of visceral pain to stress (Barbara et al., 2011). Stress can activate the mucosal mast cells of the gut and stimulate release of mediators such as serotonin and pro-inflammatory cytokines, which are responsible for the altered intestinal sensation and motility (Qin et al., 2014). Some evidence also suggests that psychological disturbances can contribute to IBS pain (Chen et al., 2022; Saha, 2014).

Supporting this, 70-90% of people with IBS report one or more psychiatric comorbidities such as anxiety and depression, which may exacerbate IBS symptoms (Barandouzi et al., 2022; Kopczyńska et al., 2018; Tosic-Golubovic et al., 2010). Moreover, IBS patients comorbid with depression experience low quality of life (QOL) (Kopczyńska et al., 2018). Given the importance of visceral pain in IBS and its extensive consequences, pain relief has been the main focus in IBS management (Chey et al., 2015; Ford et al., 2014).

Various approaches have been introduced for IBS-related pain and symptom management. Non-pharmacological interventions such as diet modifications, physical activity, and psychological therapy build on the therapeutic relationship between the patients and healthcare providers, which is an essential component of treatment recommended for the IBS management (Rawla et al., 2018). Patient-centered complementary and integrative medicine identifies a patient as the key player in pain management (Lee et al., 2014). In alignment, the concept of self- management places the patient as the central decision-maker in using self-regulation knowledge and skills as well as resulting actions for managing their health (Barlow et al., 2002). Self- management (SM) has been defined as “a process by which individuals and families use knowledge and beliefs, self-regulation skills and abilities and social facilitation to achieve health-related outcomes” (Ryan & Sawin, 2009). There are diverse formats of SM interventions that have been used in previous studies (Cong, Perry, et al., 2018). Internet-based interventions have been identified as one of the most efficient tools in SM for IBS (Pedersen, 2015). Studies also support other SM interventions such as self-training booklets, individual and group interventions, cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT), and other psychologic approaches as he fundamental features for building self-regulation knowledge and skills (Jarrett et al., 2016; Niesen et al., 2018; Shahabi et al., 2016). Nurse, as one of the most trusted healthcare provider, can help patients achieve better health outcomes by using self-regulation strategies based in SM theory (Grady & Gough, 2014). Evidence also supports that SM led by nurses helped individuals with IBS to effectively adapt and improve their QOL (Cong, Perry, et al., 2018; Pedersen, 2015).

The present study evaluated whether a nurse-led SM intervention can help individuals with IBS to improve their pain and symptom management as well as their QOL compared to only providing the self-Management Online education and learning Modules (SMOM). The Individual and Family Self-Management Theory (IFSMT) (Ryan & Sawin, 2009) was adopted as a theoretical framework of this study. Pain in young adults with IBS was considered as a component of the self-management context. The targeted interventions, developed from prior research and work with the patient population by us (Cong, Ramesh, et al., 2018), focused on the self-management process including self-efficacy and coping. IBS related symptoms were selected as proximal outcome variables, and pain and IBS related QOL were selected as distal outcome variables. The hypotheses included: 1) Both the self-Management Online education and learning Modules (SMOM) and the Nurse-Led one-to-one consultation plus the SMOM (NL + SMOM) interventions would decrease IBS related pain and symptoms, and improve quality of life (QOL) among young adults with IBS; 2) In comparison to the SMOM alone, the NL + SMOM intervention would have better effect on managing IBS related pain and symptoms, and on enhancing IBS-QOL; 3) The effects of the SMOM and NL + SMOM interventions on improving pain and symptom management and increasing QOL would be modified through increasing coping strategies and self-efficacy for managing chronic disease.

Methods

Results

Recruitment and retention

Figure 1 shows the CONSORT flow diagram of the IBS subjects in this study. Among 112 screened, 96 met the inclusion criteria, 80 were recruited, 41 were randomly assigned in the SMOM group, 39 were in the NL + SMOM group, and 80 finished the baseline (T0) data collection. Thirty-five and 27 participants completed data collection at the T1 follow-up visit in the SMOM and NL + SMOM, respectively. Fifty-six completed the T2 follow-up visit with 30 in the SMOM and 26 in the NL + SMOM. The overall retention rate at the 12-week of this study was 70.00% (66.67% in the NL + SMOM and 73.17% in the SMOM).

• Download figure
• Open in new tab

Figure 1. CONSORT flow chart of the current study.

SMOM, Self-Management Online education and learning Modules; NL, Nurse-Led.

^a Sixteen were ineligible, due to the following reasons: 7 had inflammatory bowel disease/ celiac disease;

2 had chronic pain in another area;

1 had chronic pain in another area and antibiotic use;

1 had chronic pain in another area and other medical conditions (GERD); 2 older than 29 years old;

1 older than 29 years old and other medical conditions (diabetes, bipolar); 1 did not have IBS diagnosis from provider;

1 had other medical conditions (anxiety, asthma, heart problems).

For the HC group recruitment and follow up, 27 were screened and 21 who met the inclusion criteria were recruited. All 21 recruited participants completed the baseline session. After the baseline assessment, four participants dropped out for the 12-week follow up session and 17 (80.95%) participants completed the final session.

Participant characteristics

The demographic characteristics are summarized in Table 1. Most IBS subjects were non-Hispanic/Latino White, female, and students who received college or associate degree education. The mean age of IBS subjects and HCs was 21 and 20.14 years old, respectively. There was no significant difference between the two IBS groups in demographic characteristics.

View this table:

• View inline
• View popup
• Download powerpoint

Table 1. Demographic characteristics.

There were less non-Hispanic White participants in the HC group compared with the IBS groups (p = 0.018).

The longitudinal trends of pain and symptom measurements in the three groups are displayed in Figure 2 and Supplementary Table 1. Compared with the HC group, the IBS participants reported significantly higher BPI average pain intensity and pain interference at both baseline and 12-week visits and intensive anxiety, fatigue, and sleep disturbance at baseline. At the 12-week visit, significant decreasing trend was observed in the average pain intensity and pain interference in both the SMOM and NL + SMOM groups, while a decreasing trend of anxiety was apparent only in the NL + SMOM group.

• Download figure
• Open in new tab

Figure 2. Comparison of pain and symptoms among the three groups.

NL, Nurse-Led; SMOM, Self-Management Online education and learning Modules; HC, healthy control.

(A) Comparison of BPI average pain intensity between NL + SMOM, SMOM and HC at baseline, 6-week, and 12-week visits, respectively;

(B) Comparison of BPI pain interference between NL + SMOM, SMOM and HC at baseline, 6-week, and 12-week visits, respectively.

(C) Comparison of PROMIS anxiety T-score between NL + SMOM, SMOM and HC at baseline, 6-week, and 12-week visits, respectively;

(D) Comparison of PROMIS depression T-score between NL + SMOM, SMOM and HC at baseline, 6-week, and 12-week visits, respectively;

(E) Comparison of PROMIS fatigue T-score between NL + SMOM, SMOM and HC at baseline, 6-week, and 12-week visits, respectively;

(F) Comparison of PROMIS sleep disturbance T-score between NL + SMOM, SMOM and HC at baseline, 6-week, and 12-week visits, respectively.

The temporal changes of IBS-QOL levels in the two IBS groups are shown in Supplementary Figure 1 and Supplementary Table 1. Significant increasing trends were observed for the NL + SMOM intervention between baseline and the 12-week in the IBS-QOL total score and the subscales of dysphoria, interference with activity, body image, health worry, social reaction, and relationship. In contrast, the IBS-QOL subscale scores among the SMOM group were not significantly different over time.

Self-management and the mechanisms of the interventions

The self-management strategy measurements of the two IBS groups in the three visits are displayed in Supplementary Table 3. The NL + SMOM group demonstrated an increasing trend in self-efficacy measured by the SEMCD and a decreasing coping praying score at 12-week, while the SMOM group reported a decreasing coping catastrophizing score at the 12-week visit.

The longitudinal mediation analysis in Figure 3 shows that the effects of these two interventions on reducing pain and improving IBS-QOL were mediated by different self- management mechanisms. Self-efficacy was a significant mediator of the NL + SMOM intervention effect, while coping catastrophizing was a significant mediator of the SMOM intervention effect. Specifically, self-efficacy mediated 19.21% (indirect effect = -0.225, 95% CI = [-0.447, -0.033]) of the NL + SMOM intervention effect on reducing pain interference, and mediated 19.19% (indirect effect = 2.158, 95% CI = [0.298, 4.424]) of the NL + SMOM intervention effect on improving IBS-QOL. In contrast, the decrease in coping catastrophizing mediated 55.85% (indirect effect = -0.377, 95% CI = [-0.707, -0.065]) of the SMOM intervention effect on reducing pain interference and mediated 80.61% (indirect effect = 3.293, 95% CI = [0.514, 6.352]) of the SMOM intervention effect on improving IBS-QOL.

• Download figure
• Open in new tab

Figure 3. Direct and indirect effect of interventions on pain and QOL in young adults with IBS by mediation analysis.

NL, Nurse-Led; SMOM, Self-Management Online education and learning Modules; QOL, quality of life.

(A) Direct and Indirect Effect of NL + SMOM on pain interference;

(B) Direct and Indirect Effect of SMOM on pain interference;

(C) Direct and Indirect Effect of NL + SMOM on QOL;

(D) Direct and Indirect Effect of SMOM on QOL.

Discussion

By applying the IFSMT as a theoretic framework, the current RCT tested the effect of a nurse-led one-to-one consultation plus self-management education among young adults with IBS. All the IBS participants in this study received an intervention, SMOM or NL + SMOM. Both IBS groups reported significant pain relief and IBS-QOL improvement at the 12-week follow up compared with the baseline measurement, partially supporting the primary hypothesis.

Having a diagnosis of IBS at a young age can be overwhelming especially when left to navigate symptom management on their own (Tosic-Golubovic et al., 2010). Lack of self- management knowledge and skills has been a challenge for young adults with IBS (Enck et al., 2016; Hollier et al., 2018). The SMOM developed by our team had been established to be an effective approach of self-management among young adults with IBS. The SMOM group reported significantly decreased pain intensity and interference (Table 2, Fig 2 A and 2 B) after viewing the modules. The results reflect that the 10 online modules including approximately 15 minutes of content each are appropriate for this group of young adults, e.g., delivering via internet, in easy-to-follow format, and the short duration allowing them to hold interest (Pedersen, 2015).

Participants in the NL + SMOM group also reported better management of pain and anxiety, and IBS-QOL improvement at follow up visits compared with the SMOM alone group. Thus, the results supported our second hypothesis that NL + SMOM would have a significantly greater interventional effect on managing pain and enhancing QOL comparing with SMOM only. The nurse-led one-to-one consultation in this RCT not only focused on pain self-management, but also addressed stress management, as well as self-management goal setting. Pain self- management strategies were reflected and reinforced during the nurse-led one-to-one consultations. The consultations guided participants in setting their pain self-management goals, which appeared to be an effective way to help participants activate their newly acquired self- management knowledge and skills. Participants in the NL + SMOM group have a quicker benefit than the SMOM only group since the subjects in NL + SMOM reported improved pain management and QOL at 6-week follow up, while the SMOM group did not at the same time frame. The findings were consistent with a previous study which reported nurse-led self- management enhanced pain and symptom management among patients with IBS through education, coaching and consulting (Niesen et al., 2018). Further studies could compare the cost- effectiveness of nurse-led self-management interventions among IBS subjects and/or evaluate the impact on self-management actions, healthcare visits, and utilization of other support services.

Among the IBS related symptoms, the mean score of anxiety was higher than 55 at the baseline visit of IBS participants (Supplementary Table 1), which indicated that they had a higher level of anxiety than the healthy reference population (Cella et al., 2010). Other symptom measures (depression, fatigue, and sleep disturbance) were similar to the healthy reference population, e.g., lower than or around 55 at all the visits (Supplementary Table 1). Our results showed that the anxiety level in the NL + SMOM intervention group decreased at the 12-week follow up compared with baseline, indicating the effect of nurse-led consultation session on relieving anxiety. The mechanism of anxiety reduction may be related to the increased self- efficacy, decreased pain intensity and pain interference among subjects in the NL + SMOM group (Shahabi et al., 2016; Ten Brink et al., 2021). Our results also suggest that an intervention targeting a worse symptom (e.g., anxiety in IBS individuals) may yield a detectable interventional effect. Other symptoms (e.g., fatigue and sleep disturbance) that were within normal range according to the reference group may have improved due to the intervention but were not detectable. Other reason could be the absence of modules in sleep hygiene and mood management. Further studies could also develop additional modules to address the unmet needs of symptom management among IBS population.

The results from mediation analysis supported the third hypothesis that the NL + SMOM and SMOM interventions improved pain management and IBS-QOL through modifying coping strategies and self-management of chronic disease. Moreover, our results indicate that the NL + SMOM and SMOM alleviated pain and improved QOL through different indirect mechanisms, i.e., by increasing self-efficacy for the NL + SMOM and decreasing catastrophizing for SMOM alone, respectively (Figure 3). This was consistent with the change of self-efficacy and coping- catastrophizing. The SMOM mediated pain and QOL by decreasing inefficient coping strategies (catastrophizing) which indicates that the SMOM is a reliable resource to help young adults effectively cope with their IBS and improve self-management. Previous studies also reported that higher self-efficacy was associated with less pain and higher QOL, higher utilization of catastrophizing was associated with higher pain and lower QOL (Lorig et al., 2001; Shahabi et al., 2016; Ten Brink et al., 2021) .

Although both IBS intervention groups reported decreased pain at the 12-week follow up visit, their average pain intensity and pain interference were still significantly higher than those measured in the HCs. This improvement in pain and symptom management as well as IBS-QOL does not guarantee that the effect will last longer than 3 months. A previous study demonstrated that the effect of a IBS symptom management intervention faded at 6-month follow up (Shahabi et al., 2016). IBS is a chronic condition which requires life-long self-management (Vasant et al., 2021). The present study demonstrates that nurse-led one-to-one consultation benefited young adults with IBS greater than just receiving the information (i.e., SMOM only group). Future studies could evaluate implementation of the intervention in clinical practice settings and assess outcomes beyond 3 months.

This study tested the effect of two interventions on managing pain underpinning the theoretical framework of IFSMT. Results supported the theoretic hypotheses that self- management intervention had direct and indirect effects on decreasing pain and improving IBS- QOL (Ryan & Sawin, 2009; Shahabi et al., 2016). Further studies could test the effect of our education modules as well as interventions underpinning the IFMST among more racially and ethnically diverse groups of young adults with IBS, or patients in middle age or older adults with IBS.

Limitation

Several limitations emerged in the current study. Only participants with access to the internet were recruited in this study. IBS subjects without daily internet access may have more urgent needs for pain management. Most of the subjects enrolled in the current study were non- Hispanic White female, which is not reflective of the entire IBS population. Due to the nature of a pilot study, the multiplicity adjustment was not performed in testing multiple hypotheses to control the family-wise type I error. Further confirmatory studies with longer follow-up period could recruit a more diverse population of IBS and engage communities with limit recourses.

Conclusion

This RCT examined the effect of self-management online modules (SMOM) and a nurse- led one-to-one consultation plus SMOM (NL + SMOM) on pain self-management among young adults with IBS. Both the NL + SMOM and SMOM alone showed significant interventional benefits on pain relief and IBS-QOL improvement at the follow up visits. The NL + SMOM also decreased anxiety among IBS subjects. Further studies could follow up the participants at a longer interval since IBS as a chronic condition that needs life-long self-management. These interventions could also be employed in resource limited settings such as underserved communities to improve population health.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, J.C., X.C., Y.Z., W. X., Z. A. B., B. F., and A. S.; formal analysis, Y.Z., J.C., W. X., Z. A. B., J. L., T.Z., M.H.C., and X.C.; funding acquisition, X. C., and A. S.; methodology, J.C., W. X., Z. A. B., J. L., M.H.C., and X.C.; project administration, ., W. X., and X.C.; writing-original draft, J.C., Y.Z., Z. A. B., T.Z., W. X., J. L., and X.C.; writing- review and editing, All. All authors have reviewed the manuscript and agreed to submit this version.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Funding

This study was supported by the National Institute of Nursing Research of the National Institutes of Health (NIH-NINR) under award number: NIH-NINR P20NR016605 (PI Starkweather; Pilot PI: Cong). Jie Chen received research support from Virginia Stone Fund through American Nurses Foundations Research Grants Award, Eastern Nursing Research Society (ENRS)/Council for the Advancement of Nursing Science Dissertation Award, Sigma Theta Tau International Mu Chapter Research Award, and the University of Connecticut Dissertation Fellowship.