eSexualHealth: Preferences to Use Technology to Promote Sexual Health Among Men Who Have Sex with Men and Trans and Gender Diverse People

Introduction

While HIV notification rates have decreased in Australia in recent years, gay and bisexual men who have sex with men (GBMSM) continue to be disproportionally affected compared to their heterosexual counterparts.¹ Furthermore, STI incidence rates are higher among GBMSM living with HIV than among HIV-negative GBMSM.² A 2018 survey of trans and gender diverse (TGD) people found that more than half believed they received poor sexual health education during their school years. Additionally, 51.2% reported receiving insensitive sexual health care. Most participants (65%) also reported inconsistent condom use with casual sexual partners. Combined with their poor experiences in sexual health care, it increases their risk for HIV/STIs.³ As a result, greater effort needs to be put into educating and facilitating HIV/STI testing among GBMSM and TGD people.

GBMSM and TGD people can face several barriers when accessing healthcare, such as: experiencing stigma due to their sexuality, a lack of knowledge and culturally appropriate training amongst healthcare providers; and personal concerns around disclosing their sexual identity.^4-6 Specialised sexual healthcare is scarce in Australia, and patients can face long waiting times or high costs. Digital health interventions, also known as eHealth, can improve healthcare access among LGBTIQA+ people.⁷ These can be delivered through mobile devices, laptops, websites, or smartphone apps, and can provide private, personalised content that is easily accessible.⁸ However, to be successful, input from the target audience is essential in creating an intervention that addresses their needs and, in turn, results in increased uptake.^9,10 Previous studies have determined that there is a promising future for an eHealth app among GBMSM.¹¹ However, few studies have investigated the preferences and types of features for different platforms.

This study sought to understand the features of a website or smartphone app that GBMSM and TGD people prefer to access information related to sexual health. We also aimed to measure whether GBMSM and TGD people currently use eHealth for reminding themselves to test for HIV/STIs.

Method

Results

The survey was accessed 727 times during the study period, and 704 people consented to participate of whom 513 (72.9%) completed the survey. There were 47 (9.2%) participants who did not identify as GBMSM or TGD and were excluded, leaving a total of 466 participants for the analysis. Most were recruited through an SMS or email from MSHC (306/466, 65.7%), followed by Grindr (93/466, 20.0%), then community groups (41/466, 8.8%).

Table 1 summarises the sociodemographic characteristics of the study population. Of the 466 participants, the majority identified as cisgender males (92.7%). The median age was 48 (interquartile range [IQR]: 37-56) and three-quarters were born in Australia. There were 21.2% (n=98) of participants living with HIV and had an undetectable viral load. Among those not living with HIV, 37.8% (n=139) reported PrEP use.

Website vs App

Overall, there was no clear preference for an app or website-based sexual health platform. Of the 462 participants that answered the question, 160 (34.6%) would use either a website or an app, 165 (32.7%) would prefer a website, 119 (25.8%) would prefer an app, and 33 (7.1%) would not use either platform. There was no significant difference between GBMSM and TGD people (Supplementary Table 1). Figures 1 and 2 provide the preferences for functions on an app and web-based platform, respectively. Supplementary Figures 1-4 separates out preferences of GBMSM and TGD, and found that GBMSM were more likely to prioritise information about pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) and post-exposure prophylaxis (PEP) (Supplementary Figures 1-4).

• Download figure
• Open in new tab

Figure 1:

Preferences forl functions on an app-based platform among GBMSM and TGD

• Download figure
• Open in new tab

Figure 2:

Preferences for functions on a web-based platform among GBMSM and TGD

In the free-text response, there was a strong emphasis on the need for information, particularly about STI clinics, HIV/STI hotspots (geographical areas with high levels of STI diagnoses), and sexual health education. Concerning STI clinics, respondents wanted information on their location, opening hours, contact details, and the cost of the services. Other themes that emerged included the need for anonymity, accessibility, and a simple user interface. A few participants also highlighted that they would want a discreet app. Participants were interested in features such as a sexual activity tracker (i.e., an online diary that recorded sexual encounters), a daily PrEP reminder system, and an HIV/STI testing reminder system. Some participants suggested introducing an online booking system for clinics, which would allow them to book an appointment in advance.

HIV/STI Testing Reminder

A large proportion of respondents would prefer regular SMS reminders (112/293, 38.2%), followed by regular email reminders (55/293 18.8%) and a reminder function on their phone (48/293, 16.4%). (Figure 3) Testing reminder preferences were similar between GBMSM and TGD people (Supplementary Figures 5-6).

• Download figure
• Open in new tab

Figure 3:

Preferred HIV/STI testing reminder system on an eHealth platform, stratified by rank

Discussion

This study provided insights into how GBMSM and TGD people viewed the use of eHealth for sexual health. Specifically, we identified what features may be desirable for a new eHealth intervention, providing useful information for future implementation research to optimize the use of eHealth among GBMSM and TGD. Participants highlighted their desire for privacy and sexual health information. Furthermore, we found that GBMSM were more likely to prioritise wanting information about PrEP and PEP in comparison to TGD people.

The use of eHealth is a relatively new concept, and international data suggests that this has been accepted elsewhere. A study among 495 GBMSM from the USA found that 91% would be interested in an app with sexual health features tailored to GBMSM.¹¹ A 2015 study using qualitative interviews of 35 MSM in China found that they supported the use of mobile phones and websites for sexual health.¹² Most participants agreed that this provided a level of convenience, and provided information about testing services. Similarly, Nguyen et al. conducted five focus group discussions among MSM in Vietnam. The majority of participants were agreeable to eHealth. They also requested similar content to our participants, such as information about HIV/STIs and testing, and safe sex practice.¹³ The dissemination of sexual health information through social media and dating apps was acceptable to GBMSM in England, however, some participants felt that receiving this information on dating apps could negatively impact user experience.¹⁴ These participants felt that it may dampen the mood when searching for sexual partners, and create negative connotations with new partners.

Ensuring privacy when accessing the services was a prominent theme. It is unclear whether these concerns were due to the stigma surrounding sexual health or whether they resulted from a previous negative experience. Muessig et al. also reported concerns about privacy and confidentiality when accessing eHealth for sexual health.¹² Another study found that the use of eHealth would depend on the privacy policy for most participants in the study.¹⁵ As a result, they may feel that they need to attend a specialist clinic to meet their healthcare needs. However, this can be difficult to access, and these barriers can discourage GBMSM and TGD people from seeking traditional sexual health services such as face-to-face consultations with health care professionals. eHealth addresses these barriers by offering privacy and easy access to sexual health services. These eHealth interventions can be delivered through computers, websites, and personal devices and can deliver content tailored to an individual’s needs. In turn, these address barriers to health care access like cost and accessibility.¹⁶ This was a major concern for respondents, and our findings suggest that future eHealth interventions should prioritise anonymity to ensure uptake and continued use of the services.

SMS for HIV/STI testing reminders was the most popular choice among respondents in our survey. Several studies have already evaluated the use of an SMS reminder system on HIV/STI testing. A minority of participants from our study indicated that they would prefer an email reminder, however, this has not been evaluated previously. A 2013 study conducted by Zou et al. at MSHC found that GBMSM who received quarterly STI testing reminders by text or email were more likely to return for a test (median 3 vs 1 test in 12 months) than controls.¹⁷ However, this study did not stratify results by the modality used. A 2011 study looking at STI testing rates among Australian GBMSM found that those who received 3 to 6-monthly SMS reminders were 4.4 times more likely to retest for HIV/STIs than those who did not receive a text.¹⁸ Similarly, a 2019 USA study reported that men who received a quarterly SMS testing reminder had a shorter interval between HIV tests than men who did not receive a text.¹⁹ SMS reminders are a feasible intervention that is relatively affordable and can help increase STI testing rates and has a lower burden on the health system than phone calls or other in-person interventions. Second, mobile technology is almost universally used and can effectively reach a wider population. A 2020 meta-analysis found that there were high levels of feasibility for mHealth tailored to GBMSM. However, most studies reviewed were pilot trials, and it is unclear whether these mHealth interventions would be successful on a larger scale.²⁰

Our study has several limitations. First, this is a cross-sectional study, and thus we cannot make causal inferences. Secondly, our study only recruited through one gay dating app (Grindr) but no other mainstream apps, such as Tinder, Bumble, and Hinge. This may have skewed the results, and as a result, we only included GBMSM and TGD people in the analysis; thus, our findings are not generalisable to other members of the LGBTIQA+ population. To make any future intervention successful, it will require further collaboration between developers and a more representative sample of the population. Third, our sample was mostly derived from men who had recently attended a sexual health service. These individuals would therefore be biased towards individuals who are comfortable attending services and so our estimates are likely to underestimate preferences for eHealth services. Future studies should seek the views of individuals who are at risk but not attending services although we appreciate undertaking such a study is difficult. Finally, HIV/STI-related stigma, potentially influencing perceived engagement with digital platforms and data security, was not measured.

Conclusion

Overall, our study suggests a promising future for eHealth among GBMSM and TGD people. Sexual health is still a stigmatised area, and eHealth may circumvent barriers this population faces. Further research that provides in-depth data on the themes raised in this study is required to ensure the acceptability and feasibility of any future interventions. Specifically, confidentiality and options to remain anonymous should be considered in future developments of eHealth for sexual health.

Supplemental Data

• Download figure
• Open in new tab

Supplementary Figure 1:

Preferences for functions on a web-based platform among GBMSM

• Download figure
• Open in new tab

Supplementary Figure 2:

Preferences for functions on a web-based platform among TGD people

• Download figure
• Open in new tab

Supplementary Figure 3:

Preferences for functions on an app-based platform among GBMSM

• Download figure
• Open in new tab

Supplementary Figure 4:

Preferences for functions on an app-based platform among TGD people

• Download figure
• Open in new tab

Supplementary Figure 5:

Preferred HIV/STI testing reminder system on an eHealth platform among GBMSM

• Download figure
• Open in new tab

Supplementary Figure 6:

Preferred HIV/STI testing reminder system on an eHealth platform, among TGD people