Face masks to prevent transmission of respiratory diseases: Systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials* - Ollila, Hanna M.; Partinen, Markku; Koskela, Jukka; Savolainen, Riikka; Rotkirch, Anna; Laine, Liisa T. (medRxiv, 2021)
Objective To examine the effect of face mask intervention in respiratory infections across different exposure settings and age groups.Design Systematic review and meta-analysis.Data sources PubMed, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and Web of Science were searched for randomized controlled trials investigating the effect of face masks on respiratory infections published by November 18th, 2020. We followed PRISMA guidelines.Eligibility criteria for selecting studies Randomized controlled trials investigating face masks in respiratory infections across different exposure settings. Two reviewers performed the search, extracted data, and assessed the risk of bias. Random effects meta-analysis with risk ratio, adjusted odds ratios, and number needed to treat were performed. Findings by source control or wearer protection, age groups, exposure settings, and role of non-compliance were evaluated.Results Seventeen studies were included, (N=11,601 cases and N=10,286 controls, follow-up from 4 days to 19 months). Fourteen trials included adults and children and three trials included children only. Twelve studies showed non-compliance in treatment and eleven in control group. Four studies supported the use of face masks. Meta-analysis across all studies with risk ratios found no association with number of infections (RR=0.957 [0.810 - 1.131], p=0.608). Meta-analysis using odds ratios adjusted for age, sex, and vaccination (when available) showed protective effect of face masks (OR=0.850 [0.736 - 0.982], p=0.027). Subgroup meta-analysis with adjusted odds ratios found a decrease in respiratory infections among adults (14 studies, OR = 0.829 [0.709 - 0.969], p=0.019) in source control setting (OR = 0.845 [0.7375 - 0.969], p=0.0159) and when face masks were used together with hand hygiene OR = 0.690 [0.568 - 0.838], p=0.0002). Overall between-study heterogeneity was large also in the subgroup analyses.Conclusion Despite the large between study heterogeneity, compliance bias and differences by environmental settings, the findings support the use of face masks to prevent respiratory infections. PROSPERO registration number CRD42020205523.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Funding StatementOllila and Laine gratefully acknowledge Academy of Finland for funding this research (Award number: 340551 LTL and 340539 HMO). Laine gratefully acknowledges funding from the National Institute on Aging of the National Institutes of Health under Award Number P30AG043073. The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the National Institutes of Health, nor of the Academy of Finland.Author DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:All relevant ethical guidelines have been followed. The study is a meta-analysis of previous results and no additional IRB approval has been sought, or needed, for analysis.All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.YesThe authors confirm that the data supporting the findings of this study are available within the article, and the references 12-28.