Abstract
Background Multi-voxel neuro-reinforcement has been shown to selectively reduce amygdala reactivity in response to feared stimuli, but the precise mechanisms supporting these effects are still unknown. The current pilot study seeks to identify potential intermediaries of change using functional brain connectivity at rest.
Methods Individuals (N = 11) diagnosed with at least two animal subtype specific phobias took part in a double-blind multi-voxel neuro-reinforcement clinical trial targeting one of two phobic animals, with the untargeted animal as placebo control. Changes in whole-brain resting state functional connectivity from pre-treatment to post-treatment were measured using group ICA. These changes were tested to see if they predicted the previously observed decreases in amygdala reactivity in response to images of target phobic animals.
Results A common functional connectivity network overlapping with the visual network was identified in resting state data pre-treatment and post-treatment. Significant increases in functional connectivity in this network from pre-treatment to post-treatment were found in higher level visual and cognitive processing regions of the brain. Increases in functional connectivity in these regions also significantly predicted decreases in task-based amygdala reactivity to targeted phobic animals following multi-voxel neuro-reinforcement. Specifically, greater increases of functional connectivity pre-treatment to post-treatment were associated with greater decreases of amygdala reactivity to target phobic stimuli pre-treatment to post-treatment.
Conclusions These findings provide preliminary evidence that multi-voxel neuro-reinforcement can induce persisting functional connectivity changes in the brain. Moreover, these changes in functional connectivity were not limited to the direct area of neuro-reinforcement, suggesting neuro-reinforcement may change how the targeted region interacts with other brain regions. Identification of these brain regions represent a first step towards explaining the underlying mechanisms of change in previous multi-voxel neuro-reinforcement studies. Future research should seek to replicate these effects in a larger sample size to further assess their role in the effects observed from multi-voxel neuro-reinforcement.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Clinical Trial
NCT03655262
Funding Statement
HL received financial support from the US National Institute of Mental Health (R61MH113772) and The Templeton World Charity Foundation (RA537-01). MK was supported by AMED under grant number JP18dm0307008. MGC received financial support from the US National Institute of Mental Health (R61MH113772). VT-D received financial support from the Fonds de Recherche du Quebec - Sante (FRQS).
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
IRB of University of California, Los Angeles gave ethical approval for this work.
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.
Yes
Data Availability
All data produced in the present study are available upon reasonable request to the authors.
