The Association of Alpha Globin Gene Copy Number with Exhaled Nitric Oxide in a Cross-sectional Study of Healthy Black Adults

INTRODUCTION

Nitric oxide (NO) has numerous biological activities in the lung, serving as a bronchodilator, vasodilator, neurotransmitter, and inflammatory mediator. In asthmatic individuals, the fractional exhalation of nitric oxide (FeNO) is a validated measure of airway inflammation;(1,2) however, little is known about genetic factors influencing FeNO, particularly among healthy Black individuals.

Recently, a new paradigm of NO regulation in the vasculature has emerged in which endothelial alpha globin interacts with endothelial NO synthase (eNOS) to limit the release of NO within small arteries.(3) Genetic deletion of alpha globin, common among Black Americans, is associated with improved NO-mediated vascular perfusion and with protection from kidney disease.(4–6) Alpha globin, beta globin, and eNOS are expressed in airway epithelium and while beta globin has been found to interact directly with eNOS to regulate the oxidation of NO, the role of alpha globin in healthy respiratory epithelium remains undefined.(7–10) NO is produced by inducible NOS (iNOS) in airway epithelial and inflammatory cells(11). While the interaction of alpha globin with iNOS has not previously been studied in epithelial cells, the structure of iNOS is nearly identical to that of eNOS, including at the sites where eNOS interacts with alpha globin.(12) This raised the question of whether alpha globin regulates NO release from the respiratory epithelium. To address this question, we analyzed the association between FeNO and HBA copy number in healthy Black adults.

METHODS

Healthy black individuals aged 18-40 years were enrolled in a multi-center, cross-sectional cohort at four university sites near Durham, North Carolina from 2005 to 2008.(13) All participants provided oral and written informed consent. The protocol was approved by the Duke University Institutional Review Board (#Pro00004947). Age, sex, race, and ethnicity were self-reported. Only non-Hispanic African American participants were enrolled. Participants were asked to confirm they were healthy (i.e., no chronic illnesses or chronic use of any medication except oral contraceptives); had no history of asthma, allergic rhinitis, hay fever, or atopic dermatitis; and were nonsmokers. Blood samples were obtained. HBA copy number was measured by droplet digital PCR (ddPCR) on genomic DNA. Total serum immunoglobulin-E (IgE) was measured using the Pharmacia CAP system. FeNO was measured in triplicate with a Sievers 280i Nitric Oxide Analyzer (GE Analytical Instruments, Boulder, Colo) according to American Thoracic Society recommendations.(1) A 50 mL/s flow rate was established against resistance to maintain 5 cmH₂O oropharyngeal pressure.(13) Additional exclusion criteria for this analysis were: not consenting to future research and serum cotinine level >25 ng/mL signifying active tobacco use.

RESULTS

Of 895 original study participants, 720 consented for future research and had DNA available for genotyping. Sixty-four participants were excluded due to high cotinine levels and 13 were excluded due to indeterminate HBA genotype. The remaining 643 participants were 35% male and had a median (25^th,75^th) age of 20 (19, 22) years, serum IgE level of 58.3 (22, 160) kU/L, and FeNO value of 20 (13, 31) ppb (Table 1).

HBA deletion was common with 30 (4.7%) -a/-a, 197 (30.6%) -a/aa, 405 (63%) aa/aa, and 8 (1.2%) aa/aaa genotypes. Median (25^th, 75^th) FeNO was 25 (18, 39) ppm in the -a/-a group, 20 (12, 27) ppm in the -a/aa group, 20 (13, 32) ppm in the aa/aa group, and 37 (9, 52) ppm in the aa/aaa group (Table 1 and Figure 1). In an unadjusted linear regression analysis using the pre-specified additive genetic model, the coefficient for HBA copy number with FeNO was 0.001 (95% CI: −0.039, 0.040; p=0.978). After adjustment for sex, age, and serum IgE, the coefficient for HBA copy number with FeNO was −0.005 (95% CI: −0.042, 0.033; p=0.811; Table 2). In post hoc sensitivity analyses, the adjusted association between the homozygous genotype -a/-a and FeNO was 0.099 (95% CI −0.007, 0.206; p = 0.066) when analyzed as a categorical variable and 0.107 (95% CI 0.003, 0.212; p = 0.045; Table 2) when analyzed using a recessive mode of inheritance.

• Download figure
• Open in new tab

Figure 1. Fractional exhaled nitric oxide levels in 643 Black individuals grouped by alpha globin genotype.

DISCUSSION

Alpha and beta globin have recently emerged as regulators of NO signaling in the vascular endothelium and respiratory epithelium, respectively;(3,10) however, there are few studies evaluating the impact of globin gene variants on NO signaling in vivo. In this study, we characterized a common HBA deletion in healthy Black individuals and examined the relationship between HBA copy number and FeNO. We found no association between HBA genotype and FeNO using a pre-specified additive genetic model; however, a post hoc analysis using a recessive mode of inheritance identified homozygosity for the HBA gene deletion to be associated with higher FeNO levels. This latter finding is consistent with the proposed mechanism that alpha globin limits the release of nitric oxide and suggests that lower alpha globin expression allows greater release of NO from respiratory epithelium in healthy, non-asthmatic individuals. More work is needed to understand the role of epithelial alpha globin in the setting of inflammatory lung disease and to determine whether alpha globin interacts with iNOS, which is structurally similar to eNOS, and is expressed under allergic or inflammatory conditions.(12,14)

Study strengths included the large cohort size, representation of an understudied minority population, high frequency of the HBA gene deletion, and a well-defined quantitative outcome measure. Adjustment for serum IgE, which is associated with FeNO, was a strength of this study; however, the absence of evaluation for subclinical IgE sensitization was a limitation. Other limitations included post hoc testing of different genetic inheritance models, performing FeNO measurement at a single flow rate that does not distinguish alveolar from bronchial NO sources,(15) and absence of data on other factors that influence FeNO such as recent upper respiratory tract infection, eosinophilic cationic protein, eosinophil count, neutrophil count, and other inflammatory markers such as periostin.

The genetic epidemiological approach we used relies on variation in the alpha globin gene, which has previously been associated with vascular NO signaling and vascular disease risk, but has not previously been studied in relation to exhaled NO. Our approach did not distinguish between iNOS or eNOS as the source of NO. Our observation of a significant association with alpha thalassemia trait (two alpha globin deletions) and increased FeNO, may be consistent with prior epidemiological studies that noted a positive association with thalassemia and asthma in Taiwanese children.(16) Future studies are needed to better understand the mechanisms by which globins regulate NO signaling in the human respiratory epithelium and whether genetic variation in epithelial globin expression influences asthma risk across different ethnic groups, including those with African ancestry and southeast Asian ancestry.

CONCLUSIONS

HBA copy number was not associated with FeNO among healthy Black adults when analyzed using a prespecified additive genetic model. However, FeNO was found to be higher among subjects who were homozygous for the HBA deletion in a post hoc analysis employing a recessive mode of inheritance. This relationship between HBA copy number and exhaled nitric oxide and merits further study in other populations where alpha globin is polymorphic. The mechanistic link between alpha globin and nitric oxide synthase warrants further characterization to better understand the impact of human genetic variation in alpha globin on respiratory function and health.

SOURCES OF FUNDING

The original study was supported by the Sandler Program for Asthma Research; ES011185 from the National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences; and MO1-RR-30 from the National Center for Research Resources, Clinical Research Centers Program, National Institutes of Health. The current analysis was supported in part by the Divisions of Intramural Research, National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases project AI001150 (A.P.R., J.M.J, C.M.C, J.G.N., M.P. F., H.C.A), National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI) project HL006196 (A.P.R., H.C.A.). This work was also funded in part by NHLBI grants NIH R01-HL107590 and R01HL153641 (L.G.Q.) and the Durham VA Medical Center Research Service (J.B.W.). The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the NIAID or NHLBI. The content of this publication does not necessarily reflect the view or policy of the Department of Health and Human Services, nor does mention of trade names, commercial products or organizations imply endorsement by the government. The interpretation and reporting of these data are the responsibility of the author(s) and in no way should be seen as an official policy or interpretation of the U.S. government.

DISCLOSURES

The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare. All co-authors have seen and agree with the contents of the manuscript and there is no financial interest to report. This article was previously published in abstract form. We certify that the submission is original work and is not under review at any other publication.

Author contributions

All listed authors meet ICJME recommendations for authorship criteria, including substantial contributions to the conception or design of the work (A.P.R., H.C.A., L.G.Q., J.B.W.); or the acquisition, analysis, or interpretation of data for the work (A.P.R., H.C.A., J.M.J., C.J.C., J.G.N., M. P. F., L.G.Q.); Drafting the work (A.P.R.) or revising it critically for important intellectual content and final approval of the version to be published (All).