Abstract
Background Exertional heatstroke (EHS) is the most serious condition in the spectrum of heat illnesses that can occur during sport competition or physical effort under environmental stress. Despite substantial progress in understanding the pathophysiology of EHS, evidence appears to be insufficient for confining its description to a purely physiological syndrome.
Methods We introduce a psycho-cognitive model for EHS, and we initiate its experimental validation using self-report measures in a case-control study. Our working hypothesis is that EHS might be the consequence of the alteration of cost-benefit trade-off associated with prolonged physical activity. Specifically, we propose that EHS might result from the overvaluation of benefits associated with physical effort, as a consequence of overmotivation to succeed, and/or the undervalued costs of effort exertion that result from low interoceptive body awareness, i.e. disrupted processing of signals about the internal (physiological) state of the body.
Results Our psychometric data showed that subjects with a history of EHS (cases, N=51) self-report lower interoceptive body awareness compared to healthy subjects (controls, n=43), but do not differ in terms of motivational trait (global motivation). In addition, we found that cases show a less developed trait mindfulness compared to controls.
Conclusion We provide theoretical foundations and preliminary support for a psycho-cognitive model of EHS. Our findings suggest that relatively simple measures (self-report questionnaires) may have utility in identifying intrinsic (individual-specific) risk factors for EHS. Psycho-cognitive approach of the EHS could potentially lead to novel prevention strategies to mitigate its risk in sport competitions.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
This study is part of a project supported by the French Military Health Service.
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
The study has been approved by the regional ethics committee of the Agence Régionale de Santé Occitanie (Comité de Protection des Personnes Sud-Ouest et Outre-Mer II, ID-RCB: 2020-A01967-32) on September 29, 2020. The study was conducted in accordance with ethical standards of the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments.
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.
Yes
Footnotes
The colors of the figures have been modified, and the list of references has been updated.
Data Availability
The data and materials are currently private for peer review.
