Factors confounding the athlete biological passport: a systematic narrative review - Krumm, Bastien; Faiss, Raphael (medRxiv, 2021)
Background Through longitudinal, individual and adaptive monitoring of blood biomarkers, the haematological module of the athlete biological passport (ABP) has become a valuable tool in anti-doping efforts. The composition of blood as a vector of oxygen in the human body varies in athletes with the influence of multiple intrinsic (genetic) or extrinsic (training or environmental conditions) factors. In this context, it is fundamental to establish a comprehensive understanding of the various causes that may affect blood variables and thereby alter a fair interpretation of ABP profiles.Methods This literature review described the potential factors confounding the ABP to outline influencing factors altering haematological profiles acutely or chronically.Results Our investigation confirmed that natural variations in ABP variables appear relatively small, likely—at least in part—because of strong human homeostasis. Furthermore, the significant effects on haematological variations of environmental conditions (e.g. exposure to heat or hypoxia) remain debatable. The current ABP paradigm seems rather robust in view of the existing literature that aims to delineate adaptive individual limits. Nevertheless, its objective sensitivity may be further improved.Conclusions This narrative review contributes to disentangling the numerous confounding factors of the ABP to gather the available scientific evidence and help interpret individual athlete profiles.Key points Through longitudinal, individual and adaptive monitoring of blood biomarkers, the haematological module of the athlete biological passport (ABP) has become a valuable tool in anti-doping efforts.This literature review described the potential factors confounding the ABP to outline influencing factors altering haematological profiles acutely or chronically.While our results support the current ABP paradigm as rather robust to delineate adaptive individual limits, our work may contribute to disentangling the numerous confounding factors of the ABP to gather the available scientificCompeting Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Funding StatementThe word presented was completed in absence of any external funding or grant.Author DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:The article is a literature review and any ethical board review is not relevant in the context.All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.YesAll data referred to in the manuscript is available on request to the corresponding author.ABPathlete biological passportADAMSAnti-Doping Administration & Management SystemAPMUAthlete Passport Management UnitATPFatypical passport finding[Hb]haemoglobin concentrationHbmasshaemoglobin massHcthaematocritIHEintermittent hypoxic exposureIHTintermittent hypoxic trainingLHTHliving high-training highLHTLliving high-training lowOFFsOFF-ScorePVplasma volumeRet%percentage of reticulocytesWADAWorld Anti-Doping Agency