Abstract
Background Hypertension is a significant contributor to mortality in India. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to understand the overall hypertension control rate in India, differences across sex and regions, and changes over time.
Methods Community-based, non-interventional studies published between 2001 and 2020 were searched in PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science. Modified New CastleOttawa scales was used to assess the risk of bias. We conducted a random-effects meta-analysis to provide summary estimates by including 29 studies that had a minimum sample size of 100 each. We also conducted subgroup analysis and metaregression to explore changes in control rates over years and to explain the heterogeneity.
Results The systematic review included 170,631 hypertensive patients. The overall control rate was 33.2% (95% CI-27.9,38.6) with substantial heterogeneity, I2=99.1 % (95% CI-98.9,99.2; p <0.001). Subgroup analysis showed that hypertension control rates did not improve over the years (35.8% in 2011-2020 versus 29.6% in 2001-2010, p=0.23) and did not vary between males and females (34.2% for females and 28.2% for males, p=0.23). Control rates were significantly higher in the south region compared to other regions. Meta-regression model with sex, region, study period, and an interaction term for region and period of the study explained 76.5% of heterogeneity. Very few studies analyzed relevant factors that are associated with adequate control.
Conclusion Hypertension is adequately controlled only among one-third of patients in India. India needs more studies at community levels to understand the health system and socioeconomic factors that determine uncontrolled hypertension in India.
PROSPERO registration CRD42021267973
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
This study did not receive any funding
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.
Yes
Data Availability
All the data used in the analysis came from the articles we reviewed, and the articles are included in the reference.
