RT Journal Article
SR Electronic
T1 Machine learning based preoperative analytics for the prediction of anastomotic insufficiency in colorectal surgery: a single-centre pilot study
JF medRxiv
FD Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press
SP 2021.12.11.21267569
DO 10.1101/2021.12.11.21267569
A1 Taha-Mehlitz, Stephanie
A1 Wentzler, Larissa
A1 Angehrn, Fiorenzo
A1 Hendie, Ahmad
A1 Ochs, Vincent
A1 Staartjes, Victor E.
A1 Flüe, Markus von
A1 Taha, Anas
A1 Steinemann, Daniel
YR 2022
UL http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2022/01/13/2021.12.11.21267569.abstract
AB Introduction Anastomotic insufficiency (AI) is a relatively common but grave complication after colorectal surgery. This study aims to determine whether AI can be predicted from simple preoperative data using machine learning (ML) algorithms.Methods and analysis In this retrospective analysis, patients undergoing colorectal surgery with creation of a bowel anastomosis from the University Hospital of Basel were included. Data was split into a training set (80%) and a test set (20%). The group of patients with AI was oversampled to a ratio of 50:50 in the training set and missing values were imputed. Known predictors of AI were included as inputs: age, BMI, smoking status, the Charlson Comorbidity Index, the American Society of Anesthesiologists score, type of operation, indication, haemoglobin and albumin levels, and renal function.Results Of the 593 included patients, 88 experienced AI. At internal validation on unseen patients from the test set, area under the curve (AUC) was 0.61 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.44-0.79), calibration slope was 0.16 (95% CI: −0.06-0.39) and calibration intercept was 0.06 (95% CI: 0.02-0.11). We observed a specificity of 0.67 (95% CI: 0.58-0.76), sensitivity of 0.36 (95% CI: 0.08-0.67), and accuracy of 0.64 (95% CI: 0.55-0.72).Conclusion By using 10 patient-related risk factors associated with AI, we demonstrate the feasibility of ML-based prediction of AI after colorectal surgery. Nevertheless, it is crucial to include multicenter data and higher sample sizes to develop a robust and generalisable model, which will subsequently allow for deployment of the algorithm in a web-based application.Strengths and limitations of this studyTo the best of our knowledge, this is the first study to establish a risk prediction model for anastomotic insufficiency in a perioperative setting in colon surgery.Data from all patients that underwent colon surgery within 8 years at University Hospital Basel were included.We evaluated the feasibility of developing a machine learning model that predicts the outcome by using well-known risk factors for anastomotic insufficiency.Although our model showed promising results, it is crucial to validate our findings externally before clinical practice implications are possible.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Funding StatementThis study did not receive any fundingAuthor DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:The study was approved by the Northwestern and Central Ethics Committee Switzerland (BASEC-Nr 2020-02265).I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.YesAll data produced in the present study are available upon reasonable request to the authors.