RT Journal Article
SR Electronic
T1 Activities of Daily Living with Bionic Arm Improved by Combination Training and Latching Filter in Prosthesis Control Comparison
JF medRxiv
FD Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press
SP 2020.10.21.20217026
DO 10.1101/2020.10.21.20217026
A1 Paskett, Michael D.
A1 Brinton, Mark R.
A1 Hansen, Taylor C.
A1 George, Jacob A.
A1 Davis, Tyler S.
A1 Duncan, Christopher C.
A1 Clark, Gregory A.
YR 2020
UL http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2020/12/23/2020.10.21.20217026.abstract
AB Background Advanced prostheses can restore function and improve quality of life for individuals with amputations. Unfortunately, most commercial control strategies do not utilize the rich control information from residual nerves and musculature. Continuous decoders can provide more intuitive prosthesis control from multi-channel neural or electromyographic recordings. Three components influence continuous decoder performance: the data used to train the algorithm, the algorithm, and smoothing filters on the algorithm’s output. As individual groups often focus on a single decoder, very few studies compare different decoders using otherwise similar experimental conditions.Methods We completed a two-phase head-to-head comparison of 12 continuous decoders using activities of daily living. In phase one, we compared two training types and a smoothing filter with three algorithms (modified Kalman filter, multi-layer perceptron, and convolutional neural network) in a clothespin relocation task. We compared training types that included data with only individual digit and wrist movements vs. combination movements (e.g., simultaneous grasp and wrist flexion). We also compared raw vs. nonlinearly smoothed algorithm outputs. In phase two, we compared the three algorithms in fragile egg, zipping, pouring, and folding tasks using the combination training and smoothing found beneficial in phase one. In both phases, we collected objective, performance-based (e.g., success rate) and subjective, user-focused (e.g., preference) measures.Results Phase one showed that combination training improved prosthesis control accuracy and speed, and that the nonlinear smoothing improved accuracy but generally reduced speed. Phase one importantly showed simultaneous movements were used in the task, and that the modified Kalman filter and multi-layer perceptron predicted more simultaneous movements than the convolutional neural network. In phase two, user-focused metrics favored the convolutional neural network and modified Kalman filter, whereas performance-based metrics were generally similar among all algorithms.Conclusions These results confirm that state-of-the-art algorithms, whether linear or nonlinear in nature, functionally benefit from training on more complex data and from output smoothing. These studies will be used to select a decoder for a long-term take-home trial with implanted neuromyoelectric devices. Overall, clinical considerations may favor the mKF as it is similar in performance, faster to train, and computationally less expensive than neural networks.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Funding StatementThis work was sponsored by the Hand Proprioception and Touch Interfaces (HAPTIX) program administered by the Biological Technologies Office (BTO) of the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (DARPA) through the Space and Naval Warfare Systems Center, Contract No. N66001-15-C-4017. Research reported in this publication was supported by the National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences of the National Institutes of Health (NIH) under Award Number UL1TR002538 and TL1TR002540. The content is solely the authors' responsibility and does not necessarily represent the official views of DARPA or the NIH.Author DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:University of Utah IRBAll necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.YesAvailable upon reasonable request.EMGelectromyographymKFmodified Kalman filterMLPmulti-layer perceptronCNNconvolutional neural networksEMGsurface electromyographyTLXTask Load Index