PT - JOURNAL ARTICLE AU - Valentine, Sophie AU - Klasmer, Benjamin AU - Dabbah, Mohammad AU - Balabanovic, Marko AU - Plans, David TI - Smartphone Movement Sensors for Remote Monitoring of Respiratory Rate: Observational Study AID - 10.1101/2021.12.03.21267247 DP - 2021 Jan 01 TA - medRxiv PG - 2021.12.03.21267247 4099 - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2021/12/05/2021.12.03.21267247.short 4100 - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2021/12/05/2021.12.03.21267247.full AB - Background Mobile health offers potential benefits to patients and healthcare systems alike. Existing remote technologies to measure respiratory rate (RR) have limitations, such as cost, accessibility and reliability. Using smartphone sensors to measure RR may offer a potential solution.Objective The aim of this study was to conduct a comprehensive assessment of a novel mHealth smartphone application designed to measure RR using movement sensors.Methods In Study 1, 15 participants simultaneously measured their RR with the app, and an FDA cleared reference device. A novel reference method to allow the app to be evaluated ‘in the wild’ was also developed. In Study 2, 165 participants measured their RR using the app, and these measures were compared to the novel reference. Usability of the app was also assessed in both studies.Results The app, when compared to the FDA-cleared and novel references, respectively, showed a mean absolute error (MAE) of 1.65 (SD=1.49) and 1.14 (1.44), relative MAE of 12.2 (9.23) and 9.5 (18.70) and bias of 0.81 (limits of agreement (LoA) =-3.27-4.89) and 0.08 (−3.68-3.51). Pearson correlation coefficients were 0.700 and 0.885. 93% of participants successfully operated the app on their first use.Conclusions The accuracy and usability of the app demonstrated here show promise for the use of mHealth solutions employing smartphone sensors to remotely monitor RR. Further research should validate the benefits that this technology may offer patients and healthcare systems.Competing Interest StatementAll authors are current or previous employees of Huma Therapeutics Ltd, which is the developer of the mHealth smartphone app. No additional conflicts of interest relevant to this study are declared.Funding StatementThis study was funded by Huma Therapeutics Ltd.Author DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:Ethical approval was provided by the University of Exeter's Research Ethics Board (application ID eUEBS004088) and all research was conducted in compliance with the Declaration of Helsinki. I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.YesAll data produced in the present study are available upon reasonable request to the authorsAbbreviationsappsapplicationsBPMbreaths per minuteFDAUS Food and Drug AdministrationHCPhealthcare professionalLoALimits of agreementMAEmean absolute error mHealth mobile healthPPMCPearson Product Moment CorrelatioRRrespiratory rateSDstandard deviationSUSSystem Usability Scale