Abstract
Background Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) enables direct measurements of muscle volume and quality, allowing for an in-depth understanding of their associations with anthropometric traits, and health conditions. However, it is unclear which muscle measurements: total muscle volume, regional measurements or measurements of muscle quality, such as intermuscular adipose tissue (IMAT) or proton density fat fraction (PDFF), are most informative to detect changes and associations with relevant health outcomes such as sarcopenia and frailty.
Methods We developed a pipeline to automatically segment and extract image-derived phenotypes (IDPs) including total and regional muscle volumes and measures of muscle quality, and applied it to the neck-to-knee Dixon images in 44,520 UK Biobank participants. We also segmented paraspinal muscle from 2D quantitative MRI to quantify muscle PDFF and iron concentration. We performed linear regression to assess associations with anthropometric and lifestyle factors. We further applied logistic regression to investigate the association between these IDPs and sarcopenia and frailty.
Results All muscle measurements were negatively associated with age, waist-to-hip ratio, and Townsend deprivation index while they were positively associated with body mass index, alcohol intake, hand grip strength, physical activity and were significantly higher in men. Additionally, IMAT, (corrected for muscle volume) and paraspinal muscle PDFF were significantly higher in female compared with male participants. Sarcopenia was associated with reduced muscle volume, while frailty was associated with increased IMAT and paraspinal PDFF.
Conclusions Our fully automated method enables the quantification of muscle volumes and quality suitable for large population-based studies. While the choice of muscle measurements is important particularly when investigating associations with health conditions, most provide consistent differences relating to the detection of age, sex, body composition and lifestyle changes on muscularity.
Competing Interest Statement
M.C., R.S, and E.P.S. are employees of Calico Life Sciences LLC. Y.L. is a former employee of Calico Life Sciences LLC. M.T., N.B., B.W., J.D.B. and E.L.T. declare no competing interests.
Funding Statement
This work was funded by Calico Life Sciences LLC.
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
The UK Biobank has approval from the North West Multi-Centre Research Ethics Committee (REC reference: 11/NW/0382), and obtained written informed consent from all participants prior to the study. All methods were performed in accordance with the relevant guidelines and regulations as presented by the relevant authorities, including the Declaration of Helsinki.
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.
Yes
Data Availability
The data that support the findings of this study are available from the UK Biobank (https://www.ukbiobank.ac.uk), but restrictions apply to the availability of these data, which were used under license for the current study, and so are not publicly available. Data are however returned by us to the UK Biobank where they will be fully available on request.
