Leveraging Artificial Intelligence and Data Science for Integration of Social Determinants of Health in Emergency Medicine: A Scoping Review ============================================================================================================================================ * Donald Apakama * Ethan E Abbott * Lynne Richardson * Lili Chan * Brendan G Carr * Girish N Nadkarni ## Abstract **Objective** Social Determinants of Health (SDOH) are critical drivers of health disparities and patient outcomes. However, accessing and collecting patient level SDOH data can be operationally challenging in the emergency department clinical setting requiring innovative approaches. This scoping review examines the potential of artificial intelligence (AI) and data science for modeling, extraction, and incorporation of SDOH data specifically within emergency departments (ED), further identifying areas for advancement and investigation. **Methods** We conducted a standardized search across Medline (Ovid), Embase (Ovid), CINAHL, Web of Science, and ERIC databases for studies published between 2015-2022. We focused on identifying studies employing AI or data science related to SDOH within emergency care contexts or conditions. Two specialized reviewers in Emergency Medicine and clinical informatics independently assessed each article, resolving discrepancies through iterative reviews and discussion. We then extracted data covering study details, methodologies, patient demographics, care settings, and principal outcomes. **Results** Of the 1,047 studies screened, 26 met the inclusion criteria. Notably, 9 out of 26 studies were solely concentrated on ED patients. Conditions studied spanned broad Emergency Medicine complaints and conditions including sepsis, acute myocardial infarction, and asthma. The majority (n=16) explored multiple SDOH domains, with homelessness/housing insecurity and neighborhood/built environment predominating. Machine learning (ML) techniques were utilized in 23 of the studies, natural language processing (NLP) being the most common approach used (n=11). Rule-based (n=5), deep learning (n=2), and pattern matching (n=4) were the most common NLP techniques used. NLP models in the reviewed studies displayed significant predictive performance with outcomes, With F1-scores ranging between 0.40 - 0.75 and specificities nearing 95.9%. **Conclusion** Although in its infancy, the convergence of AI and data science techniques, especially ML and NLP, with SDOH in Emergency Medicine offers transformative possibilities for better usage and integration of social data into clinical care and research. With a significant focus on the ED and notable NLP model performance, there is an imperative to standardize SDOH data collection, refine algorithms for diverse patient groups, and champion interdisciplinary synergies. These efforts aim to harness SDOH data optimally, enhancing patient care and mitigating health disparities. Our research underscores the vital need for continued investigation in this domain. Keywords * data science * artificial intelligence * scoping review * social determinants of health * emergency medicine ## Introduction Medical care, while crucial, contributes to only about 20% of the modifiable factors influencing a population’s health outcomes, while 80% are influenced by genetics, individual behaviors, and socioeconomic factors. The latter two form the Social Determinants of Health (SDOH)1 that operate at various levels. From macroeconomic policies of nations to public education and housing policies, these structural factors shape resource distribution and societal positions. Consequently, they influence living conditions, access to essential resources, and daily life circumstances, ultimately molding health, and health disparities.2 Every patient’s health trajectory is influenced by SDOH, which can manifest positively (e.g., high income, food security) or adversely.3 The negative aspects can be categorized into social risks, conditions linked to poor health, and social needs, which are individual preferences for assistance.4 These determinants, especially when adverse, can hinder optimal care and impact clinical outcomes.5 Emergency Medicine (EM) is a unique medical specialty. It can both identify and address adverse SDOH, making it a pivotal setting for intervention. The high prevalence of social needs among emergency department (ED) patients, especially those with low socioeconomic status, housing insecurity, or limited access to care, underscores the potential of ED-based SDOH interventions.6, 7 However, there are significant challenges; comprehensive social risk screenings in the ED are often impractical due to patient volume, acuity, and health system financial constraints. Relying solely on electronic health records (EHRs) is time-consuming and inconsistent. Furthermore, the scattered and unstructured nature of SDOH data in EHRs makes it difficult for ED physicians to identify patients with adverse SDOH.8–10 Social informatics refers to the interdisciplinary study of the design, uses, and consequences of information technologies in the context of social and organizational settings. It bridges the gap between the technical and social worlds, offering insights into how technology and societal factors interplay. The vast possibilities of social informatics lie in its potential to reshape how we understand, interpret, and act on social data in healthcare settings. By integrating social data with health data, it aims to enhance clinical care and overall health outcomes.11 Techniques like Natural Language Processing (NLP), Artificial Intelligence (AI), and Machine Learning (ML) are being harnessed to extract, utilize, and model SDOH data effectively.12–14 While existing literature has touched upon SDOH in the ED, a comprehensive review focusing on the application of data sciences in this context is lacking. This scoping review aims to map the current literature, pinpoint areas for future research, and highlight the transformative potential of integrating data sciences into EM SDOH research. ## Methods ### Data Sources and Literature Search Strategy To capture the evolving role of AI data science in Emergency Medicine, particularly around a SDOH and social context, we searched the literature from 2015 to 2022, a period marked by rapid advancements in AI applications in healthcare. We included articles from databases such as Medline (Ovid), Embase (Ovid), CINAHL, Web of Science, and ERIC, prioritizing research that melded data science with emergency care settings. Our search encompassed terms related to SDOH, data science techniques such as machine learning algorithms, natural language processing, and artificial intelligence, and Emergency Medicine (see supplemental table 1 for search terms utilized). View this table: [Supplemental Table 1:](http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2023/10/18/2023.10.17.23297158/T1) Supplemental Table 1: Finalized search strategies ### Article Selection We focused our review on studies leveraging data science techniques to extract or model SDOH data in EM. Recognizing the paucity of EM-specific research using AI/ML algorithms, we also considered studies on emergency-related conditions that might be seen in other clinical non-ED settings. This included conditions such as opioid use disorder (OUD), HIV, and epilepsy. We intentionally excluded COVID-19 studies, given their unique characteristics and volume of literature. This exclusion ensured a more focused review with current relevance. Two independent reviewers (DA and EA) assessed titles and abstracts for final inclusion. Any disagreements were resolved through joint discussions. We utilized Covidence (Covidence systematic review software, Veritas Health Innovation, Melbourne, Australia), a standardized systematic review software. ### Data Extraction We extracted data from the selected studies using a standardized form, ensuring uniformity. We captured study objectives, methods, clinical care setting, machine learning algorithms, modeling approaches, and specified outcomes (see Supplemental Table 2). We focused on data science, AI and machine learning algorithms, SDOH domains, and clinical outcomes. While our focus remains descriptive, we abstained from a quality assessment, aligning with standard scoping review guidelines. View this table: [Supplemental Table 2:](http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2023/10/18/2023.10.17.23297158/T2) Supplemental Table 2: Database of Publications Meeting Final Inclusion Criteria ## Results ### Overall Study Characteristics After screening 1,047 studies, 26 met our final inclusion criteria (Figure 1 and Supplemental Table 1). We excluded a significant number of studies because they did not focus on Emergency Medicine conditions or complaints and did not employ AI/ML techniques in overall approach to study question. Most studies were published after 2020 (Figure 2) and included patient populations focusing exclusively on the ED (n=9), pediatric patients (n=2), patients treated by emergency medical services (EMS) (n=2), and US Veterans (n=2) among examples. ![Figure 1:](http://medrxiv.org/http://medrxiv.stage.highwire.org/content/medrxiv/early/2023/10/18/2023.10.17.23297158/F1.medium.gif) [Figure 1:](http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2023/10/18/2023.10.17.23297158/F1) Figure 1: Preferred Reporting for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis Flow Chart (PRISMA) Diagram. 2015-2022 search of Medline (Ovid), Embase (Ovid), Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL), Web of Science, and Education Resource Information Center (ERIC). ![Figure 2:](http://medrxiv.org/http://medrxiv.stage.highwire.org/content/medrxiv/early/2023/10/18/2023.10.17.23297158/F2.medium.gif) [Figure 2:](http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2023/10/18/2023.10.17.23297158/F2) Figure 2: Number of publications by year (2015-2022) identified in this review. Word clouds show main themes of papers for the corresponding year. ### SDOH Domains Over 60% of studies we identified (n =16) employed, modeled, or extracted features across multiple SDOH domains, resulting in significant overlap across publications included in this review (figure 2 word cloud). These domains included housing insecurity and homelessness, neighborhood and built environment, income and socioeconomic status, employment, family and social support, food insecurity, insurance status and stability, and history of incarceration. While individual level SDOH data was the prevalent unit of analysis, 5 studies used area level data or aggregated measures such as the Social Deprivation Index (SDI), Area Deprivation Index (ADI), or the Gini coefficient. Housing insecurity and homelessness emerged as the most predominate SDOH domains assessed among 23% of the studies identified (n=6). The domain of neighborhood and built environment was also present across multiple studies and the focus of several publications (n=4). Exposure to or history of incarceration (n=2) as well as opioid use disorder (n=2) were also notable. ### Exploration of Emergency Medicine Conditions The scope of EM clinical conditions and complaints that studied were broad, including sepsis, acute myocardial infarction, heart failure, asthma, diabetes, chest pain, and epilepsy (Figure 3). Sepsis was the only specific EM condition we identified in more than one study (n =2). Several studies focused on all cause ED revisits (n=2), “preventable visits” and admissions (n=2), and ED utilization (n=2). ![Figure 3:](http://medrxiv.org/http://medrxiv.stage.highwire.org/content/medrxiv/early/2023/10/18/2023.10.17.23297158/F3.medium.gif) [Figure 3:](http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2023/10/18/2023.10.17.23297158/F3) Figure 3: Emergency Medicine Conditions Word Cloud. ### AI/ML Algorithms Machine learning (ML) techniques were employed in 23 studies, encompassing methods like random forest, CART, support vector machines, neural networks, and natural language processing (NLP) (Figures 4 and 5). Of these, Random Forest emerged as the most popular (n = 13), closely followed by NLP (n =11). Key algorithms are discussed in in further detail. ![Figure 4:](http://medrxiv.org/http://medrxiv.stage.highwire.org/content/medrxiv/early/2023/10/18/2023.10.17.23297158/F4.medium.gif) [Figure 4:](http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2023/10/18/2023.10.17.23297158/F4) Figure 4: Overall counts of AI/ML algorithms employed. ![Figure 5:](http://medrxiv.org/http://medrxiv.stage.highwire.org/content/medrxiv/early/2023/10/18/2023.10.17.23297158/F5.medium.gif) [Figure 5:](http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2023/10/18/2023.10.17.23297158/F5) Figure 5: Overall counts/percentages of Random Forest techniques employed for extraction of SDOH data. ### Random Forest in SDOH Variable Classification and Data Management Random Forest, an advanced ensemble machine learning method, was notably present across multiple studies identified in this review. This technique was used to discern and highlight pivotal SDOH variables. Its ability to create predictive models, offering foresight into potential health trajectories based on the subtleties of SDOH indicators, was also evident. The most common use of Random Forest, however, was to address missing EHR data, ensuring the integrity and robustness of analyses. Beyond its analytical capabilities, it was also used to create insightful visual representations, offering a comprehensive view into the intricate web of variables, their interactions, and their overarching impact on disease states like ACS, Epilepsy, Asthma, and OUD. ### Natural Language Processing for SDOH Data Extraction The integration of Natural Language Processing (NLP) in the realm of Emergency Medicine offers a promising avenue for the precise extraction of Social Determinants of Health (SDOH) from electronic health records (EHR). Traditional methodologies, such as manual reviews and rudimentary keyword searches, are increasingly recognized for their inherent limitations, particularly in the context of vast and intricate EHR datasets. Our scoping review elucidated the prevalence of several NLP techniques in the field. Text representation methods like Term Frequency - Inverse Document Frequency (TF-IDF) (n = 4), Bag of Words (n = 3), and Word2Vec (n = 1) were prominently utilized, underscoring their fundamental role in converting textual data into computationally amenable formats (figure 6). In the realm of topic modeling and semantic analysis, Latent Dirichlet Allocation (LDA) was noted in 2 studies, highlighting its potential in discerning latent topics within medical records. Approaches favored Rule-Based methodologies, found in 5 studies, followed by Deep Learning (n = 2) particularly structures like BI-LSTM (Bi-directional long short-term memory) and Pattern Matching (n = 4). From a software perspective, both proprietary (n = 5) and open source (n = 6) tools were harnessed, reflecting the diverse ecosystem of NLP tools available for research. These NLP methodologies, especially the dominant ones like Bag of Words, TF-IDF, and deep learning structures, have demonstrated notable efficacy. However, to achieve the pinnacle of precision in SDOH data extraction, it is imperative to continually refine these NLP techniques. Collaborative endeavors involving domain experts, iterative model training, and the assimilation of multifaceted data sources are paramount to enhancing the accuracy and relevance of extracted insights. ![Figure 6:](http://medrxiv.org/http://medrxiv.stage.highwire.org/content/medrxiv/early/2023/10/18/2023.10.17.23297158/F6.medium.gif) [Figure 6:](http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2023/10/18/2023.10.17.23297158/F6) Figure 6: Overall counts of NLP techniques employed for extraction of SDOH data. ### Health Information Exchange (HIE) for SDOH Data Aggregation HIE, featured in 4 out of 26 studies, aggregates patient data across healthcare entities, providing a comprehensive view of a patient’s clinical journey. With 40% of patients in one study having encounters at multiple organizations, the importance of HIE in reflecting the distributed nature of ED care becomes evident. HIE can aid in analyzing care transitions and augmenting the sample size and diversity for SDOH research. However, challenges like data sharing, data quality, and privacy regulations need to be addressed. In essence, HIE holds immense potential for Emergency Medicine research, offering both multi-organizational and community-level insights. ![Figure 7:](http://medrxiv.org/http://medrxiv.stage.highwire.org/content/medrxiv/early/2023/10/18/2023.10.17.23297158/F7.medium.gif) [Figure 7:](http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2023/10/18/2023.10.17.23297158/F7) Figure 7: Overall counts for identified articles by AI/ML Domain and/or task. ### Predictive Applications A total of 19 studies presented a diverse array of machine learning strategies, each tailored for distinct predictive outcomes. The efficacy of predictive models was a pivotal outcome in 10 studies. Performance metrics for these models, when used as a primary outcome, showcased a range of F1-scores from 0.4 up to 0.75, indicating varied precision and recall across studies. These ranged from supervised models like random forest classifiers for acute coronary syndrome predictions to neural networks targeting sepsis-related readmission risks. Notably, ensemble methods were adeptly utilized to discern primary risk factors for opioid use disorders. Within this realm, NLP proved instrumental, particularly in classification tasks, risk stratification, and fortifying clinical decision-making processes. Beyond this, key outcomes highlighted patterns in ED revisits (n = 6), in-hospital mortality (n = 2), algorithmic bias (n =1), and mismatches between physician annotations and claims data (n =1). ### Data Quality, Privacy, and Algorithmic Bias In the comprehensive spectrum of studies analyzed, an intriguing observation surfaced: a noticeable gap in the examination of data quality and privacy concerns within the realm of SDOH and Emergency Medicine. Despite sifting through a multitude of research articles, we did not encounter any study that directly tackled these pivotal issues. This omission underlines the potential vulnerabilities in the application of AI and ML techniques, especially when handling sensitive patient data. Furthermore, a singular study broached the topic of algorithmic bias, a topic of paramount importance given the potential repercussions on healthcare outcomes and equity. The underrepresentation of these themes hints at uncharted territories that warrant meticulous exploration in future research endeavors, ensuring that the integration of AI and ML in Emergency Medicine is both robust and ethically sound. ## Discussion The leveraging of SDOH data within EM research and clinical care is pivotal for gaining new insights, improving patient outcomes, and optimizing healthcare delivery. Our scoping review highlights the transformative role of data science, chiefly AI/ML, and the subdiscipline of NLP, in improving SDOH data integration and modeling within EM. Emerging from our review is an increase towards employing data science to harness, operationalize, and model SDOH in emergency care settings. This progression signifies a shift: a pivot towards a comprehensive, data-infused approach that addresses not just emergent conditions but also the intricate web of social and economic determinants impacting health. NLP excels at extracting SDOH information from the unstructured text of electronic health records, while ML’s predictive strength can transform these insights into actionable predictions. Such models, equipped with SDOH data, can catalyze precision interventions, potentially identifying mechanisms for ED revisits, in- hospital mortality, and readmissions. Delving deeper into the SDOH domains, housing insecurity and the neighborhood environment emerged as primary determinants, witnessing significant attention across the studies. Their frequent appearance in the research landscape underscores their profound impact on health outcomes within emergency settings. While these domains were at the forefront, other determinants like education, employment, and social networks were also featured, albeit to a lesser extent. The emphasis on these SDOH domains, especially housing insecurity, suggests a pressing need for targeted interventions and policies within emergency care settings. As the healthcare sector continues to evolve, understanding these predominant SDOH domains and harnessing the power of data science will be pivotal in offering a more holistic, patient-centric approach to emergency care. Our comprehensive review, while offering insights, bears certain limitations warranting acknowledgment. The time frame for our study, confined to 2015 to 2022, captures most contemporary advancements but might inadvertently omit foundational studies predating this period, potentially offering evolutionary insights. While we highlighted NLP and other ML techniques, the vast expanse of data science boasts other emerging tools such as the recent and rapid development of Large Language Modeling (LLMs) such as ChatGPT, which were absent in our review. The potential applications of LLMs in harnessing and modeling SDOH within the EM setting are rapidly emerging and will likely expand the possibilities for improving health outcomes and disparities. Secondly, the encompassing scope of our review, spanning diverse SDOH domains and emergency conditions, enriches the study’s comprehensiveness. Yet, the scope also poses challenges in distilling specific conclusions regarding the utility of data science techniques across distinct SDOH or EM conditions. Comparative analysis across studies was hampered by the varied outcome measures adopted. Although a significant number honed in on the performance of predictive models, this only scratches the surface of data science’s potential impact on SDOH within EM. Lastly, our review refrained from assessing the methodological quality of the incorporated studies. This approach aligns with scoping review guidelines but omits considerations of each study’s methodological soundness during our synthesis. Amidst these intricacies and challenges, there are still other pressing concerns. Data quality, privacy concerns, and algorithmic biases are potential hurdles that merit attention. In particular, the limited exploration and assessment of algorithmic bias in our reviewed studies, given its potential to perpetuate healthcare disparities, suggests an urgent avenue for further investigation. Only one study we identified in our review specifically assessed ML model bias and fairness in the context of heart failure outcomes.15 ML algorithmic biases are critical to address in the context of SDOH research as prior studies have demonstrated the potential for reinforcement of pre-existing racial, ethnic, and socioeconomic disparities.16 ### Future Works and Recommendations #### Potential Areas of Exploration Our review has illuminated the significance of certain domains like housing insecurity within the context of SDOH in Emergency Medicine. However, the vast landscape of SDOH offers numerous other domains that remain relatively unexplored: 1. Education: Investigating the role of educational attainment and access to quality education can provide insights into its impact on health outcomes. For instance, understanding how literacy levels influence patient adherence to medical advice in emergency settings could be pivotal. 2. Employment: Employment status, job security, and workplace conditions can have profound effects on mental and physical health. Exploring these factors can shed light on stress-related conditions or injuries that present in emergency departments. 3. Social Networks: The influence of social support systems, community engagement, and familial ties can play a crucial role in patient recovery and mental well-being. Delving into these aspects can offer a holistic view of a patient’s environment and its implications on health. With these potential areas in mind, it becomes evident that a multi-faceted approach to SDOH within Emergency Medicine is the way forward. Building on these areas of exploration, we propose several recommendations to harness the full potential of SDOH in Emergency Medicine. #### Recommendations 1. Establishing Gold Standard Metrics: For the evolution and standardization of emergency SDOH research, it is essential to define and adopt gold standard metrics. These metrics should be robust, universally accepted, and tailored to capture the nuances of SDOH in emergency settings. Collaborative efforts among researchers, clinicians, and policymakers should be made to create these benchmarks. 2. Innovative Data Capture: The high-paced nature of emergency settings necessitates innovative solutions for capturing SDOH data. Leveraging AI-assisted tools or predictive algorithms based on existing patient data could offer one approach. 3. Algorithmic Innovation: The prominence of machine learning and NLP in our findings suggests a horizon brimming with algorithmic advancements and adaptation for Emergency Medicine. As these tools evolve, and new tools emerge, crafting and evaluating interventions tailored to specific SDOH is crucial. 4. Connecting SDOH with Clinical Outcomes: Beyond identifying SDOH, understanding their tangible impact on patient outcomes is vital. A concerted effort in this direction can revolutionize our care approach. 5. Interdisciplinary Collaboration: The confluence of expertise, from clinicians to data scientists, will be instrumental in harnessing the full potential of SDOH data. 6. Addressing Algorithmic Bias: As we increasingly rely on algorithms, it is imperative to ensure they are free from biases that could perpetuate or exacerbate health disparities. Rigorous testing, validation, and refinement of algorithms, with a focus on fairness and equity, should be prioritized. ### Conclusion This scoping review underscores the transformative potential of data science in elevating the understanding and application of Social Determinants of Health (SDOH) within Emergency Medicine. Through the adept integration of data science methodologies, particularly machine learning and natural language processing, we are poised to redefine the way SDOH data is adopted within EM. This offers a broader and more data-informed approach to influencing critical patient outcomes. The literature landscape indicates a promising embrace of this cross-disciplinary synergy, manifesting in an increasing number of studies that deploy data science methodologies to unearth, interpret, or model SDOH within emergency care contexts. Such a trajectory not only affirms the growing acknowledgment of these methodologies’ efficacy but also underlines the healthcare sector’s commitment to delivering more holistic care. Nevertheless, our review also pinpoints avenues that warrant deeper exploration. Despite the expansive focus on various SDOH domains, certain determinants like housing insecurity and the neighborhood environment have garnered disproportionate attention. A more balanced exploration across SDOH domains would provide a richer, more comprehensive insight into their collective and individual impacts on patient trajectories. Moreover, while the current trend leans heavily on machine learning and natural language processing, there exists a vast expanse of data science techniques yet to be fully leveraged like large language modeling (LLMs). Diving into these untapped methodologies might further refine our capabilities in SDOH identification and intervention. In conclusion, the fusion of data science with Emergency Medicine marks the dawn of a new healthcare epoch. It envisions a future where Emergency Departments transcend their traditional roles, evolving into hubs that address the foundational SDOH challenges within communities. As we navigate this promising trajectory, the potential to revolutionize EM and fortify patient-centric care is immense. ## Data Availability All data produced in the present study are available upon reasonable request to the authors ## Financial Support none ## Acknowledgements none * Received October 17, 2023. * Revision received October 17, 2023. * Accepted October 18, 2023. * © 2023, Posted by Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory This pre-print is available under a Creative Commons License (Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 4.0 International), CC BY-NC-ND 4.0, as described at [http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/](http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) ## References 1. 1.Hood, C.M., et al., County Health Rankings: Rela3onships Between Determinant Factors and Health Outcomes. Am J Prev Med, 2016. 50(2): p. 129–35. [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1016/j.amepre.2015.08.024&link_type=DOI) [PubMed](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=http://www.n&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fmedrxiv%2Fearly%2F2023%2F10%2F18%2F2023.10.17.23297158.atom) 2. 2.Shah, R., et al., A Scoping Review of Current Social Emergency Medicine Research. West J Emerg Med, 2021. 22(6): p. 1360–1368. 3. 3.Malecha, P.W., et al., Material Needs of Emergency Department Pa3ents: A Systema3c Review. Acad Emerg Med, 2018. 25(3): p. 330–359. 4. 4.Alderwick, H. and L.M. GoOlieb, Meanings and Misunderstandings: A Social Determinants of Health Lexicon for Health Care Systems. Milbank Q, 2019. 97(2): p. 407–419. [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1111/1468-0009.12390&link_type=DOI) [PubMed](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=http://www.n&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fmedrxiv%2Fearly%2F2023%2F10%2F18%2F2023.10.17.23297158.atom) 5. 5.Hosseinpoor, A.R., N. Bergen, and A. Schlotheuber, Promo3ng health equity: WHO health inequality monitoring at global and na3onal levels. Glob Health AcVon, 2015. 8: p. 29034. 6. 6.Kangovi, S., et al., Understanding why pa3ents of low socioeconomic status prefer hospitals over ambulatory care. Health Aff (Millwood), 2013. 32(7): p. 1196–203. [Abstract/FREE Full Text](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/ijlink/YTozOntzOjQ6InBhdGgiO3M6MTQ6Ii9sb29rdXAvaWpsaW5rIjtzOjU6InF1ZXJ5IjthOjQ6e3M6ODoibGlua1R5cGUiO3M6NDoiQUJTVCI7czoxMToiam91cm5hbENvZGUiO3M6OToiaGVhbHRoYWZmIjtzOjU6InJlc2lkIjtzOjk6IjMyLzcvMTE5NiI7czo0OiJhdG9tIjtzOjUwOiIvbWVkcnhpdi9lYXJseS8yMDIzLzEwLzE4LzIwMjMuMTAuMTcuMjMyOTcxNTguYXRvbSI7fXM6ODoiZnJhZ21lbnQiO3M6MDoiIjt9) 7. 7.Samuels-Kalow, M.E., et al., The terminology of social emergency medicine: Measuring social determinants of health, social risk, and social need. J Am Coll Emerg Physicians Open, 2020. 1(5): p. 852–856. 8. 8.Adler, N.E. and W.W. Stead, Pa3ents in context--EHR capture of social and behavioral determinants of health. N Engl J Med, 2015. 372(8): p. 698–701. [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1056/NEJMp1413945&link_type=DOI) [PubMed](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=25693009&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fmedrxiv%2Fearly%2F2023%2F10%2F18%2F2023.10.17.23297158.atom) 9. 9.Chen, M., X. Tan, and R. Padman, Social determinants of health in electronic health records and their impact on analysis and risk predic3on: A systema3c review. J Am Med Inform Assoc, 2020. 27(11): p. 1764–1773. [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1093/jamia/ocaa143&link_type=DOI) 10. 10.Cook, L.A., J. Sachs, and N.G. Weiskopf, The quality of social determinants data in the electronic health record: a systema3c review. J Am Med Inform Assoc, 2021. 29(1): p. 187–196. 11. 11.Pantell, M.S., et al., A call for social informa3cs. J Am Med Inform Assoc, 2020. 27(11): p. 1798–1801. [PubMed](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=http://www.n&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fmedrxiv%2Fearly%2F2023%2F10%2F18%2F2023.10.17.23297158.atom) 12. 12.Dorr, D., et al., Iden3fying Pa3ents with Significant Problems Related to Social Determinants of Health with Natural Language Processing. Stud Health Technol Inform, 2019. 264: p. 1456–1457. [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.3233/SHTI190482&link_type=DOI) [PubMed](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=http://www.n&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fmedrxiv%2Fearly%2F2023%2F10%2F18%2F2023.10.17.23297158.atom) 13. 13.Patra, B.G., et al., Extrac3ng social determinants of health from electronic health records using natural language processing: a systema3c review. J Am Med Inform Assoc, 2021. 28(12): p. 2716–2727. [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1093/JAMIA/OCAB170&link_type=DOI) 14. 14.Conway, M., et al., Moonstone: a novel natural language processing system for inferring social risk from clinical narra3ves. J Biomed SemanVcs, 2019. 10(1): p. 6. 15. 15.Li, Y., H. Wang, and Y. Luo, Improving Fairness in the Predic3on of Heart Failure Length of Stay and Mortality by Integra3ng Social Determinants of Health. Circ Heart Fail, 2022. 15(11): p. e009473. 16. 16.Obermeyer, Z., et al., Dissec3ng racial bias in an algorithm used to manage the health of popula3ons. Science, 2019. 366(6464): p. 447–453. [Abstract/FREE Full Text](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/ijlink/YTozOntzOjQ6InBhdGgiO3M6MTQ6Ii9sb29rdXAvaWpsaW5rIjtzOjU6InF1ZXJ5IjthOjQ6e3M6ODoibGlua1R5cGUiO3M6NDoiQUJTVCI7czoxMToiam91cm5hbENvZGUiO3M6Mzoic2NpIjtzOjU6InJlc2lkIjtzOjEyOiIzNjYvNjQ2NC80NDciO3M6NDoiYXRvbSI7czo1MDoiL21lZHJ4aXYvZWFybHkvMjAyMy8xMC8xOC8yMDIzLjEwLjE3LjIzMjk3MTU4LmF0b20iO31zOjg6ImZyYWdtZW50IjtzOjA6IiI7fQ==)