Abstract
Purpose There is limited data available regarding the clinical utility of routine molecular diagnosis of β Thalassaemia in addition to HPLC-based screening in low resource settings. The current study highlights the caveats of an HPLC-based screening compared to the inclusion of genetic confirmation as a second-tier test and its implications in terms of genotype-phenotype correlation.
Material and Methods A prospective, institution-based, observational study was conducted at the Department of Paediatric Medicine, including 103 children aged up to 12 years. Five common mutations for β Thalassemia and the HbE mutation in the HBB gene were tested by a two-tiered approach using multiplex ARMS PCR and PCR RFLP methods respectively. Sanger sequencing of all three exons of the HBB gene was performed in all negative cases.
Results Sequencing revealed many rare pathogenic mutations like c.316-106C>G (dbSNP: 34690599); Hb Kairouan (c.92G>C); c.33C>A (dbSNP rs35799536); c.47G>A (dbSNP rs63750783); c.51delC (HbVar ID 799); c.[93-2A>C] and c.118C>T (HbVar ID 845). We detected a novel Pathogenic M_000518.5(HBB):c.164_168delinsGGCATCA (p.Val55fs) mutation in a heterozygous state which was reported in the ClinVar database with accession ID VCV000590977.2. We also encountered several cases of silent carrier on HPLC and de novo occurrence of mutation.
Conclusion We conclude that the multiplex touchdown ARMS PCR methodology employed in the present study provides a low-cost solution for molecular diagnostics of Β Thalassaemia. The problem of silent carriers in HPLC is significant enough to rethink if we need supplemental genetic testing in the couple when one of the partners is a carrier.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
This study did not receive any funding
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
The ethics committee/IRB of the Institute of Postgraduate Medical Education and Research & SSKM Hospital, Kolkata, India gave ethical approval for this work
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.
Yes
Data Availability
All data produced in the present work are contained in the manuscript
