Abstract
Animal and plant protein sources have contrasting relationships with nutrient adequacy and long-term health, and their adequate ratio is highly debated, especially as they are also differentially associated with environmental pressures. Using reference values for nutrients and disease burden risks for foods, we modeled diets with graded plant protein proportions (%PP) that simultaneously ensure nutrient adequacy, minimize long-term health risks and preserve at best dietary habits in French adults. This multi-criteria diet optimization was conducted in a hierarchical manner, giving priority to long-term health over diet proximity, under the constraints of ensuring nutrient adequacy and food cultural acceptability. We explored the tensions between objectives and identified the most critical nutrients and influential constraints by sensitivity analysis. Finally, environmental pressures related to the modeled diets were estimated using the AGRIBALYSE database. We find that nutrient-adequate diets must fall within the ~15%-80% %PP range, a slightly wider range being nevertheless identifiable by waiving the food acceptability constraints. Fully healthy diets, also achieving the minimum-risk exposure levels for both unhealthy and healthy foods, must fall within the 25%-70% %PP range. All of these healthy diets were very distant from current typical diet. Those with higher %PP had lower environmental impacts, notably on climate change and land use, while being as far from current diet. There is thus no single optimal %PP value when considering only nutrition and health, but high %PP diets are more sustainable. For %PP>80%, nutrient fortification/supplementation and/or new foods are required.
Significance Statement Increasing the plant protein proportion in the diet (%PP) has the potential to improve both human and planetary health, but could be hardly acceptable and a source of nutritional adequacy issues. Here we studied the adequate %PP range and its possible optimal value from a unified nutrition and health perspective, and explored the effect of increasing %PP, within its identified adequate range, on diet departure cost and environmental footprint gain. On the example of French adult diets (%PP=33%), we showed that current western diets need to be profoundly changed to be healthy, regardless of %PP, and that fully nutrient-adequate and healthy diets can be up to %PP=70%, with no extra diet departure but a markedly lower environmental footprint.
Competing Interest Statement
HF has received a research grant by INRAE from Roquette. FM has received research grants as PhD fellowships under his direction by AgroParisTech and INRAE from Terres Univia and Ecotone foundation, under the aegis of Fondation de France.
Funding Statement
This study did not receive any funding.
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
Source data for human data (dietary survey and related files) were openly available before the initiation of the study. They are located at https://www.data.gouv.fr/fr/datasets/donnees-de-consommations-et-habitudes-alimentaires-de-letude-inca-3/#resources.
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.
Yes
Footnotes
Sources of support: The authors report that no funding was received for this study.
Competing Interest Statement: HF has received a research grant by INRAE from Roquette. FM has received research grants as PhD fellowships under his direction by AgroParisTech and INRAE from Terres Univia and Ecotone foundation, under the aegis of Fondation de France.
Availability Statement: Data described in the manuscript, code book, and analytic code will be made available upon request pending application and approval.
We used an updated version of the French agricultural life cycle inventory database (AGRIBALYSE, v3.1 vs v3.0 in the previous manuscript) to reevaluate the environmental pressure of the modeled diets, leading to updates to the results section and Figure 3, and to the results presented in the supplementary materials.
Data Availability
Data described in the manuscript will be made available upon request pending application and approval.
https://www.data.gouv.fr/fr/datasets/agribalyse-r-synthese-1/#resources
Abbreviations used
- ANSES
- French Agency for Food, Environmental and Occupational Health and Safety
- CIQUAL
- French Information Centre on Food Quality
- DALYs
- Disability-adjusted life-years
- DD
- Diet departure criterion
- GBD
- Global Burden of Diseases
- GHGe
- greenhouse gas emissions
- HR
- Health risk criterion
- INCA3
- Third Individual and National Study on Food Consumption French Survey
- %PP
- Percentage of plant protein in the diet
- TMREL
- Theoretical minimum risk exposure level
