Respiratory syncytial virus-specific immunoglobulin G (IgG) concentrations associate with environmental and genetic factors: the Factors Influencing Pediatric Asthma Study - Erdei, Esther; Torgerson, Dara; O’Leary, Rae; Spear, Melissa; Shedden, Matias; O’Leary, Marcia; Enright, Kendra; Best, Lyle (medRxiv, 2021)
Exposure to respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) during childhood is nearly ubiquitous by age two, and infants who develop severe RSV bronchiolitis are more likely to develop asthma later in life. In the Factors Influencing Pediatric Asthma (FIPA) study including 319 children from a Northern Plains American Indian community, we found 73% of children to have high concentrations of RSV-specific IgG (>40 IU/mL). High concentration of RSV-specific IgG was associated with increased exposure to second-hand tobacco smoke (p=7.5×10−4), larger household size (p=4.0×10−3), and lower levels of total serum IgE (p=5.1×10−3). Parents of children with asthma more often reported an RSV diagnosis and/or hospitalization due to RSV, and children with asthma had lower concentrations of RSV IgG as compared to those without asthma among RSV-exposed individuals (mean 117 IU/mL vs. 154, p=7.1×10−4). However, lower RSV IgG was surprisingly exclusive to children with asthma recruited during the winter months when RSV is thought to circulate more broadly. Multivariate regression indicated the strongest predictors of RSV-specific IgG concentration included asthma status (p=0.040), per cent eosinophils (p=0.035), and an asthma x RSV season interaction (p=3.7×10−3). Among candidate genes, we identified a genetic association between an intronic variant in IFNL4 and RSV-specific IgG concentration whereby the minor allele (A) was associated with higher concentration (rs12979860, p=4.3×10−3). Overall our findings suggest there are seasonal differences in immunological response to RSV infection in asthma cases vs. controls, and identify both environmental and genetic contributions that warrant further investigation.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Funding StatementFunding was provided by the National Institute of Minority Health and Health Disparities, grant U54 MD008164.Author DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:The research protocol was approved by the Institutional Review Boards at the Collaborative Research Center for American Indian Health, Sanford Research, Sioux Falls, SD; the Great Plains Indian Health Service IRB, Aberdeen, SD and the local Tribal government. All participants parents/guardians gave informed consent in writing and all children provided assent.All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.YesThe data underlying the results of this study are owned and controlled by the Tribal entity that approved its collection. This fact is clearly stated in the Tribal resolution authorizing the research; and it must be recognized that this Tribal community is an independent, sovereign government, in control over research activities within their borders. Access to data and materials is accomplished by application to Dr. Lyle Best, who will arrange for further consultation with the appropriate Tribal partners. Approximately 2 to 3 months may be required. The authors received special access privileges to the data due to their relationship with the Tribal Government, however, interested researchers who apply for data access will be able to access the same data as the authors.