Rising Through the Pandemic: A scoping review of quality improvement in public health during the COVID-19 pandemic - Yin, X. Cindy; Pang, Michelle; Law, Madelyn; Guerra, Fiona; O’Sullivan, Tracey; Laxer, Rachel E.; Schwartz, Brian; Khan, Yasmin (medRxiv, 2021)
Background The COVID-19 pandemic generated a growing interest in and need for evidence-based tools to facilitate the implementation of emergency management strategies within public health practice. Quality improvement (QI) has been identified as a key framework and philosophy to guide organizational emergency response efforts; however, the nature and extent to which it has been used in public health settings during the COVID-19 pandemic remains unclear.Methods We conducted a scoping review of literature published January 2020 – February 2021 and focused on the topic of QI at public health agencies during the COVID-19 pandemic. The search was conducted on four bibliographic databases, in addition to a supplementary grey literature search using custom Google search engines and targeted website search methods. Of the 1,878 peer-reviewed articles assessed, 15 records met the inclusion criteria. An additional 11 relevant records were identified during the grey literature search, for a total of 26 records included in the scoping review.Results Records were organized into five topics: 1) collaborative problem solving and analysis with stakeholders; 2) supporting learning and capacity building in QI; 3) learning from past emergencies; 4) implementing QI methods during COVID-19; and 5) evaluating performance using frameworks/indicators.Conclusions The literature indicates that QI-oriented activities are occurring at the organizational and program levels to enhance COVID-19 response. To optimize the benefits that QI approaches and methodologies may offer, it is important for public health agencies to focus on both widespread integration of QI as part of an organization’s management philosophy and culture, as well as project level activities at all stages of the emergency management cycle.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Funding StatementThis work was supported by funding received from the Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR) Project Grant (funding reference #: 165870).Author DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:Public Health OntarioAll necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.YesData available within the article or its supplementary materials.AARAfter-action reviewCDCUS Centers for Disease Control and PreventionECDCEuropean Centre for Disease Prevention and ControlGHSGlobal Health SecurityIARIn/intra-action reviewLHOLocal health officersNHSUK National Health ServiceOECDOrganisation for Economic Co-operation and DevelopmentPDSAPlan-Do-Study-ActPHEMPublic health emergency managementQIQuality improvementSWOTStrengths, weaknesses, opportunities, threatsUKUnited KingdomUSUnited StatesWHOWorld Health Organization