PT  - JOURNAL ARTICLE
AU  - Mishra, Shreya
AU  - Awasthi, Raghav
AU  - Papay, Frank
AU  - Maheshawari, Kamal
AU  - Cywinski, Jacek B
AU  - Khanna, Ashish
AU  - Mathur, Piyush
TI  - DiagnosisQA: A semi-automated pipeline for developing clinician validated diagnosis specific QA datasets
AID  - 10.1101/2021.11.10.21266184
DP  - 2021 Jan 01
TA  - medRxiv
PG  - 2021.11.10.21266184
4099  - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2021/11/11/2021.11.10.21266184.short
4100  - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2021/11/11/2021.11.10.21266184.full
AB  - Question answering (QA) is one of the oldest research areas of AI and Computational Linguistics. QA has seen significant progress with the development of state-of-the-art models and benchmark datasets over the last few years. However, pre-trained QA models perform poorly for clinical QA tasks, presumably due to the complexity of electronic healthcare data. With the digitization of healthcare data and the increasing volume of unstructured data, it is extremely important for healthcare providers to have a mechanism to query the data to find appropriate answers. Since diagnosis is central to any decision-making for the clinicians and patients, we have created a pipeline to develop diagnosis-specific QA datasets and curated a QA database for the Cerebrovascular Accident (CVA). CVA, also commonly known as Stroke, is an important and commonly occurring diagnosis amongst critically ill patients. Our method when compared to clinician validation achieved an accuracy of 0.90(with 90% CI [0.82,0.99]). Using our method, we hope to overcome the key challenges of building and validating a highly accurate QA dataset in a semiautomated manner which can help improve performance of QA models.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Funding StatementThis study did not receive any funding Author DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:https://physionet.org/content/mimiciii-demo/1.4/I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.YesData is publicly available at https://physionet.org/content/mimiciii-demo/1.4/ https://physionet.org/content/mimiciii-demo/1.4/