Racial and ethnic associations with interstitial lung disease and healthcare utilization in patients with systemic sclerosis ============================================================================================================================ * Ann-Marcia C. Tukpah * Jonathan A. Rose * Diane L. Seger * Gary Matt Hunninghake * David W. Bates ## Abstract **Rationale** Racial and ethnic differences in presentation and outcomes have been reported in systemic sclerosis (SSc) and SSc-interstitial lung disease (ILD). However, diverse cohorts and additional modeling can improve understanding of risk features and outcomes, which is important for reducing associated disparities. **Objective(s)** To determine if there are racial/ethnic differences associated with SSc-ILD risk and age; time intervals between SSc and ILD, and with emergency department (ED) visit or hospitalization rates. **Methods** A retrospective cohort study using electronic health record data from an integrated health system, over a 5.5 year period was conducted using clinical and sociodemographic variables, models were generated with sequential adjustments for these variables. Logistic regression models were used to examine the association of covariates with ILD and age at SSc-ILD. Healthcare outcomes were analyzed with complementary log-log regression models. **Results** The cohort included 756 adults (83.6% female, 80.3% non-Hispanic White) with SSc with a mean age of 59 years. Overall, 33.7% of patients in the cohort had an ILD code, with increased odds for Asian (odds ratio [OR], 2.59; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.29, 5.18; *P*=.007) compared to White patients. The age in years of patients with SSc-ILD was younger for Hispanic (mean difference, −6.5; 95% CI, −13, −0.21; *P* = 0.04) and Black/African American patients (−10; 95% CI −16, −4.9; *P* <0.001) compared to White patients. Black/African American patients were more likely to have an ILD code before an SSc code (59% compared to 20.6% of White patients), and had the shortest interval from SSc to ILD (3 months). Black/African American (HR, 2.59; 95% CI 1.47, 4.49; *P*=0.001) and Hispanic patients (HR 2.29; 95% CI 1.37, 3.82; *P*=0.002) had higher rates of an ED visit. **Conclusion** In this study, SSc-ILD presentation and outcomes differed by racial/ethnic group (increased odds of SSc-ILD, younger age at SSc-ILD, and preceding diagnosis with respect to SSc, rates of ED visit), some of which was attenuated with adjustment for clinical and sociodemographic characteristics. Differing presentation may be driven by social drivers of health (SDOH), autoantibody profiles, or other key unmeasured factors contributing to susceptibility and severity. Key words * scleroderma * pulmonary fibrosis * emergency department * hospitalization * race/ethnicity * electronic health record Systemic sclerosis (SSc) is a chronic autoimmune disease characterized by immune dysregulation, vasculopathy, and multiorgan fibrosis, with lung disease (interstitial lung disease or ILD) and/or pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH)) as the leading cause of death.1,2 SSc-ILD is heterogeneous in progression and outcomes,3 significant pulmonary function decline4 and ILD development occur early.5 Therefore, timely identification of SSc-ILD is essential.6,7 Numerous studies suggest that race and ethnicity may be important factors in SSc-ILD presentation and outcomes. Racial/ethnic differences in age at SSc diagnosis have been reported in observational SSc cohorts,8–10 and age at SSc-ILD in clinical trial participants.11 Furthermore, the differential prevalence of SSc-ILD is demonstrated within multi-racial/ethnic cohorts.12–14 Black/African American race has been associated with a lower forced vital capacity (FVC),15 an increased odds of restrictive lung disease (RLD),16 and pulmonary fibrosis (PF).9 Despite these findings, some of these results are limited by sample size and SSc subtype,15 or lung disease severity,9 adjustment for important covariates,14 and the numbers of different racial/ethnic groups compared.12 SSc-ILD is known to be a principal cause of hospitalization,6 with increased healthcare utilization in patients with ILD,17 but there has been limited assessment of the impact of racial/ethnic differences on clinical outcomes such as emergency department (ED) visits,18 and hospitalizations.19–21 Further inquiry and analyses to expand understanding of possible informative traits of patient groups, and their impact on variability of presentation and trajectory can improve overall outcomes. We hypothesized that among patients with SSc there would be important differences among racial/ethnic groups in ILD incidence, age at presentation, timing with respect to a SSc diagnosis, and important outcomes such as ED visits and hospitalizations. To test these hypotheses, we assessed an electronic health record (EHR) based cohort of patients with SSc from Mass General Brigham (MGB), an integrated multi-hospital healthcare system.22 ## Methods ### Study Population and Variables We performed a retrospective cohort study and selected study participants from MGB integrated health-system databases: the Research Patient Data Registry (RPDR) and Enterprise Data Warehouse (EDW). The cohort of 788 patients with SSc was created using a previously published algorithm in which patients with >=2 SSc International Classification of Diseases, Tenth Revision (ICD-10) codes were identified from January 1, 2016 through June 30, 2021.22 We identified patients with ILD using >=1 ILD ICD-10 codes (Table E1), sourced from encounters, billing, and the problem list. The first instance that the code was documented during the study period was considered the index date for SSc, and first ever code for ILD (specifically the earliest date as it could occur prior to SSc). Among the 788 patients, 756 who had an ILD code (or did not have a code) before or during the study period were included in the analyses (exclusions: n=31 with ILD code after the study period and n=1 American Indian or Alaska Native patient). Hereafter, SSc and ILD ICD-10 codes are referred to as SSc or ILD diagnosis respectively. Age at SSc and SSc-ILD were determined by age at index code use (if age at SSc-ILD preceded SSc age, it is denoted as negative). Data elements including demographics (self-reported race/ethnicity), Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI), medications, laboratory data, ED and hospitalization visits, median income imputed by zipcode in 2018, education, insurance, and employment status were collected. Race/ethnicity (recorded as “Black or African American” and, reported as Black/African American; Hispanic ethnicity is inclusive of all racial groups) data were missing for 34 patients, further chart review provided information for an additional 10 patients. Organ system involvement was based on selected ICD-10 codes for gastro-esophageal reflux disease (GERD), esophageal disease, Raynaud, pulmonary hypertension (PHTN), chronic kidney disease (CKD) and acute kidney injury (AKI). Ever order of a medication was determined by any prescription order available in our system during the study period but does not represent dispense nor use history. Missing rate for variables were race/ethnicity (n=21, 2.8%), 2018 median family income (n=17, 2.2%), smoking (n = 290, 38.3%), education (n=130, 17.2%), employment (n=44, 5.8%). Missing data were imputed using Multiple Imputation by Chain Equations23 (MICE, version 3.15.0) with the predictive mean matching method for continuous median income, logreg method for binary employment and education, and polytomous regression method for multi-level categorical variables (race/ethnicity, smoking24). Five iterations with 25 imputed datasets were created and estimates were pooled for the regression models for each outcome (ILD, age at SSc/SSc-ILD, ED visit, Hospitalization) using Rubin’s rules. ### Statistical Analyses We analyzed differences in patient characteristics between patients with ILD and those without using student T-test for continuous variables (after normality diagnostics, q-q plot visualization), Wilcoxon rank-sum test for continuous variables not normally distributed, and Fisher’s exact tests for categorical variables. Time distribution comparisons across groups in Ridgeline plots were conducted with the Kruskal-Wallis test. Multivariable linear or logistic regression assessed the association between age at SSc/SSc-ILD, and ILD outcome, using selected social drivers of health (SDOH: income, education, insurance, employment) and clinical covariates. Each ED visit and hospitalization were collapsed into the binary outcome of having at least 1 ED visit or hospitalization during the study period and used in the univariate and multivariable complimentary log-log binary regression models with the outcome as a rate. To account for varying person-time and follow-up, an offset of the log of patient-days was included. Sensitivity analyses were conducted 1) to assess associations in the restricted condition of using the ILD ICD-10 code sourced from the patient’s problem list (instead of any source), which could represent more clinician certainty and 2) to compare hospitalization rates for a pre-COVID-19 period (January 2016-February 2020), during-COVID-19 period (March 2020-June 2021), and overall study period. P-values, 2-sided, less than <0.05 were considered statistically significant, and 95% confidence interval were presented for proportions and regression analyses. Analyses were performed with R software (The R Foundation for Statistical Computing, version 4.2.2) using RStudio (version 2022.12.0+353). The study was approved by MGB Institutional Review Board 2021P001697. ## Results ### Demographic, Socioeconomic and Clinical Variables Of the 756 SSc patients, 632 were women (83.6%) and 124 men (16.4%). The cohort was predominantly White (n=607, 80.3%) with a mean age of 59.4 years old at SSc index date. The sociodemographic and clinical characteristics of the cohort, comparing those with and without ILD are shown in Table 1. View this table: [Table 1.](http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2024/02/03/2024.02.02.24302197/T1) Table 1. Comparison of baseline characteristics of patients with systemic sclerosis, with and without interstitial lung disease ICD-10 code (before or during study period) ### ILD Prevalence, and Race/Ethnicity Among the 756 patients, 501 (66.3%) did not have ILD and 255 (33.7%) had ILD before or during the study period (Table 1). Although there were many differences in organ involvement, laboratory values, and other clinical characteristics between SSc patients with and without ILD, race/ethnicity was the primary demographic characteristic that differed between groups (Table 1). Sensitivity analysis using a more restrictive case definition of ILD, demonstrated similar findings (Table E2). Unadjusted logistic regression models show Black/African American and Asian patients have increased odds of ILD (odds ratio [OR] 1.99, 95% confidence interval [95% CI 1.08, 3.64], p=0.027 and OR 2.53 [95% CI 1.29, 4.93], p=0.007, respectively). After adjusting for SDOH variables, there was a statistically significant association for Asian patients (OR 2.59, [95% CI 1.29, 5.18], p=0.007), (Table E3). Additionally, there was an increased odds of ILD for both Black/African American and Asian patients in unadjusted sensitivity analyses, which remained significant after adjusting for covariates (Table E3). The effects of other covariates associated with ILD risk are included in Table E4. Further investigation of the functional, clinical, and serological features of Black/African American and Asian patients with ILD is presented in Table E5. On average, from the first available pulmonary function test (PFT), Black/African American patients had restrictive defects (mean percent-predicted FVC at baseline 57% ± 17), with moderate diffusion limitation (mean percent-predicted DLCO at baseline 51% ± 14). Black/African American (n=8, 42%; vs n=5, 25%) and Asian (n=5, 45%; vs n=3, 27%) patients had more anti-RNP positivity than Scl-70. ### Time to ILD Diagnosis Comparable to differences in having ILD, the timing of an SSc diagnosis, and an ILD diagnosis differed by race/ethnicity; specifically, Black/African American patients were, on average, more likely to have an ILD diagnosis that preceded their SSc diagnosis (59.1%), in contrast to White patients with SSc of whom over 80% were diagnosed with ILD after SSc (p=0.001 for the difference between groups, TableE 6). Similarly, there were differences between racial/ethnic groups in the distribution of time between SSc and ILD diagnoses as shown in Figure 1 (p<0.001, for the difference between groups). For example, Black/African American patients had an ILD code a median of 2.5 months prior to SSc code, in contrast to all other groups of patients. Additionally, Black/African American patients had the shortest maximum time to ILD after SSc, at 3 months. White patients had the widest range of the SSc and ILD interval (maximum of 61 months), while Asian and Hispanic patients had similar maximum time at 44 and 56 months, respectively. ![Figure 1.](http://medrxiv.org/http://medrxiv.stage.highwire.org/content/medrxiv/early/2024/02/03/2024.02.02.24302197/F1.medium.gif) [Figure 1.](http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2024/02/03/2024.02.02.24302197/F1) Figure 1. Ridgeline plot of time interval (in months) between systemic sclerosis and interstitial lung disease diagnosis codes by race/ethnicity (unimputed, unknown race/ethnicity not shown). Negative time denotes ILD diagnosis prior to SSc diagnosis. Median in months shown by line for each race/ethnicity. Density plot illustrating distribution of time, not indicating raw data points except for median line. Range and median for each race/ethnicity: White (−166, 61, med = 0mo), Black/African American (−47, 3, med = −2.5mo), Asian (−36, 44, med= 0mo), Hispanic (−98, 56, med=0.5mo). SSc= systemic sclerosis. ILD = interstitial lung disease. Kruskal-Wallis p-value < 0.001 for differences in distribution. ### Age at SSc and SSc-ILD In addition to the racial/ethnic differences in the timing interval between SSc and ILD, there were significant differences in the age of both SSc and SSc-ILD between racial/ethnic groups. For the entire cohort, the observed average age at ILD diagnosis was 58.5 years; for White patients the average age was 61.5 years and for all non-White patient groups ranged from 46-52.9 years. In the multivariable regression analysis adjusting for SDOH, Black/African American and Hispanic patients were significantly younger for both SSc ([-]9.3 and [-]4.6 years, respectively) and SSc-ILD ([-]10 and [-]6.5 years, respectively) compared to White patients (Table 2). In contrast, the SSc and SSc-ILD age difference between Asian and White patients was substantially attenuated after adjustment (Table 2). The statistically significant younger age at SSc-ILD compared to White patients persisted for Black/African American patients in the sensitivity analysis using the restricted condition (Table E7). View this table: [Table 2.](http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2024/02/03/2024.02.02.24302197/T2) Table 2. Adjusted mean age difference for age at systemic sclerosis ICD-10 code and systemic sclerosis-interstitial lung disease ICD-10 code, among Black/African American, Asian or Hispanic patients compared to White patients ### Emergency Department Visit and Hospitalization The mean follow-up time in years by racial/ethnic group was 2.8, 2.6, 3.0, 3.0 for White, Black/African American, Asian, and Hispanic patients respectively. During the study period, 279 (36.9%) patients had at least 1 ED visit, with 990 total visits during the study period. There were 256 patients (33.9%) with at least 1 hospitalization, and 145 (19.2%) had multiple hospitalizations (with 725 total hospitalizations during the study period). By racial/ethnic group, the observed mean number of ED visits and hospitalizations over 3 years average follow-up is shown in Table E8. Black/African American, and Hispanic patients had over 2-fold increased rate (and approximately 2 for Asian patients) of an ED visit, compared to White patients, even after adjustment for SDOH and clinical variables (Table 3). Notably, patients with ILD had a 60% increased rate of a hospitalization compared to those without ILD (Table E4). Sensitivity analyses examined the possible impact of COVID-19 on hospitalizations, comparing pre and during-COVID-19 periods (Table E9), demonstrating increased rates among non-White patients during the COVID period. View this table: [Table 3.](http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2024/02/03/2024.02.02.24302197/T3) Table 3. Regression models of race/ethnicity associations with healthcare utilization outcomes: any emergency department visit, any all-cause hospitalization in imputed data ## Discussion We found important race/ethnicity differences in the presentation and risk of ILD, its timing with respect to an SSc diagnosis, and important clinical outcomes in a relatively large SSc cohort from a multi-hospital health system. More specifically, in contrast to White patients with SSc, Black/African American patients with SSc were more likely to have ILD, to present at a younger age, to have ILD that precedes a diagnosis of SSc, and to have increased rate of an ED visit. Some, but not all these differences, were noted when comparing Asian and Hispanic patients to White patients with SSc. Additionally, given that Black/African American patients frequently present with ILD preceding a SSc diagnosis, these findings have important implications for general ILD evaluation. These findings suggest that race/ethnicity are important factors to consider in the risk of ILD, and its severity among patients with SSc; extending previously published work by demonstrating that timing of evaluation for minoritized patients is critical. Other SSc cohorts have had similar demographic findings,25,26 and we also found established associations such as GERD with SSc-ILD,27 and ILD or PHTN with a hospitalization28–30 were demonstrated in this cohort. Although our findings, and those of others, demonstrate that race/ethnicity are important factors associated with presentation and severity of ILD among SSc patients,8,10,31 the reasons for this are not clear. We investigated some of the racial/ethnic variability in presentation and outcomes and present novel findings to better understand these differences. Race is an evolving and poorly defined social construct32,33 that impacts health through various mechanisms. Thus, what is captured as differential population distributions of SSc and SSc-ILD is likely a combination of diverse SDOH34 and other factors that may correlate with race. Compared to other racial/ethnic groups, Black/African American patients were younger at ILD diagnosis,11,35,36 however, there is paucity of data on multi racial/ethnic group comparisons of age at SSc-ILD. We found that compared to White patients, Hispanic and Black/African American patients had significantly younger age at SSc and SSc-ILD diagnosis of 4 to 9 years and 6 to 10 years respectively. Additionally, compared to other groups, more Black/African American patients had ILD prior to SSc, with a very narrow interval between the two diagnoses. The attenuation of age differences between groups by available SDOH data suggests they could explain some of the SSc-ILD age heterogeneity but there may be other relevant exposures or unmeasured factors (eg environmental or genetic) that may explain differences in susceptibility, severity, or phenotypes. Multi-racial/ethnic group differences in adjusted SSc-ILD age have not previously been reported, and may be informative in risk-stratification. The short interval (3 months) between an SSc and an ILD diagnosis for Black/African American patients, coupled with the risk of SSc-ILD earlier in SSc course37 supports consideration of earlier pulmonary evaluation; additionally, a higher level of suspicion for SSc in young non-White patients with ILD could be beneficial. These considerations have management and therapeutic implications.16 Given significant lung function decline is shown to occur insidiously and earlier in SSc course,38 risk stratification and establishing baseline disease severity is important to preserve lung function before irreversible lung damage occurs.39 Among the Black/African American patients with available baseline FVC measurement, most were nonsmokers and had moderately severe RLD, which may suggest a more severe phenotype at presentation, aligning with data from prior studies. The baseline FVC and DLCO percentage predicted are similar to baseline values in other cohorts,40,41 and non-White patients have been shown to have increased odds of RLD at baseline.42 Black and Asian patients have been shown to have lower FVC compared to White patients,31 and in one study, African Americans had more extensive ILD at baseline and faster rate of FVC decline compared to other participants.11 Our lung function findings, along with other studies suggest clinical importance of obtaining physiological data earlier, and possibly more frequently. Autoantibodies and environmental exposures43,44 could partially explain the variation of SSc-ILD presentation and trajectory. Among African American and Hispanic patients with similar sociodemographic parameters in previous studies, Hispanic patients had higher DLCO, less fibrosis and lower frequency of PAH.12 Black/African American patients have been shown to have higher levels of both anti-ribonucleoprotein (U1-RNP) and antifibrillin antibodies (U3-RNP) compared to non-Black patients with SSc,45–47 a higher proportion of Asian patients compared to White patients have anti-U1-RNP positivity,10 and more severe fibrosis is associated with anti–U1 RNP–positivity.9 Among African American patients with scleroderma in the Genome Research in African American Scleroderma Patients (GRASP) cohort, 14-18% were positive for anti-RNPs and 20% had a concomitant overlapping autoimmune disease.41 For the subset of Black/African American and Asian patients with ILD in this cohort with testing, over 40% had anti-RNP positivity, most of whom also had additional autoimmune disease considerations. The pathophysiology of autoantibodies and compounded risk from overlapping diseases remains incompletely understood. Regarding possible environmental contributions, in another SSc cohort, overlaying environmental toxin maps in Massachusetts showed hazardous waste and oil disposal sites were significantly associated with higher SSc prevalence, with clustering around neighborhoods with low-income and minority inhabitants.48 Additionally, observational studies suggest an association between annual ozone concentration and extensive SSc-ILD imaging severity at diagnosis.49 Taken together, it is possible that expanding serological testing, evaluation of environmental factors, and consideration of SSc/SSc-ILD in specific populations, could inform risk assessment and management. In our study, adjusted analyses show racial/ethnic differences exist in prevalence of ILD and rate of ED visit but not consistently with hospitalization. The limited data on SSc racial/ethnic differences in ED visits and hospitalizations demonstrate increased rates among Black/African American patients compared to White,18–20 and pulmonary fibrosis as the condition associated with the highest chance of in-hospital mortality.20 Our multi-racial/ethnic analyses expand on differences in ED visits, demonstrating increased significant rates for Black/African American, Hispanic, and Asian patients. Several explanations for increased rates for subpopulations are possible: differences in extent of SSc manifestations independent of adjusted conditions (such as SSc-ILD), contributing comorbidities not fully captured by Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI), or healthcare delivery (differences in ambulatory/subspeciality access or care coordination throughout health-systems). There was a trend for increased overall and COVID-19 period hospitalization rates for Black/African American patients (which has been noted in PF in general36); overall, differences in hospitalization may not have been observed due to sample size, low acuity of ED visit leading to hospitalization, random effects such as care transition (ie, transfer to another hospital for admission) or other features not captured. Inaccessible or dissimilar care has been described as a potential explanation for racial/ethnic differences in SSc overall. Longitudinal cohort studies13 and clinical trials,11 where comparable access and management is more likely, suggest that some endpoint disparities may be minimized under these conditions. However, race/ethnicity and socio-economic status data have not been reported in most SSc randomized trial publications,50 and there are other unmeasured contributing factors that can aid in comprehensively studying disparities. Reducing disparities has important clinical implications, fully examining the burden of SSc-ILD in clinical practice provides expanded care opportunities, which future EHR studies can facilitate. This study has several limitations. One common limitation in secondary data analyses, the true duration of disease (or date from first non-Raynaud symptom) cannot be measured with certainty, which is why we used first-time use of the ICD-10 code as a proxy for “index” disease date. Code misclassification is another known limitation in EHR and claims data,51 however, similar findings were demonstrated in the restricted sensitivity analyses based on a clinician adding ILD to the problem list, albeit there are overall limitations of ILD coding.17,52 Conversely, patients that may have ILD may not have been captured, either due to lack of evaluation or coding for ILD. Disease activity, characteristics of SSc (ie, subtype), medication use (timing of initiation and treatment response), cause of ED visit or hospitalization and other information that may further explain some of these findings are unknown, however we included a wide number of available SDOH data in this study. Local and geographical differences between patients is not available, and this is a multihospital single health system study which may not be broadly generalizable, further validation in other health systems is necessary. There may be variability in PFT reference equation calculation, and race/ethnicity is self-reported therefore confirming accuracy in chart documentation is limited. As some were not available in our system, CT images were not independently reviewed. ### Conclusions In this study, we confirmed known associations with SSc-ILD, and add information on racial/ethnic differences in age and timing of diagnosis of SSc-ILD, particularly that non-White patient groups were younger. More Black/African American patients were diagnosed with SSc-ILD before SSc and at a younger age, and at baseline, had diminished lung function, with more anti-RNP positivity than Scl-70 positivity. Additionally, non-White patients had increased rates of an ED visit. Multiple factors may drive differential disease timing and outcomes in non-White patient groups, and further investigation is warranted. ILD is an early manifestation and leading cause of death in SSc, and earlier identification is critical for improving outcomes. ## Supporting information Supplemental File [[supplements/302197_file02.pdf]](pending:yes) ## Data Availability Data is not currently publicly available but may be available upon reasonable request to the authors. ## Additional information The e-Tables are available online under “Supplementary Data.” ## Acknowledgements The authors thank Drs. John E. Orav and Stuart Lipsitz for their expertise. This work was conducted with support from Harvard Catalyst | The Harvard Clinical and Translational Science Center (National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences, National Institutes of Health Award UL1 TR002541) and financial contributions from Harvard University and its affiliated academic healthcare centers. The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of Harvard Catalyst, Harvard University and its affiliated academic healthcare centers, or the National Institutes of Health. ## Footnotes * Funding: AMCT, JAR are supported by T32-HL0007633. GMH is supported by R01 HL111024, R01 HL130974, and R01 HL135142. The funder had no role in study design, data analysis, data interpretation nor writing of the manuscript. * Received February 2, 2024. * Revision received February 2, 2024. * Accepted February 3, 2024. * © 2024, Posted by Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory The copyright holder for this pre-print is the author. All rights reserved. The material may not be redistributed, re-used or adapted without the author's permission. ## References 1. 1.Tyndall AJ, Bannert B, Vonk M, et al. Causes and risk factors for death in systemic sclerosis: a study from the EULAR Scleroderma Trials and Research (EUSTAR) database. Ann Rheum Dis. Oct 2010;69(10):1809–15. doi:10.1136/ard.2009.114264 [Abstract/FREE Full Text](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/ijlink/YTozOntzOjQ6InBhdGgiO3M6MTQ6Ii9sb29rdXAvaWpsaW5rIjtzOjU6InF1ZXJ5IjthOjQ6e3M6ODoibGlua1R5cGUiO3M6NDoiQUJTVCI7czoxMToiam91cm5hbENvZGUiO3M6MTE6ImFubnJoZXVtZGlzIjtzOjU6InJlc2lkIjtzOjEwOiI2OS8xMC8xODA5IjtzOjQ6ImF0b20iO3M6NTA6Ii9tZWRyeGl2L2Vhcmx5LzIwMjQvMDIvMDMvMjAyNC4wMi4wMi4yNDMwMjE5Ny5hdG9tIjt9czo4OiJmcmFnbWVudCI7czowOiIiO30=) 2. 2.Steen VD, Medsger TA. Changes in causes of death in systemic sclerosis, 1972-2002. Ann Rheum Dis. Jul 2007;66(7):940–4. doi:10.1136/ard.2006.066068 [Abstract/FREE Full Text](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/ijlink/YTozOntzOjQ6InBhdGgiO3M6MTQ6Ii9sb29rdXAvaWpsaW5rIjtzOjU6InF1ZXJ5IjthOjQ6e3M6ODoibGlua1R5cGUiO3M6NDoiQUJTVCI7czoxMToiam91cm5hbENvZGUiO3M6MTE6ImFubnJoZXVtZGlzIjtzOjU6InJlc2lkIjtzOjg6IjY2LzcvOTQwIjtzOjQ6ImF0b20iO3M6NTA6Ii9tZWRyeGl2L2Vhcmx5LzIwMjQvMDIvMDMvMjAyNC4wMi4wMi4yNDMwMjE5Ny5hdG9tIjt9czo4OiJmcmFnbWVudCI7czowOiIiO30=) 3. 3.Hoffmann-Vold AM, Allanore Y, Alves M, et al. Progressive interstitial lung disease in patients with systemic sclerosis-associated interstitial lung disease in the EUSTAR database. Ann Rheum Dis. Feb 2021;80(2):219–227. doi:10.1136/annrheumdis-2020-217455 [Abstract/FREE Full Text](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/ijlink/YTozOntzOjQ6InBhdGgiO3M6MTQ6Ii9sb29rdXAvaWpsaW5rIjtzOjU6InF1ZXJ5IjthOjQ6e3M6ODoibGlua1R5cGUiO3M6NDoiQUJTVCI7czoxMToiam91cm5hbENvZGUiO3M6MTE6ImFubnJoZXVtZGlzIjtzOjU6InJlc2lkIjtzOjg6IjgwLzIvMjE5IjtzOjQ6ImF0b20iO3M6NTA6Ii9tZWRyeGl2L2Vhcmx5LzIwMjQvMDIvMDMvMjAyNC4wMi4wMi4yNDMwMjE5Ny5hdG9tIjt9czo4OiJmcmFnbWVudCI7czowOiIiO30=) 4. 4.Steen VD, Conte C, Owens GR, Medsger TA. Severe restrictive lung disease in systemic sclerosis. Arthritis Rheum. Sep 1994;37(9):1283–9. doi:10.1002/art.1780370903 [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1002/art.1780370903&link_type=DOI) [PubMed](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=7945490&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fmedrxiv%2Fearly%2F2024%2F02%2F03%2F2024.02.02.24302197.atom) [Web of Science](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=A1994PJ93800002&link_type=ISI) 5. 5.Bauer PR, Schiavo DN, Osborn TG, et al. Influence of interstitial lung disease on outcome in systemic sclerosis: a population-based historical cohort study. Chest. Aug 2013;144(2):571–577. doi:10.1378/chest.12-2768 [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1378/chest.12-2768&link_type=DOI) 6. 6.DeMizio DJ, Bernstein EJ. Detection and classification of systemic sclerosis-related interstitial lung disease: a review. Curr Opin Rheumatol. Nov 2019;31(6):553–560. doi:10.1097/BOR.0000000000000660 [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1097/BOR.0000000000000660&link_type=DOI) 7. 7.Hoffmann-Vold AM, Molberg Ø. Detection, screening, and classification of interstitial lung disease in patients with systemic sclerosis. Curr Opin Rheumatol. Nov 2020;32(6):497–504. doi:10.1097/BOR.0000000000000741 [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1097/BOR.0000000000000741&link_type=DOI) 8. 8.Mayes MD, Lacey JV, Beebe-Dimmer J, et al. Prevalence, incidence, survival, and disease characteristics of systemic sclerosis in a large US population. Arthritis Rheum. Aug 2003;48(8):2246–55. doi:10.1002/art.11073 [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1002/art.11073&link_type=DOI) [PubMed](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=12905479&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fmedrxiv%2Fearly%2F2024%2F02%2F03%2F2024.02.02.24302197.atom) [Web of Science](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=000184585000021&link_type=ISI) 9. 9.Steen V, Domsic RT, Lucas M, Fertig N, Medsger TA. A clinical and serologic comparison of African American and Caucasian patients with systemic sclerosis. Arthritis Rheum. Sep 2012;64(9):2986–94. doi:10.1002/art.34482 [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1002/art.34482&link_type=DOI) [PubMed](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=22576620&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fmedrxiv%2Fearly%2F2024%2F02%2F03%2F2024.02.02.24302197.atom) 10. 10.Chung MP, Dontsi M, Postlethwaite D, et al. Increased Mortality in Asians With Systemic Sclerosis in Northern California. ACR Open Rheumatol. Apr 2020;2(4):197–206. doi:10.1002/acr2.11126 [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1002/acr2.11126&link_type=DOI) 11. 11.Volkmann ER, Steen V, Li N, et al. Racial Disparities in Systemic Sclerosis: Short- and Long-Term Outcomes Among African American Participants of SLS I and II. ACR Open Rheumatol. Jan 2021;3(1):8–16. doi:10.1002/acr2.11206 [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1002/acr2.11206&link_type=DOI) 12. 12.McNearney TA, Reveille JD, Fischbach M, et al. Pulmonary involvement in systemic sclerosis: associations with genetic, serologic, sociodemographic, and behavioral factors. Arthritis Rheum. Mar 15 2007;57(2):318–26. doi:10.1002/art.22532 [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1002/art.22532&link_type=DOI) [PubMed](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=17330281&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fmedrxiv%2Fearly%2F2024%2F02%2F03%2F2024.02.02.24302197.atom) [Web of Science](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=000244881500020&link_type=ISI) 13. 13.Al-Sheikh H, Ahmad Z, Johnson SR. Ethnic Variations in Systemic Sclerosis Disease Manifestations, Internal Organ Involvement, and Mortality. J Rheumatol. Sep 2019;46(9):1103–1108. doi:10.3899/jrheum.180042 [Abstract/FREE Full Text](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/ijlink/YTozOntzOjQ6InBhdGgiO3M6MTQ6Ii9sb29rdXAvaWpsaW5rIjtzOjU6InF1ZXJ5IjthOjQ6e3M6ODoibGlua1R5cGUiO3M6NDoiQUJTVCI7czoxMToiam91cm5hbENvZGUiO3M6NjoianJoZXVtIjtzOjU6InJlc2lkIjtzOjk6IjQ2LzkvMTEwMyI7czo0OiJhdG9tIjtzOjUwOiIvbWVkcnhpdi9lYXJseS8yMDI0LzAyLzAzLzIwMjQuMDIuMDIuMjQzMDIxOTcuYXRvbSI7fXM6ODoiZnJhZ21lbnQiO3M6MDoiIjt9) 14. 14.Kassamali B, Kus KJB, Mazori DR, et al. Race and gender differences in systemic sclerosis: a retrospective multicenter cohort. Int J Dermatol. Nov 2022;61(11):e437–e438. doi:10.1111/ijd.15908 [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1111/ijd.15908&link_type=DOI) 15. 15.Greidinger EL, Flaherty KT, White B, Rosen A, Wigley FM, Wise RA. African-American race and antibodies to topoisomerase I are associated with increased severity of scleroderma lung disease. Chest. Sep 1998;114(3):801–7. doi:10.1378/chest.114.3.801 [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1378/chest.114.3.801&link_type=DOI) [PubMed](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=9743170&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fmedrxiv%2Fearly%2F2024%2F02%2F03%2F2024.02.02.24302197.atom) [Web of Science](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=000075898500028&link_type=ISI) 16. 16.Gelber AC, Manno RL, Shah AA, et al. Race and association with disease manifestations and mortality in scleroderma: a 20-year experience at the Johns Hopkins Scleroderma Center and review of the literature. Medicine (Baltimore). Jul 2013;92(4):191–205. doi:10.1097/MD.0b013e31829be125 [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1097/MD.0b013e31829be125&link_type=DOI) [PubMed](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=http://www.n&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fmedrxiv%2Fearly%2F2024%2F02%2F03%2F2024.02.02.24302197.atom) 17. 17.Fischer A, Kong AM, Swigris JJ, Cole AL, Raimundo K. All-cause Healthcare Costs and Mortality in Patients with Systemic Sclerosis with Lung Involvement. J Rheumatol. Feb 2018;45(2):235–241. doi:10.3899/jrheum.170307 [Abstract/FREE Full Text](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/ijlink/YTozOntzOjQ6InBhdGgiO3M6MTQ6Ii9sb29rdXAvaWpsaW5rIjtzOjU6InF1ZXJ5IjthOjQ6e3M6ODoibGlua1R5cGUiO3M6NDoiQUJTVCI7czoxMToiam91cm5hbENvZGUiO3M6NjoianJoZXVtIjtzOjU6InJlc2lkIjtzOjg6IjQ1LzIvMjM1IjtzOjQ6ImF0b20iO3M6NTA6Ii9tZWRyeGl2L2Vhcmx5LzIwMjQvMDIvMDMvMjAyNC4wMi4wMi4yNDMwMjE5Ny5hdG9tIjt9czo4OiJmcmFnbWVudCI7czowOiIiO30=) 18. 18.Nietert PJ, Silver RM. Patterns of hospital admissions and emergency room visits among patients with scleroderma in South Carolina, USA. J Rheumatol. Jun 2003;30(6):1238–43. [Abstract/FREE Full Text](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/ijlink/YTozOntzOjQ6InBhdGgiO3M6MTQ6Ii9sb29rdXAvaWpsaW5rIjtzOjU6InF1ZXJ5IjthOjQ6e3M6ODoibGlua1R5cGUiO3M6NDoiQUJTVCI7czoxMToiam91cm5hbENvZGUiO3M6NjoianJoZXVtIjtzOjU6InJlc2lkIjtzOjk6IjMwLzYvMTIzOCI7czo0OiJhdG9tIjtzOjUwOiIvbWVkcnhpdi9lYXJseS8yMDI0LzAyLzAzLzIwMjQuMDIuMDIuMjQzMDIxOTcuYXRvbSI7fXM6ODoiZnJhZ21lbnQiO3M6MDoiIjt9) 19. 19.Nietert PJ, Silverstein MD, Silver RM. Hospital admissions, length of stay, charges, and in-hospital death among patients with systemic sclerosis. J Rheumatol. Sep 2001;28(9):2031–7. [Abstract/FREE Full Text](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/ijlink/YTozOntzOjQ6InBhdGgiO3M6MTQ6Ii9sb29rdXAvaWpsaW5rIjtzOjU6InF1ZXJ5IjthOjQ6e3M6ODoibGlua1R5cGUiO3M6NDoiQUJTVCI7czoxMToiam91cm5hbENvZGUiO3M6NjoianJoZXVtIjtzOjU6InJlc2lkIjtzOjk6IjI4LzkvMjAzMSI7czo0OiJhdG9tIjtzOjUwOiIvbWVkcnhpdi9lYXJseS8yMDI0LzAyLzAzLzIwMjQuMDIuMDIuMjQzMDIxOTcuYXRvbSI7fXM6ODoiZnJhZ21lbnQiO3M6MDoiIjt9) 20. 20.Chung L, Krishnan E, Chakravarty EF. Hospitalizations and mortality in systemic sclerosis: results from the Nationwide Inpatient Sample. Rheumatology (Oxford). Dec 2007;46(12):1808–13. doi:10.1093/rheumatology/kem273 [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1093/rheumatology/kem273&link_type=DOI) [PubMed](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=17986481&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fmedrxiv%2Fearly%2F2024%2F02%2F03%2F2024.02.02.24302197.atom) [Web of Science](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=000251197900014&link_type=ISI) 21. 21. Ram Poudel D, George M, Dhital R, Karmacharya P, Sandorfi N, Derk CT. Mortality, length of stay and cost of hospitalization among patients with systemic sclerosis: results from the National Inpatient Sample. Rheumatology (Oxford). Sep 01 2018;57(9):1611–1622. doi:10.1093/rheumatology/key150 [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1093/rheumatology/key150&link_type=DOI) 22. 22.Tukpah AC, Rose JA, Seger DL, Dellaripa PF, Hunninghake GM, Bates DW. Development and validation of algorithms to build an electronic health record based cohort of patients with systemic sclerosis. PLoS One. 2023;18(4):e0283775. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0283775 [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1371/journal.pone.0283775&link_type=DOI) 23. 23.van Buuren S, & Groothuis-Oudshoorn, K. mice: Multivariate Imputation by Chained Equations in R. Journal of Statistical Software. 2011;45 (3): 1–67. 24. 24.Bellou V, Belbasis L, Evangelou E. Tobacco Smoking and Risk for Pulmonary Fibrosis: A Prospective Cohort Study From the UK Biobank. Chest. Sep 2021;160(3):983–993. doi:10.1016/j.chest.2021.04.035 [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1016/j.chest.2021.04.035&link_type=DOI) 25. 25.Jamian L, Wheless L, Crofford LJ, Barnado A. Rule-based and machine learning algorithms identify patients with systemic sclerosis accurately in the electronic health record. Arthritis Res Ther. Dec 30 2019;21(1):305. doi:10.1186/s13075-019-2092-7 [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1186/s13075-019-2092-7&link_type=DOI) 26. 26.Hoffmann-Vold AM, Fretheim H, Halse AK, et al. Tracking Impact of Interstitial Lung Disease in Systemic Sclerosis in a Complete Nationwide Cohort. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. Nov 15 2019;200(10):1258–1266. doi:10.1164/rccm.201903-0486OC [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1164/rccm.201903-0486OC&link_type=DOI) [PubMed](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=http://www.n&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fmedrxiv%2Fearly%2F2024%2F02%2F03%2F2024.02.02.24302197.atom) 27. 27.Kreuter M, Bonella F, Blank N, et al. Anti-acid therapy in SSc-associated interstitial lung disease: long-term outcomes from the German Network for Systemic Sclerosis. Rheumatology (Oxford). Jan 27 2023;doi:10.1093/rheumatology/kead023 [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1093/rheumatology/kead023&link_type=DOI) 28. 28.Zhou Z, Fan Y, Thomason D, et al. Economic Burden of Illness Among Commercially Insured Patients with Systemic Sclerosis with Interstitial Lung Disease in the USA: A Claims Data Analysis. Adv Ther. May 2019;36(5):1100–1113. doi:10.1007/s12325-019-00929-2 [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1007/s12325-019-00929-2&link_type=DOI) 29. 29.Showalter K, Pinheiro LC, Jannat-Khah D, et al. Hospital readmission in systemic sclerosis associated pulmonary hypertension: Results from the PHAROS registry. Rheumatology (Oxford). Apr 11 2022;61(4):1510–1517. doi:10.1093/rheumatology/keab569 [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1093/rheumatology/keab569&link_type=DOI) 30. 30.Sankar S, Habib M, Jaafar S, et al. Hospitalisations related to systemic sclerosis and the impact of interstitial lung disease. Analysis of patients hospitalised at the University of Michigan, USA. Clin Exp Rheumatol. 2021;39 Suppl 131(4):43–51. doi:10.55563/clinexprheumatol/9ivp9g [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.55563/clinexprheumatol/9ivp9g&link_type=DOI) 31. 31.Jaeger VK, Tikly M, Xu D, et al. Racial differences in systemic sclerosis disease presentation: a European Scleroderma Trials and Research group study. Rheumatology (Oxford). Jul 01 2020;59(7):1684–1694. doi:10.1093/rheumatology/kez486 [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1093/rheumatology/kez486&link_type=DOI) 32. 32.Moore DF, Steen VD. Overall mortality. J Scleroderma Relat Disord. Feb 2021;6(1):3-10. doi:10.1177/2397198320924873 [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1177/2397198320924873&link_type=DOI) 33. 33.Howe CJ, Bailey ZD, Raifman JR, Jackson JW. Recommendations for Using Causal Diagrams to Study Racial Health Disparities. Am J Epidemiol. Nov 19 2022;191(12):1981–1989. doi:10.1093/aje/kwac140 [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1093/aje/kwac140&link_type=DOI) 34. 34.Moore DF, Steen VD. Racial Disparities in Systemic Sclerosis. Rheum Dis Clin North Am. Nov 2020;46(4):705–712. doi:10.1016/j.rdc.2020.07.009 [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1016/j.rdc.2020.07.009&link_type=DOI) 35. 35.Adegunsoye A, Oldham JM, Bellam SK, et al. African-American race and mortality in interstitial lung disease: a multicentre propensity-matched analysis. Eur Respir J. Jun 2018;51(6)doi:10.1183/13993003.00255-2018 [Abstract/FREE Full Text](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/ijlink/YTozOntzOjQ6InBhdGgiO3M6MTQ6Ii9sb29rdXAvaWpsaW5rIjtzOjU6InF1ZXJ5IjthOjQ6e3M6ODoibGlua1R5cGUiO3M6NDoiQUJTVCI7czoxMToiam91cm5hbENvZGUiO3M6MzoiZXJqIjtzOjU6InJlc2lkIjtzOjEyOiI1MS82LzE4MDAyNTUiO3M6NDoiYXRvbSI7czo1MDoiL21lZHJ4aXYvZWFybHkvMjAyNC8wMi8wMy8yMDI0LjAyLjAyLjI0MzAyMTk3LmF0b20iO31zOjg6ImZyYWdtZW50IjtzOjA6IiI7fQ==) 36. 36.Adegunsoye A, Freiheit E, White EN, et al. Evaluation of Pulmonary Fibrosis Outcomes by Race and Ethnicity in US Adults. JAMA Netw Open. Mar 01 2023;6(3):e232427. doi:10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.2427 [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.2427&link_type=DOI) 37. 37.Cottin V, Brown KK. Interstitial lung disease associated with systemic sclerosis (SSc-ILD). Respir Res. Jan 18 2019;20(1):13. doi:10.1186/s12931-019-0980-7 [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1186/s12931-019-0980-7&link_type=DOI) [PubMed](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=http://www.n&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fmedrxiv%2Fearly%2F2024%2F02%2F03%2F2024.02.02.24302197.atom) 38. 38.Fischer A, Patel NM, Volkmann ER. Interstitial Lung Disease in Systemic Sclerosis: Focus on Early Detection and Intervention. Open Access Rheumatol. 2019;11:283–307. doi:10.2147/OARRR.S226695 [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.2147/OARRR.S226695&link_type=DOI) [PubMed](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=http://www.n&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fmedrxiv%2Fearly%2F2024%2F02%2F03%2F2024.02.02.24302197.atom) 39. 39.Assassi S, Sharif R, Lasky RE, et al. Predictors of interstitial lung disease in early systemic sclerosis: a prospective longitudinal study of the GENISOS cohort. Arthritis Res Ther. 2010;12(5):R166. doi:10.1186/ar3125 [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1186/ar3125&link_type=DOI) [PubMed](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=20813056&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fmedrxiv%2Fearly%2F2024%2F02%2F03%2F2024.02.02.24302197.atom) 40. 40.Moore DF, Kramer E, Eltaraboulsi R, Steen VD. Increased Morbidity and Mortality of Scleroderma in African Americans Compared to Non-African Americans. Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken). Sep 2019;71(9):1154–1163. doi:10.1002/acr.23861 [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1002/acr.23861&link_type=DOI) 41. 41.Morgan ND, Shah AA, Mayes MD, et al. Clinical and serological features of systemic sclerosis in a multicenter African American cohort: Analysis of the genome research in African American scleroderma patients clinical database. Medicine (Baltimore). Dec 2017;96(51):e8980. doi:10.1097/MD.0000000000008980 [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1097/MD.0000000000008980&link_type=DOI) 42. 42.Castelino FV, VanBuren JM, Startup E, et al. Baseline characteristics of systemic sclerosis patients with restrictive lung disease in a multi-center US-based longitudinal registry. Int J Rheum Dis. Feb 2022;25(2):163–174. doi:10.1111/1756-185X.14253 [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1111/1756-185X.14253&link_type=DOI) 43. 43.Marie I. Systemic sclerosis and exposure to heavy metals. Autoimmun Rev. Jan 2019;18(1):62–72. doi:10.1016/j.autrev.2018.11.001 [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1016/j.autrev.2018.11.001&link_type=DOI) 44. 44.Mora GF. Systemic sclerosis: environmental factors. J Rheumatol. 2009;Nov;36(11):2383–96. [Abstract/FREE Full Text](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/ijlink/YTozOntzOjQ6InBhdGgiO3M6MTQ6Ii9sb29rdXAvaWpsaW5rIjtzOjU6InF1ZXJ5IjthOjQ6e3M6ODoibGlua1R5cGUiO3M6NDoiQUJTVCI7czoxMToiam91cm5hbENvZGUiO3M6NjoianJoZXVtIjtzOjU6InJlc2lkIjtzOjEwOiIzNi8xMS8yMzgzIjtzOjQ6ImF0b20iO3M6NTA6Ii9tZWRyeGl2L2Vhcmx5LzIwMjQvMDIvMDMvMjAyNC4wMi4wMi4yNDMwMjE5Ny5hdG9tIjt9czo4OiJmcmFnbWVudCI7czowOiIiO30=) 45. 45.Reveille JD. Ethnicity and race and systemic sclerosis: how it affects susceptibility, severity, antibody genetics, and clinical manifestations. Curr Rheumatol Rep. Apr 2003;5(2):160–7. doi:10.1007/s11926-003-0045-1 [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1007/s11926-003-0045-1&link_type=DOI) [PubMed](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=12628048&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fmedrxiv%2Fearly%2F2024%2F02%2F03%2F2024.02.02.24302197.atom) 46. 46.Aggarwal R, Lucas M, Fertig N, Oddis CV, Medsger TA. Anti-U3 RNP autoantibodies in systemic sclerosis. Arthritis Rheum. Apr 2009;60(4):1112–8. doi:10.1002/art.24409 [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1002/art.24409&link_type=DOI) [PubMed](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=19333934&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fmedrxiv%2Fearly%2F2024%2F02%2F03%2F2024.02.02.24302197.atom) [Web of Science](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=000265152800025&link_type=ISI) 47. 47.Steelandt A, Benmostefa N, Avouac J, Mouthon L, Allanore Y. Ethnic influence on the phenotype of French patients with systemic sclerosis. Joint Bone Spine. Mar 2021;88(2):105081. doi:10.1016/j.jbspin.2020.09.013 [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1016/j.jbspin.2020.09.013&link_type=DOI) 48. 48.Kassamali B, Kassamali AA, Muntyanu A, Netchiporouk E, Vleugels RA, LaChance A. Geographic distribution and environmental triggers of systemic sclerosis cases from 2 large academic tertiary centers in Massachusetts. J Am Acad Dermatol. Apr 2022;86(4):925–927. doi:10.1016/j.jaad.2021.03.055 [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1016/j.jaad.2021.03.055&link_type=DOI) 49. 49.Roeser A, Sese L, Chassagnon G, et al. The association between air pollution and the severity at diagnosis and progression of systemic sclerosis-associated interstitial lung disease: results from the retrospective ScleroPol study. Respir Res. Jun 08 2023;24(1):151. doi:10.1186/s12931-023-02463-w [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1186/s12931-023-02463-w&link_type=DOI) 50. 50.Chaix E, Mongin D, Gabay C, Iudici M. Reporting and Representativeness of Race, Ethnicity, and Socioeconomic Status in Systemic Sclerosis Randomized Trials: An Observational Study. Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken). Nov 10 2022;doi:10.1002/acr.25059 [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1002/acr.25059&link_type=DOI) 51. 51.Bime C, Poongkunran C, Borgstrom M, et al. Racial Differences in Mortality from Severe Acute Respiratory Failure in the United States, 2008-2012. Ann Am Thorac Soc. Dec 2016;13(12):2184–2189. doi:10.1513/AnnalsATS.201605-359OC [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1513/AnnalsATS.201605-359OC&link_type=DOI) 52. 52.Ley B, Urbania T, Husson G, et al. Code-based Diagnostic Algorithms for Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis. Case Validation and Improvement. Ann Am Thorac Soc. Jun 2017;14(6):880–887. doi:10.1513/AnnalsATS.201610-764OC [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1513/AnnalsATS.201610-764OC&link_type=DOI)