Alternatives to mental health admissions for children and adolescents experiencing mental health crises: a systematic review of the literature - Clisu, Denisa; Layther, Imogen; Dover, Deborah; Viner, Russell M.; Read, Tina; Cheesman, David; Hodges, Sally; Hudson, Lee D (medRxiv, 2021)
Background Increasingly more children and young people (CYP) present in mental health crises, many being hospitalised due to concerns around illness severity and lack of community services. To release the burden of admission, we systematically reviewed the literature on the effects of proposed alternatives to CYP in crises.Methods Three databases (PsychInfo, PubMed and Web of Science) were searched for peer-reviewed papers in October 2020, with an updated search in May 2021.Results We identified 19 papers of interventions delivered in the emergency department, the home, outside of home but outside of clinics and in hospital clinics. The best evidence came from in-home interventions, in particular multisystemic therapy (MST), which proved to be promising alternatives by improving psychological outcomes and decreasing length of inpatient stay. The quality of included studies was low, with less than half being randomised controlled trials and only half of these at low risk of bias.Conclusions We could not recommend a particular intervention as an alternative to inpatient admission, however our review describes benefits across a range of types of inteventions that might be considered in multi-modal treatments. We also provide recommendations for future research, in particular the evaluation of new interventions as they emerge.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Funding StatementIf published in a peer reviewed journal, Great Ormond Street Hospital Charity will pay for open access for the review. One of the researchers (IL) were funded from a grant from Great Ormond Street Hospital Charity for a stream of work looking at the evidence around mental health admissions for children and young people.Author DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:This was a systematic review and therefore ethical permission was not sought.All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.YesThis is a systematic review, we are willing to share studies found.