Reevaluation of Seroprevalence using a Semi-quantitative Anti-spike IgG in Health Care workers at an Academic Medical Center in Boston, Massachusetts - Cole, Manisha; Duffy, Elizabeth R.; Osterland, Jordyn N; Gawel, Susan; Ye, Lei; de la Cena, Kyle; Ragan, Elizabeth J.; Weber, Sarah E.; M- Schechter-Perkins, Elissa; Bouton, Tara C.; Jacobson, Karen R.; Andry, Chris; et al. (medRxiv, 2022)
Background Accurate measurement of antibodies is a necessary tool for assessing exposure to SARS-CoV-2 and facilitating understanding of the role of antibodies in immunity. Most assays are qualitative in nature and employ a threshold to determine presence of antibodies. Semi-quantitative assays are now available. Here we evaluate the semi-quantitative SARS-CoV-2 IgG II (anti-spike (S)) assay. We aim to reassess the seroprevalence using anti-S assay and subsequently compare it to the previously measured IgG (anti-nucleoprotein (N)) in health care workers at an academic medical center in Boston.Methods 1743 serum samples from HCWs at Boston Medical Center were analyzed for SARS-CoV-2 anti-S IgG and IgM using the Abbott SARS-CoV-2 IgG II and□Abbott AdviseDx□SARS-CoV-2 IgM assay, respectively. Precision, linearity, positive and negative concordance with prior RT-PCR test were evaluated for anti-S IgG. Seroprevalence and its association with demographics variables was also assessed.Results Linearity and precision results were clinically acceptable. The positive and negative concordance for anti-S IgG with RT-PCR was 88.2% (95% CI: 79.4% - 94.2%) and 97.43% (95% CI: 95.2% - 98.8%), respectively. Overall, 126 (7.2%) of 1,743 participants were positive by anti-S IgG. Among the 1302 participants with no prior RT-PCR, 40 (3.1%) were positive for anti-S IgG antibody. The original agreement in this population with the qualitative, anti-N IgG assay was 70.6%. Upon optimizing the threshold from 1.4 to 0.49 S/CO of the anti-N IgG assay, the positive agreement of the assay increases to 84.7%.Conclusion The anti-S IgG assay demonstrated reproducible and reliable measurements. This study highlights the presence of asymptomatic transmission among individuals with no prior history of positive RT-PCR. It also highlights the need for optimizing thresholds of the qualitative SARS-CoV-2 IgG assay for better agreement between assays by the same vendor.Competing Interest StatementAbbott Diagnostics provided the reagents for the SARS-CoV-2 IgG II assays.Funding StatementThe study was funded, in part, by BMC Development Philanthropy Funds for COVID-19 research. Abbott Diagnostics provided the reagents for the SARS-CoV-2 IgG II assays.Author DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:This project was approved by the Institutional Review Board at Boston University Medical Center (BUMC).I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.YesAll data produced in the present study are available upon reasonable request to the corresponding author.