RT Journal Article
SR Electronic
T1 Risk of COVID-19 infection and work place exposure of front-line mass media professionals
JF medRxiv
FD Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press
SP 2021.05.06.21256773
DO 10.1101/2021.05.06.21256773
A1 Tahura, Sarabon
A1 Banu, Bilkis
A1 Akter, Nasrin
A1 Hossain, Sarder Mahmud
A1 Mahumud, Rashidul Alam
A1 Ahmed, Md Rishad
YR 2021
UL http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2021/05/11/2021.05.06.21256773.abstract
AB Introduction Mass media plays a crucial role in creating awareness and knowledge sharing in this Corona virus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic. However, the risk of exposure and extent of COVID-19 infection among media professional are less elucidated yet. Therefore, this study was intended to investigate the workplace-related risk of COVID-19 exposure and the association between exposure to COVID-19 and participant’s characteristics, including various forms of respiratory protection for mass-media professionals.Methods This closed web-based cross-sectional survey was conducted among 199 mass-media professionals in Bangladesh by snowball sampling approach. A multivariate logistic regression model was used for the analytical exploration. Adjusted and Unadjusted Odds Ratio (OR) with 95% confidence intervals (95% CI) were calculated for the specified exposures. Chi-square test was used to observe the association. Ethical issues were maintained according to the guidance of the declaration of the Helsinki.Results Of all, 39.2% of mass-media professionals were tested positive for COVID-19, whereas 6% of symptomatic or suspected participants did not do the test. Mass media professionals who worked in electronic media reported more COVID-19 infection (adjusted odds ratio, AOR= 6.25; 95% Confidence interval: Lower limit 1.43, upper limit 27.43; P =0.02). However, no significant relationship was found between the type of job role and COVID-19 infection. Furthermore, infected colleagues (OR/P=1.92/0.04) were identified as significant contact of acquiring infection. However, the study result showed that reused/new medical mask, homemade/cloth-made mask (vs. use of respirator mask) was not significantly (p=0.82) associated with mass media professional’s infection.Conclusions Professionals working in electronic media were at higher risk of being infected by COVID-19 and mostly acquired from infected colleagues. Using a respirator mask was not associated with a lower risk of test positive infection in mass media professionals. This study will aid the policy maker and public health authorities during the COVID-19 pandemic to make proper implementation strategies.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Funding StatementThis was a self-funded study with no external funding support for any aspect of this studyAuthor DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:The study complied with the Declaration of Helsinki and was approved by the Ethical Review Committee, Department of Public Health, Northern University Bangladesh, Dhaka, Bangladesh (memo no. NUB/DPH/EC/2020/05). Participation of the respondents was anonymous and voluntary. Informed consent was sought from the respondents at the beginning point of the survey.All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.YesData and materials supporting our findings in the manuscript will be shared on request.