Measuring post-discharge socioeconomic and quality of life outcomes in trauma patients: A scoping review - David, Siddarth; Roy, Nobhojit; Solomon, Harris; Lundborg, Cecilia Stålsby; Wärnberg, Martin Gerdin (medRxiv, 2021)
Purpose Managing trauma is a global public health challenge. Measuring post-discharge socioeconomic and quality-of-life outcomes can help better understand and reduce the consequences of trauma.Methods We performed a scoping review to map the existing research on post-discharge outcomes for trauma patients, irrespective of the country or setting in which the study was performed. The scoping review was conducted by searching six databases: MEDLINE, EMBASE, the Cochrane Library, Global Index Medicus, BASE, and Web of Science to identify all articles that report post-discharge socioeconomic or quality of life outcomes in trauma patients from 2009 to 2018.Results 758 articles were included in this study, extracting 958 outcomes. Most studies (82%) were from high-income countries (HICs). More studies from low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) were cross-sectional (71%) compared with HIC settings (46%). There was a wide variety of different definitions, interpretations, and measurements used by various articles for similar outcomes. Quality of life, return to work, social support, cost, and participation were the main outcomes studied in post-discharge trauma patients.Conclusions The wide range of outcomes and outcome measures reported across different types of injuries and settings. This variability can be a barrier when comparing across different types of injuries and settings. Post-discharge trauma studies should move towards building evidence based on standardized measurement of outcomes.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Clinical TrialCRD42018103940Clinical Protocols https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?RecordID=103940 Funding StatementThe study was part of the Trauma Audit Filter Trials (TAFT) Project at Doctors For You, India funded by a grant from the Swedish Research Council. The funders had no say in the planning or outputs of this study.Author DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:This study was scoping review and did not involve participants directly, therefore did not require in ethics approval and consent.All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.YesSearch strategy included in supplementary materials