Abstract
Objectives A pitching motion involves three-dimensional whole body movement. Proper pelvic and trunk rotation movement are important for the prevention of throwing injuries. Given that throwing is not a simple rotation movement, the evaluation of proper motion should reflect muscle strength as well as coordination and pitching motion characteristics. We have devised a throwing rotational assessment (TRA) as a new evaluation of the total rotation angle required for throwing. The purpose of this study was to examine the characteristics of players with throwing disorders compared to a pain-free group using TRA.
Materials and methods The subjects consisted of 164 high school baseball pitchers who participated in a medical check. Pain-induced tests included an elbow hyperextension test and an intra-articular shoulder impingement test. Pitchers who felt pain in either test were classified into a disorder group (n=61). With the subjects in a position similar to the foot contact phase of throwing, the rotation angles of the pelvis and trunk were measured. All tests were performed in the throwing and opposite directions.
Results The disorder group had significantly lower average rotation angles of the pelvis and trunk in the throwing direction and the rotation angle of the trunk in the opposite direction compared to the healthy group.
Conclusion TRA reflects the complex whole body rotation movement. Reductions in rotational angles as assessed in TRA may be associated with throwing disorders. TRA is a simple method that may be useful in the early detection of a throwing disorder and could be used in the systematic evaluation during a medical check, as well as during self-check in the sports field.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
The funders did not and will not have a role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
This study was performed in accordance with the declaration of Helsinki after obtaining approval from the ethics committee at Rakuwakai Research Ethics Review Comitee (Raku-gaku-Rin-01-000100)
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.
Yes
Data Availability
The datasets generated and/or analysed during the current study are not publicly available due to limitations of ethical approval involving the patient data and anonymity but are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.
