RT Journal Article
SR Electronic
T1 The HIV/STI Epidemic Potential of Dynamic Sexual Networks of Men Who Have Sex With Men in Atlanta and San Francisco
JF medRxiv
FD Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press
SP 2020.10.12.20211540
DO 10.1101/2020.10.12.20211540
A1 Anderson, Emeli J.
A1 Weiss, Kevin M.
A1 Morris, Martina M.
A1 Sanchez, Travis H.
A1 Prasad, Pragati
A1 Jenness, Samuel M.
YR 2020
UL http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2020/10/14/2020.10.12.20211540.abstract
AB Background The potential speed through which a pathogen may circulate in a network is a function of network connectivity. Network features like degree (number of ongoing partnerships) determine the cross-sectional network connectivity. The overall transmission potential of a pathogen involves connectivity over time, which can be measured using the forward reachable path (FRP). We modeled dynamic sexual networks of MSM in San Francisco and Atlanta to estimate the FRP as a predictor of HIV/STI epidemic potential.Methods We used exponential random graph models to obtain parameter estimates for each city’s sexual network and then simulated the complete networks over time. The FRP was estimated in each city overall and stratified by demographics.Results The overall mean and median FRPs were higher in San Francisco than in Atlanta, suggesting a greater epidemic potential for HIV and STIs in San Francisco. At one year, in both cities, the average FRP among casual partnerships was highest in the youngest age group and lowest in the oldest age group, contrasting with the cross-sectional network parameters we estimated, where the youngest age category had the lowest mean degree and the oldest age category had the highest mean degree.Conclusions The FRP results correspond to the observed STI epidemics but not HIV epidemics between the cities. In San Francisco, rates of HIV have been declining over the last few years, whereas they have been steady in Atlanta. The FRP by age group resulted in fundamentally different conclusions about connectivity in the network compared with the cross-sectional network measures.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Funding StatementThis work was supported by National Institutes of Health grants R21 MH112449 and R01 AI138783.Author DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:Emory University Institutional Review BoardAll necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.YesThe data is publicly available through GitHub https://github.com/EpiModel/ARTnetData