Presentation collateral patterns and outcomes after endovascular thrombectomy for large vessel occlusion stroke - Regenhardt, Robert W; Lev, Michael H; He, Julian; Dmytriw, Adam A; Vranic, Justin E; Rabinov, James D; Stapleton, Christopher J; Patel, Aman B; Singhal, Aneesh B; Gonzalez, R Gilberto (medRxiv, 2022)
Background Endovascular thrombectomy (EVT) revolutionized large vessel occlusion (LVO) stroke. However, treatment decisions and prognostication are challenging without advanced imaging. We sought to determine the relationship of simple CTA collateral patterns and outcomes after EVT.Methods We identified patients with anterior LVO who underwent guideline based EVT from a single center from 2019-2020. Inclusion criteria were available CTA and 90-day modified Rankin Scale (mRS). Arterial-phase CTA collaterals were categorized as malignant, other, or symmetric.Results Among 74 patients, the median age was 75 and 49% were female. Collaterals were symmetric (36%), malignant (24%), or other (39%). Comparing collateral patterns there were no differences in demographics, presentations, time from last well, good reperfusion, or intracerebral hemorrhage. Median NIHSS was 18 for malignant, 19 for other, and 11 for symmetric (p=0.02). Intracranial ICA occlusions were present in 28% of malignant, 3% of other, and 11% of symmetric (p=0.04). Ninety-day mRS ≤2 was achieved in 17% of malignant, 38% of other, and 67% of symmetric. Collateral pattern was a significant determinant of 90-day mRS ≤2 (aOR=6.62, 95%CI=2.24,19.53; p=0.001) in a multivariable model including age, NIHSS, baseline mRS, thrombolysis, LVO location, and good reperfusion.Conclusions Simple CTA collateral pattern is a robust determinant of 90-day outcomes after EVT. Further prospective studies are needed to understand how collateral pattern can guide EVT treatment decisions and long-term prognosis.Competing Interest StatementRWR (R25NS065743), RGG (U01EB025153), and ABS (U24NS107243, U01NS095869, R01NS105875, R01NS051412, P50NS051343) have been supported by the National Institutes of Health, National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke. MHL has been a consultant for Takeda Pharm and GE Healthcare, and has received an institutional research grant from GE Healthcare. ABP has been a consultant for Penumbra, Medtronic, and Microvention. There are no other relevant competing interests.Funding StatementRWR (R25NS065743), RGG (U01EB025153), and ABS (U24NS107243, U01NS095869, R01NS105875, R01NS051412, P50NS051343) have been supported by the National Institutes of Health, National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke.Author DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:The institutional review board of Massachusetts General Hospital gave ethical approval for this work.I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.YesThe data supporting these findings will be made available upon reasonable request and pending approval of the local institutional review board.