Abstract
While waning protection from vaccination and natural infection against SARS-CoV-2 infection is well-documented, recent analyses have also found waning of protection against severe COVID-19. This highlights a broader need to understand how different frequency of COVID-19 booster vaccines may mitigate the risk of severe COVID-19, while accounting for waning of protection and differential risk by age and immune status. Here we show that more frequent COVID-19 booster vaccination (every 6-12 months) in older age groups and the immunocompromised population would effectively reduce the burden of severe COVID-19, while frequent boosters in the younger population may only provide modest benefit against severe disease. Analyzing United States COVID-19 surveillance and seroprevalence data in a microsimulation model, we estimated that in persons 75+ years, annual and semiannual boosters would reduce annual absolute risk of severe COVID-19 by 199 (uncertainty interval: 188-229) and 368 (344-413) cases per 100,000 persons, respectively, compared to a one-time booster dose. In contrast, for persons 18-49 years, the model estimated that annual and semiannual boosters would reduce annual absolute risk of severe COVID-19 by 14 (11-19) and 26 (21-35) cases per 100,000 persons, respectively, compared to a one-time booster dose. Persons with prior infection had lower benefit of more frequent boosting, and immunocompromised persons had larger benefit. Scenarios with emerging variants with immune evasion increased the benefit of more frequent variant-targeted boosters. This study underscores the benefit of considering key risk factors to inform frequency of COVID-19 booster vaccines in public health guidance, and ensuring at least annual boosters in high-risk populations.
Competing Interest Statement
NCL reports consulting fees from the World Health Organization related to guidelines on neglected tropical diseases, which are outside the scope of the present work. The remaining authors have no conflicts to declare.
Funding Statement
NCL is supported by the National Institutes of Health, NIAID New Innovator Award (DP2 AI170485). This study is supported by funding from the California Department of Public Health.
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.
Yes
Footnotes
Peer review revision
Data Availability
All analytic code and relevent data are available at [https://github.com/hailey-park/booster-timing].
