Abstract
Quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qPCR) offers a rapid, automated, and potentially on-site method for quantifying L. pneumophila in building potable water systems, complementing and potentially replacing traditional culture-based techniques. However, the application of qPCR in assessing human health risks is complicated by its tendency to overestimate such risks due to the detection of genomic copies that do not correspond to viable, infectious bacteria. This study examines the relationship between L. pneumophila measurements obtained via qPCR and culture-based methods, aiming to understand and establish qPCR-to-culture concentration ratios needed to inform associated health risks. We developed a Poisson lognormal ratio model and a random-effects meta-analysis to analyze variations in qPCR-to-culture ratios within and across sites. Our findings indicate these ratios typically vary from 1:1 to 100:1, with ratios close to 1:1 predicted at all sites. Consequently, adopting a default 1:1 conversion factor appears necessary as a cautious approach to convert qPCR concentrations to culturable concentrations for use in models of associated health risks, for example, through quantitative microbial risk assessment (QMRA) frameworks. Where this approach may be too conservative, targeted sampling and the applications of viability-qPCR could improve the accuracy of qPCR-based QMRA. Standardizing qPCR and culture-based methods and reporting site-specific environmental factors that affect the culturability of L. pneumophila would improve the understanding of the relationship between the two methods. The ratio model introduced here shifts us beyond simple correlation analyses, facilitating investigations of temporal and spatial heterogeneities in the relationship. This analysis is a step forward in the integration of QMRA and molecular biology, as the framework demonstrated here for L. pneumphila is applicable to other pathogens monitored in the environment.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
ES was funded by postdoctoral fellowships from the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (558161-2021) and the Fonds de Recherche du Quebec Nature et technologies (303866). Additional funding was provided by the Swiss Federal Food Safety and Veterinary Office (FSVO), the Federal Office of Public Health (FOPH) and the Federal Office of Energy (FOE), through the project LeCo (Legionella Control in Buildings; Aramis nr.: 4.20.01), as well as Eawag discretionary funding.
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.
Yes
Data Availability
All data produced are available online at: https://tinyurl.com/44tx6a5s
