Comparing the efficacy of anti□infectious drugs for the treatment of mild to severe COVID-19 patients: a protocol for a systematic review and network meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials - Debela, Dejene Tolossa; Heraro, Kidist Digamo (medRxiv, 2021)
Background COVID-19 is a viral infection spreading at a great speed and has quickly caused an extensive burden to individuals, families, countries, and the world. No intervention has yet been proven highly effective for the treatment of COVID-19. Different drugs were being evaluated and reported through randomized clinical trials, and more are currently under trial. This review aimed to compare the efficacy of anti-infectious drugs with a comparator of the standard of care or placebo in patients with COVID-19.Methods and analysis Two independent review authors will extract data and assess a risk of bias using RoB2. Randomized controlled trials (RCT) that evaluate single and/or combined antiviral drugs recommended by WHO latest guideline for the treatment of COVID-19 will be included. We will search for Pub Med, the Cochrane Center for Clinical Trial database (CENTRAL), clinicaltrials.gov, etc. databases for articles published in the English language between December 2019 to April 2021. We will follow the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Protocols (PRISMA-P) involving Network Meta-analysis guidelines for the design and reporting of the results. The primary endpoints will be time to clinical recovery and time to RNA negativity. The certainty of evidence will be evaluated using the GRADE extension of NMA. Data analysis will be performed using the frequentist NMA approach with netmeta package implemented in R.Ethics and dissemination There are no ethical considerations associated with this study as we will use publicly available data from previously published studies. We plan to publish results in open access peer-reviewed journals.PROSPERO registration number ID=CRD42021230919.Strengths and limitations of this studyThis will be the first systematic review and network meta-analysis to assess the efficacy specific to anti-infectious drugs category for for mild to severe patients of COVID-19.Its compliance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis for Protocols (PRISMA-P) involving network meta-analysis(NMA) will ensure the quality of reporting.Doing both pairwise meta-analysis and network meta-analysis (NMA) can comprehensively analyse direct and indirect comparison results of different anti-infectious drugs for COVID 19 will give more reliable conclusions aswell as the rank of those drugs.There is risk of heterogeneity and inconsistency, given the different anti-infectious drugs that will be included; however, we try to control intransitivity by carefully identifying the eligibility criteria depending on PICOS strategy and assess inconsistency using local as well as global approaches.The limitation of this study is it will not explore the economic benefits of these drugs.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Funding StatementWe got a grant from Addis Ababa University, College of Health Sciences, Center for Innovative Drug Development and Therapeutic Trials for Africa. The funder has no roleAuthor DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:not applicableAll necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.Yesdata is available online