ABSTRACT
Falling in the older population occurs frequently. Prospective and cohort studies have investigated the cause of such falls and have attempted to predict fall risk in the older population based on their performance during gait in daily life or during gait and simple tasks in the lab. However, most falls do not occur during steady gait but occur due to challenging centre of mass displacements or environmental hazards resulting in slipping, tripping or falls on stairs. The objective of this systematic review is to identify motion analysis parameters measured during challenging locomotion tasks which can predict fall risk in the older population. A systematic review was conducted in the databases of Pubmed, Scopus and IEEEexplore. Articles studying motion analysis parameters of healthy older and young adults during stair climbing, perturbed walking, and obstacle crossing were included. Study characteristics were extracted, and level of evidence assessed. In total 36 articles were included: 13 on stair climbing, 8 on perturbed walking and 15 on obstacle crossing. No prospective and 5 retrospective studies were included. Risk of bias was low in 7 articles, moderate in 24 articles and serious in 5 articles. Outcome measures included spatiotemporal, dynamic stability, force plate, joint kinematic and kinetic, as well as success rate and step accuracy outcomes. Significant differences between low and high fall risks groups were reported for: foot (toe) clearance during stair ascent; foot contact during stair descent; stair climbing velocity: double stance phase and lower extremity joint force moments in stair climbing, obstacle crossing; and step width variability in all three tasks. Several other motion analysis parameters were significantly difference between young and older adults. There was a large variety in parameter assessment methods, so a meta-analysis was not possible. Future studies on challenging locomotion tasks should focus on long-term follow-up fall risk assessment including an initial assessment of mental and physical characteristics of the older participants. In addition, a consensus on candidate prognostic fall risk parameters and their corresponding assessment method is needed. First recommendations were made based on the findings in this review.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
This study did not receive any funding.
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
The study is a systematic review reporting results from only previously published scientific papers.
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.
Yes
Data Availability
The study is a systematic review reporting results from only previously published scientific papers.
