RT Journal Article
SR Electronic
T1 Predicting risk of pancreatic cancer in individuals with new-onset type-2 diabetes in primary care: protocol for the development and validation of a clinical prediction model (QPancreasD)
JF medRxiv
FD Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press
SP 2021.12.22.21268161
DO 10.1101/2021.12.22.21268161
A1 Tan, Pui San
A1 Clift, Ashley Kieran
A1 Liao, Weiqi
A1 Patone, Martina
A1 Coupland, Carol
A1 Bashford-Rogers, Rachael
A1 Sivakumar, Shivan
A1 Clifton, David
A1 Pereira, Stephen P
A1 Hippisley-Cox, Julia
YR 2021
UL http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2021/12/27/2021.12.22.21268161.abstract
AB Background Pancreatic cancer continues to have an extremely poor prognosis in part due to late diagnosis. 25% of pancreatic cancer patients have a prior diagnosis of diabetes, and hence identifying individuals at risk of pancreatic cancer in those with recently diagnosed type 2 diabetes may be a useful opportunity to identify candidates for screening and early detection. In this study, we will comparatively evaluate regression and machine learning-based clinical prediction models for estimating individual risk of developing pancreatic cancer two years after type 2 diabetes diagnosis.Methods In the development dataset, we will include adults aged 30-84 years with incident type-2 diabetes registered with QResearch primary care database. Patients will be followed up from type-2 diabetes diagnosis to first diagnosis of pancreatic cancer as recorded in any one of primary care records, hospital episode statistics, cancer registry data, or death records. Cox-proportional hazards models will be used to develop a risk prediction model for estimating individual risk of developing pancreatic cancer during up to 2 years of follow-up. We will perform variable selection using a combination of clinical and statistical significance approach i.e. HR <0.9 or >1.1 and p<0.01. Linear predictors and baseline survivor function at 2 years will be used to compute absolute risk predictions.Internal-external cross-validation (IECV) framework across geographical regions within England will be used to assess performance and pooled using random effects meta-analysis using: (i) model fit in terms of variation explained by the model Royston & Sauerbrei’s R2D, (ii) calibration slope and calibration-in-the-large, and (iii) discrimination measured in terms of Harrell’s C and Royston & Sauerbrei’s D-statistic.Further, we will evaluate machine learning (ML) approaches for the clinical prediction model using neural networks (NN) and XGBoost. The model predictors and performance of these will be compared with the results of those derived from the regression-based strategy.Discussion The proposed study will develop and validate a novel risk prediction model to aid early diagnosis of pancreatic cancer in patients with new-onset diabetes in primary care. With an enhanced decision-risk tool for use at point-of care by general practitioners to assess pancreatic cancer risk, it may improve decision-making so that at-risk patients are rapidly prioritised to aid early diagnosis of pancreatic cancer in patients with newly diagnosed diabetes.Competing Interest StatementJHC is an unpaid director of QResearch, a not-for-profit organisation which is a partnership between the University of Oxford and EMIS Health who supply the QResearch database used for this work. JHC is a founder and shareholder of ClinRisk Ltd and was its medical director until 31st May 2019. ClinRisk Ltd produces open and closed source software to implement clinical risk algorithms (including the original development of pancreatic cancer prediction algorithms) into clinical computer systems. CC reports previous consultancy with ClinRisk Ltd outside the current work. AKC reports consulting fees from Mendelian, outside the scope of the current work. PST reports previous consultation with AstraZeneca and Duke-NUS outside the current work.Funding StatementThis project is funded by Pancreatic Cancer UK. AKC is supported by a Clinical Research Training Fellowship from Cancer Research UK (grant number C2195/A31310). JHC reports grants from National Institute for Health Research (NIHR), NIHR Biomedical Research Centre, Oxford, grants from John Fell Oxford University Press Research Fund, grants from Cancer Research UK (CR-UK) grant number C5255/A18085, through the Cancer Research UK Oxford Centre, grants from the Oxford Wellcome Institutional Strategic Support Fund (204826/Z/16/Z) and other research councils, during the conduct of the study. SPP is supported by the National Institute for Health Research University College London Hospitals Biomedical Research Centre.Author DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:This study has been independently peer-reviewed and received ethics approval by the QResearch Scientific board (18/EM/0400; project reference OX153).I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.YesTo guarantee the confidentiality of personal and health information, only the authors will have access to the data during the study in accordance with the relevant license and data sharing agreements. Access to QResearch data is according to the information on the QResearch website https://www.qresearch.org