ABSTRACT
This article discusses a philosophical overview of discharge planning for stroke patients from an ontological, epistemological, and axiological point of view, emphasizing the importance of this process in ensuring proper care after leaving the treatment facility. With a focus on the philosophy of nursing science, the study is a literature review that follows the PRISMA (2017-2023) guidelines with keyword searches for “discharge planning,” “stroke,” “patients,” and “RCT” in Scopus, Science Direct, and ProQuest databases. Of the 281 articles identified, the inclusion criteria involved quantitative research design, publications in English, studies in adult patients with strokes, intervention discharge planning, and analysis supporting discharge planning in stroke patients. The selection process uses the Rayyan application and selects 22 relevant studies. The analysis was done with PICO synthesis and grouping based on the Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Review. Methodological quality assessment using the Joanna Briggs Institute Critical Assessment tool shows that a multidisciplinary approach through ontological, epistemological, and axiological studies provides a strong foundation for improving clinical practice and health information systems. Close collaboration between care teams, patients, and families in discharge planning is emphasized for optimal treatment of stroke patients and the development of efficient health information systems. The practical implications of this research include integrating ontological concepts, deep understanding of knowledge, applying ethical values, and improving discharge planning processes to improve care for stroke patients.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
This study did not receive any funding
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.
Yes
Footnotes
e-mail: dwi.retnaningsih-2023{at}fkp.unair.ac.id, dwi.retnaningsih{at}uwhs.ac.id
Data Availability
All data produced in the present work are contained in the manuscript
