Abstract
Background The triple network model of psychopathology posits that altered connectivity between the Salience (SN), Central Executive (CEN), and Default Mode Networks (DMN) may underlie neurodevelopmental conditions. However, this has yet to be tested in a transdiagnostic sample of youth.
Methods We investigated triple network connectivity in a sample of 175 children (60 girls) that represent a heterogeneous population who are experiencing neurodevelopmental difficulties in cognition and behavior, and 60 comparison children (33 girls) without such difficulties. Hyperactivity/impulsivity and inattention were assessed by parent-report and resting-state functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging data were acquired. Functional connectivity was calculated between independent network components and regions of interest. We then examined whether connectivity between the SN, CEN and DMN was dimensionally related to hyperactivity/impulsivity and inattention, whilst controlling for age, gender, and motion.
Results Hyperactivity/impulsivity was associated with decreased segregation between the SN, CEN, and DMN in at-risk children, whereas it was associated with increased segregation of the CEN and DMN in comparison children. We replicated these effects in networks and regions derived from an adult parcellation of brain function and when using increasingly stringent exclusion criteria for in-scanner motion.
Conclusions Triple network connectivity characterizes transdiagnostic neurodevelopmental difficulties with hyperactivity/impulsivity. This may arise from delayed network segregation, difficulties sustaining CEN activity to regulate behavior, and/or a heightened developmental mismatch between neural systems implicated in cognitive control relative to those implicated in reward/affect processing.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
The authors were supported by the Medical Research Council program grant MC-A0606-5PQ41.
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
Research Ethics Committee of the National Health Service gave ethical approval for this work. The Centre for Attention Learning and Memory Management Committee of the MRC Cognition and Brain Science Unit gave ethical approval for this work
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.
Yes
Data Availability
The ethics approval for the cohort data used does not currently permit open data access. However, the analysis code is available at: https://osf.io/7mptz/ (DOI: 10.17605/OSF.IO/7MPTZ).
