Skip to main content
medRxiv
  • Home
  • About
  • Submit
  • ALERTS / RSS
Advanced Search

“Holy cow, where do I sign up?” Attitudes of Military Veterans toward Epigenomic Biomarker Toxic Exposure Testing

View ORCID ProfileStacey Pereira, Calvin Apodaca, Kyle Slominski, Rachele K. Lipsky, Cristian Coarfa, Cheryl L. Walker, Amy L. McGuire, Lea Steele, Drew A. Helmer
doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.04.09.24305554
Stacey Pereira
1Center for Medical Ethics and Health Policy, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Stacey Pereira
  • For correspondence: spereira{at}bcm.edu
Calvin Apodaca
2Michael E. DeBakey VA Medical Center, Houston, TX, USA
3Department of Medicine, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Kyle Slominski
1Center for Medical Ethics and Health Policy, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Rachele K. Lipsky
2Michael E. DeBakey VA Medical Center, Houston, TX, USA
4Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, USA
5Duke University School of Nursing, Durham, NC
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Cristian Coarfa
6Gulf Coast Center for Precision Environmental Health, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, USA
7Department of Molecular and Cellular Biology, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Cheryl L. Walker
6Gulf Coast Center for Precision Environmental Health, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, USA
7Department of Molecular and Cellular Biology, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Amy L. McGuire
1Center for Medical Ethics and Health Policy, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Lea Steele
4Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, USA
6Gulf Coast Center for Precision Environmental Health, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Drew A. Helmer
1Center for Medical Ethics and Health Policy, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, USA
2Michael E. DeBakey VA Medical Center, Houston, TX, USA
3Department of Medicine, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, USA
6Gulf Coast Center for Precision Environmental Health, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Abstract
  • Full Text
  • Info/History
  • Metrics
  • Data/Code
  • Preview PDF
Loading

Abstract

Background With the signing of the PACT Act in 2022, there is great interest and investment in studying toxic exposures encountered during military service. One way to address this is through the identification of epigenomic biomarkers associated with exposures. There is increasing evidence suggesting that exposure to toxic substances may result in alterations to DNA methylation and resultant gene expression. These epigenomic changes may lead to adverse health effects for exposed individuals and their offspring. While the development of epigenomic biomarkers for exposures could facilitate understanding of these exposure-related health effects, such testing could also provide unwanted information.

Objectives Explore Veterans’ attitudes toward epigenomic biomarker research and the potential to test for past exposures that could pose intergenerational risk.

Methods Semi-structured interviews with Veterans (n=22) who experienced potentially harmful exposures during their military service.

Results Twenty Veterans said they would hypothetically want to receive epigenomic information related to their toxic exposures and potential health impacts as part of a research study. Veterans identified nine potential benefits of this research, including promoting insights concerning intergenerational health, identification of early health interventions to mitigate the impact of exposures, and additional knowledge or explanation for their experiences. At the same time, 16 participants noted potential risks, including psychological distress in response to results, concerns about receiving non-actionable, uncertain, or inaccurate results, and issues related to privacy and discrimination. Ten participants also identified at least one condition in their children that they thought could be related to their exposure and most said they would be interested in receiving research results related to their children’s and grandchildren’s risk of developing a health condition associated with their exposure.

Discussion Results suggest that Veterans might welcome benefits of epigenomic research related to military exposures yet have some concerns about potential negative impacts.

Competing Interest Statement

The authors have declared no competing interest.

Funding Statement

Funding for this research was provided by the Gulf Coast Center for Precision Environmental Health (NIH P30 ES030285) through a National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences Center Pilot Project grant. This research was also supported in part by the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, Veterans Health Administration, Health Services Research and Development Services at the Center for Innovations in Quality, Effectiveness and Safety (IQuESt; CIN 13-413), Michael E. DeBakey VA Medical Center, Houston, TX.

Author Declarations

I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.

Yes

The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:

The IRB of Baylor College of Medicine gave ethical approval for this work.

I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.

Yes

I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).

Yes

I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.

Yes

Footnotes

  • Conflicts of Interest The authors declare they have nothing to disclose.

Data Availability

Aggregated qualitative data are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request in accordance with VA privacy requirements.

Copyright 
The copyright holder for this preprint is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. All rights reserved. No reuse allowed without permission.
Back to top
PreviousNext
Posted April 18, 2024.
Download PDF
Data/Code
Email

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word about medRxiv.

NOTE: Your email address is requested solely to identify you as the sender of this article.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
“Holy cow, where do I sign up?” Attitudes of Military Veterans toward Epigenomic Biomarker Toxic Exposure Testing
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from medRxiv
(Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from the medRxiv website.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Share
“Holy cow, where do I sign up?” Attitudes of Military Veterans toward Epigenomic Biomarker Toxic Exposure Testing
Stacey Pereira, Calvin Apodaca, Kyle Slominski, Rachele K. Lipsky, Cristian Coarfa, Cheryl L. Walker, Amy L. McGuire, Lea Steele, Drew A. Helmer
medRxiv 2024.04.09.24305554; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.04.09.24305554
Twitter logo Facebook logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
Citation Tools
“Holy cow, where do I sign up?” Attitudes of Military Veterans toward Epigenomic Biomarker Toxic Exposure Testing
Stacey Pereira, Calvin Apodaca, Kyle Slominski, Rachele K. Lipsky, Cristian Coarfa, Cheryl L. Walker, Amy L. McGuire, Lea Steele, Drew A. Helmer
medRxiv 2024.04.09.24305554; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.04.09.24305554

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Subject Area

  • Health Policy
Subject Areas
All Articles
  • Addiction Medicine (349)
  • Allergy and Immunology (668)
  • Allergy and Immunology (668)
  • Anesthesia (181)
  • Cardiovascular Medicine (2648)
  • Dentistry and Oral Medicine (316)
  • Dermatology (223)
  • Emergency Medicine (399)
  • Endocrinology (including Diabetes Mellitus and Metabolic Disease) (942)
  • Epidemiology (12228)
  • Forensic Medicine (10)
  • Gastroenterology (759)
  • Genetic and Genomic Medicine (4103)
  • Geriatric Medicine (387)
  • Health Economics (680)
  • Health Informatics (2657)
  • Health Policy (1005)
  • Health Systems and Quality Improvement (985)
  • Hematology (363)
  • HIV/AIDS (851)
  • Infectious Diseases (except HIV/AIDS) (13695)
  • Intensive Care and Critical Care Medicine (797)
  • Medical Education (399)
  • Medical Ethics (109)
  • Nephrology (436)
  • Neurology (3882)
  • Nursing (209)
  • Nutrition (577)
  • Obstetrics and Gynecology (739)
  • Occupational and Environmental Health (695)
  • Oncology (2030)
  • Ophthalmology (585)
  • Orthopedics (240)
  • Otolaryngology (306)
  • Pain Medicine (250)
  • Palliative Medicine (75)
  • Pathology (473)
  • Pediatrics (1115)
  • Pharmacology and Therapeutics (466)
  • Primary Care Research (452)
  • Psychiatry and Clinical Psychology (3432)
  • Public and Global Health (6527)
  • Radiology and Imaging (1403)
  • Rehabilitation Medicine and Physical Therapy (814)
  • Respiratory Medicine (871)
  • Rheumatology (409)
  • Sexual and Reproductive Health (410)
  • Sports Medicine (342)
  • Surgery (448)
  • Toxicology (53)
  • Transplantation (185)
  • Urology (165)