RT Journal Article
SR Electronic
T1 Prediction of autism spectrum disorder diagnosis using nonlinear measures of language-related EEG at 6 and 12 months
JF medRxiv
FD Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press
SP 2020.12.16.20248200
DO 10.1101/2020.12.16.20248200
A1 Peck, Fleming C.
A1 Gabard-Durnam, Laurel J.
A1 Wilkinson, Carol L.
A1 Bosl, William
A1 Tager-Flusberg, Helen
A1 Nelson, Charles A.
YR 2020
UL http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2020/12/18/2020.12.16.20248200.abstract
AB Early identification of autism spectrum disorder (ASD) provides an opportunity for early intervention and improved outcomes. Use of electroencephalography (EEG) in infants has shown promise in predicting later ASD diagnoses and in identifying neural mechanisms underlying the disorder. Given the high co-morbidity with language impairment in ASD, we and others have speculated that infants who are later diagnosed with ASD have altered language learning, including phoneme discrimination. Phoneme learning occurs rapidly within the first postnatal year, so altered neural substrates either during or after the first year may serve as early, accurate indicators of later autism diagnosis. Using longitudinal EEG data collected during a passive phoneme task in infants with high familial risk for ASD, we compared predictive accuracy at 6-months (during phoneme learning) versus 12-months (after phoneme learning). Samples at both ages were matched in size and diagnoses (n=14 with later ASD; n= 40 without ASD). Using Pearson correlation feature selection and support vector machine with radial basis function classifier, 100% predictive diagnostic accuracy was observed at both ages. However, predictive features selected at the two ages differed and came from different scalp locations. We also report that performance across multiple machine learning algorithms was highly variable and declined when the 12-month sample size and behavioral heterogeneity was increased. These results demonstrate that speech processing EEG measures can facilitate earlier identification of ASD but emphasize the need for age-specific predictive models with large sample sizes in order to develop clinically relevant classification algorithms.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Funding StatementSupport for this work was provided by: The National Institutes of Health (R01-DC010290 to HTF and CAN; R21 DC 08637 to HTF; 1T32MH112510 to CLW), Autism Speaks (1323 to HTF), Simons Foundation (137186 to CAN) and the Princeton Fifty Five Fund for Senior Thesis Research (FP).Author DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:IRB approval was obtained from Boston University and Boston Children's Hospital (X06-08-0374) prior to the start of the study.All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).Yes I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.YesPython and Jupyter Notebook scripts used for computation of nonlinear measures and machine learning analysis are available. The datasets analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.