RT Journal Article
SR Electronic
T1 Remote exposure to secondhand tobacco smoke is associated with lower exercise capacity through effects on oxygen pulse, a proxy of cardiac stroke volume
JF medRxiv
FD Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press
SP 2021.05.29.21258054
DO 10.1101/2021.05.29.21258054
A1 Zeng, Siyang
A1 Dunn, Michelle
A1 Gold, Warren M
A1 Kizer, Jorge
A1 Arjomandi, Mehrdad
YR 2022
UL http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2022/02/23/2021.05.29.21258054.abstract
AB Background Past exposure to secondhand tobacco smoke (SHS) is associated with exercise limitation. Pulmonary factors including air trapping contribute to this limitation but the contribution of cardiovascular factors is unclear.Objective To determine contribution of cardiovascular mechanisms to SHS-associated exercise limitation.Methods We examined the cardiovascular responses to maximum effort exercise in 245 never-smokers with remote, prolonged occupational exposure to SHS and no known history of cardiovascular disease. We estimated the contribution of oxygen-pulse (proxy for cardiac stroke volume) and changes in systolic (SBP) and diastolic blood pressures (DBP) and heart rate (HR) towards exercise capacity, and examined whether the association of SHS with exercise capacity was mediated through these variables.Results At peak exercise (highest workload completed [WattsPeak]=156±46 watts [135±33 %predicted]), oxygen consumption (VO2Peak) and oxygen-pulse (O2-PulsePeak) were 1,557±476 mL/min (100±24 %predicted) and 11.0±3.0 mL/beat (116±25 %predicted), respectively, with 29% and 3% participants not achieving their predicted normal range. Oxygen saturation at peak exercise was 98±1% and remained >93% in all participants. Sixty-six percent showed hypertensive response to exercise. In models adjusted for covariates, WattsPeak was associated directly with O2-PulsePeak, HRPeak, and SBPPeak and inversely with SHS, air trapping (RV/TLC), and rise of SBP over workload (all P<0.01). Moreover, SHS exposure association with WattsPeak was substantially (41%) mediated through its effect on O2-PulsePeak (P<0.038). Although not statistically significant, a considerable proportion (36%) of air trapping effect on WattsPeak seemed to be mediated through O2-PulsePeak (P=0.078). The likelihood of having baseline respiratory symptoms (modified Medical Research Council score ≥1) was associated with steeper rise in SBP over workload (P<0.01).Conclusion In a never-smoker population with remote exposure to SHS, abnormal escalation of afterload and an SHS-associated reduction in cardiac output contributed to lower exercise capacity.What is the key question?What are the cardiovascular health effects of past exposure to secondhand tobacco smoke in never-smokers? How do pulmonary and cardiovascular systems interact in this setting?What is the bottom line?Healthy never-smokers with history of remote past exposure to secondhand tobacco smoke have an abnormal cardiovascular response to exercise, which is characterized by a stroke volume and thus an exercise capacity that are reduced proportional to their years of exposure to secondhand tobacco smoke.Why read on?The abnormal cardiovascular response to exercise in this population reveals the presence of an occult or subclinical pathology that impairs the cardiopulmonary functional reserve and reduces the efficiency of body’s oxygen delivery machinery, which could be disadvantageous during the times of increased cardiopulmonary output demands as in physiological distress or disease.Competing Interest StatementThis work was supported by: 1.Flight Attendant Medical Research Institute (FAMRI) (012500WG and CIA190001 to MA). 2.California Tobacco-Related Disease Research Program (TRDRP) (T29IR0715 to MA). 3.The Department of Veterans Affairs (CXV-00125 to MA). 4.National Library of Medicine Training Grant (NIH: T15LM007442 to SZ) The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript. The statements and conclusions in this publication are those of the authors and not necessarily those of the funding agency. The mention of commercial products, their source, or their use in connection with the material reported herein is not to be construed as an actual or implied endorsement of such products.Funding StatementThis work was supported by: 1.Flight Attendant Medical Research Institute (FAMRI) (012500WG and CIA190001 to MA). 2.California Tobacco-Related Disease Research Program (TRDRP) (T29IR0715 to MA). 3.The Department of Veterans Affairs (CXV-00125 to MA). 4.National Library of Medicine Training Grant (NIH: T15LM007442 to SZ) Author DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:The UCSF Institutional Review Board (IRB) and the San Francisco VA Medical Center Committee on Research and Development approved study protocols. Written IRB-approved informed consent and Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA) were obtained from all study participants. Subjects received monetary compensation for their participation in the study.I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.YesData