Disentangling “Bayesian brain” theories of autism spectrum disorder - Schneebeli, Maya; Haker, Helene; Rüesch, Annia; Zahnd, Nicole; Marino, Stephanie; Paolini, Gina; Iglesias, Sandra; Petzschner, Frederike H.; Stephan, Klaas Enno (medRxiv, 2022)
Background Bayesian theories of perception have provided a variety of alternative mechanistic explanations for autistic symptoms, including (1) overprecise sensations, (2) imprecise priors, (3) inflexible priors, and (4) altered hierarchical learning. Here, we designed a set of experiments to systematically test predictions from each of the four hypotheses in individuals with autism spectrum disorder (ASD).Methods Two versions of a two-alternative forced-choice (2AFC) random dot motion task were developed to disentangle the influence of sensory inputs and prior expectations and test implications of the four Bayesian hypotheses. Using a cross-sectional observational study design, behavioural data were obtained from participants with autism spectrum disorder (N=47) and a control group (N=50). Analyses used mixed effects models and a drift diffusion model.Results Contrary to the sensory overprecision hypothesis, individuals with ASD did not differ from controls in performance or parameter estimates during the perceptual 2AFC task. When adding cues to the task, individuals with ASD profited less from this prior information than controls, as predicted by the imprecise prior hypothesis. However, individuals with ASD were still able to update their initial priors, contradicting the inflexible prior hypothesis. Finally, in line with the hierarchical learning hypothesis, volatility differentially modulated expectation effects, exerting a significantly smaller effect in the ASD group compared to the control group.Conclusion Our findings support two mutually compatible alterations of perception in ASD (imprecise priors and, to a lesser degree, altered hierarchical learning). By contrast, they are not compatible with the notions of sensory overprecision and inflexible priors.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Funding StatementThis study was financially supported by the Stiftung Netzwerk Schizophrenie (HH), the Rene and Susanne Braginsky Foundation (KES) and the University of Zurich (KES).Author DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:The study was approved by the cantonal ethics committee of the canton Zurich (BASEC-Nr: 2016-0838)I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.YesThe analysis code can be accessed on the GitLab repository of ETH Zurich (https://gitlab.ethz.ch/tnu/code/schneebelietal_biasd_mdt). Upon acceptance in a peer-reviewed journal, the anonymized data will be made available in the ETH Research Collection (https://www.research-collection.ethz.ch/), a freely accessible scientific repository that complies with the FAIR principles42.2AFCTwo-alternative forced choiceAGASD groupAQAutism quotientASDautism spectrum disorderASD-IAutism spectrum disorder interviewBDTblock design taskBIASDBayesian inference in autism spectrum disorder projectCIconfidence intervalCGcontrol groupCMDTcued motion discrimination taskCSIcue-stimulus intervald2-Rd2 revised (attention test)DDMdrift diffusion modelDSSTdigital symbol substitution testESeffect sizeGLMMgeneralized linear mixed effects modelITIinter-stimulus intervalNCMDTnon-cued motion discrimination taskRTreaction timeWFPTWiener first passage time