Abstract
Quantitative total-body PET imaging of blood flow can be performed with freely diffusible flow radiotracers such as 15O-water and 11C-butanol, but their short half-lives necessitate close access to a cyclotron. Past efforts to measure blood flow with the widely available radiotracer 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) were limited to tissues with high 18F-FDG extraction fraction. In this study, we developed an early-dynamic 18F-FDG PET method with high temporal resolution kinetic modeling to assess total-body blood flow based on deriving the vascular transit time of 18F-FDG and conducted a pilot comparison study against a 11C-butanol reference.
Methods The first two minutes of dynamic PET scans were reconstructed at high temporal resolution (60×1 s, 30×2 s) to resolve the rapid passage of the radiotracer through blood vessels. In contrast to existing methods that use blood-to-tissue transport rate (K1) as a surrogate of blood flow, our method directly estimates blood flow using a distributed kinetic model (adiabatic approximation to the tissue homogeneity model; AATH). To validate our 18F-FDG measurements of blood flow against a flow radiotracer, we analyzed total-body dynamic PET images of six human participants scanned with both 18F-FDG and 11C-butanol. An additional thirty-four total-body dynamic 18F-FDG PET scans of healthy participants were analyzed for comparison against literature blood flow ranges. Regional blood flow was estimated across the body and total-body parametric imaging of blood flow was conducted for visual assessment. AATH and standard compartment model fitting was compared by the Akaike Information Criterion at different temporal resolutions.
Results 18F-FDG blood flow was in quantitative agreement with flow measured from 11C-butanol across same-subject regional measurements (Pearson R=0.955, p<0.001; linear regression y=0.973x–0.012), which was visually corroborated by total-body blood flow parametric imaging. Our method resolved a wide range of blood flow values across the body in broad agreement with literature ranges (e.g., healthy cohort average: 0.51±0.12 ml/min/cm3 in the cerebral cortex and 2.03±0.64 ml/min/cm3 in the lungs, respectively). High temporal resolution (1 to 2 s) was critical to enabling AATH modeling over standard compartment modeling.
Conclusions Total-body blood flow imaging was feasible using early-dynamic 18F-FDG PET with high-temporal resolution kinetic modeling. Combined with standard 18F-FDG PET methods, this method may enable efficient single-tracer flow-metabolism imaging, with numerous research and clinical applications in oncology, cardiovascular disease, pain medicine, and neuroscience.
Competing Interest Statement
The University of California, Davis has a research agreement and a revenue sharing agreement with United Imaging Healthcare. The other authors declare no competing interests.
Funding Statement
This work was supported in part by National Institutes of Health (NIH) grants R01 EB033435 and R61 AT012187. The image data of healthy subjects were acquired under the support of NIH R01 CA206187 and P30 CA093373.
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
The ethics committee and IRB of the University of California Davis gave ethical approval for this work under IRB numbers 1341792, 1714742, 1834390.
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.
Yes
Footnotes
Financial support: This work was supported in part by National Institutes of Health (NIH) grants R01 EB033435 and R61 AT012187. The image data of healthy participants were acquired under the support of NIH R01 CA206187 and P30 CA093373.
Data Availability
All data produced in the present study are available upon reasonable request to the authors.
