PT  - JOURNAL ARTICLE
AU  - Odenbach, Jeffrey
AU  - Dhanoa, Sumeet
AU  - Sebastianski, Meghan
AU  - Milovanovic, Lazar
AU  - Robinson, Andrea
AU  - Mah, Graham
AU  - Rewa, Oleksa G.
AU  - Bagshaw, Sean M.
AU  - Buchanan, Brian
AU  - Lau, Vincent I.
TI  - Acute respiratory distress syndrome and shunt detection with bubble studies: a systematic review and meta-analysis
AID  - 10.1101/2022.08.02.22278344
DP  - 2022 Jan 01
TA  - medRxiv
PG  - 2022.08.02.22278344
4099  - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2022/08/03/2022.08.02.22278344.short
4100  - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2022/08/03/2022.08.02.22278344.full
AB  - Objectives Acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) is a life-threatening respiratory injury with multiple physiological sequalae. Shunting of deoxygenated blood through intra and extra-pulmonary shunts is one consequence that may complicate ARDS management. Therefore, we conducted a systematic review to determine the prevalence of sonographically detected shunt and its association with oxygenation and mortality in patients with ARDS.Data Sources We searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane Library and DARE databases on March 26, 2021Study Selection Articles relating to respiratory failure and sonographic shunt detection.Data Extraction Articles were independently screened and extracted in duplicate. Data pertaining to study demographics and shunt detection were compiled for mortality and oxygenation outcomes. Risk of bias was appraised using the Joanna Briggs Institute and Newcastle-Ottawa Scale tools with evidence rating certainty using GRADE methodology.Data Synthesis From 4,617 citations, 10 observational studies met eligibility criteria. Sonographic detection of right-to-left shunt was present in 21.8% of patients (range:14.4-30.0%) amongst included studies using transthoracic, transesophageal and transcranial bubble Doppler sonography. Shunt prevalence may be associated with increased mortality (risk ratio: 1.22, 95% CI: 1.01-1.49, p=0.04, very low certainty evidence) with no difference in oxygenation as measured by PaO2:FiO2 ratio (mean difference -0.7, 95% CI: -18.6 to 17.2, p=0.94, very low certainty evidence).Conclusions Intra- and extra-pulmonary shunts are detected frequently in ARDS with ultrasound techniques. Shunts may increase mortality amongst patients with ARDS, but its association with oxygenation is uncertain. Future research should explore the role of shunt in ARDS, their association with mortality, and whether targeted precision medicine interventions can improve outcomes.PROSPERO Registration Number: CRD42021245194 (March 26, 2021)Key PointsQuestion: In adult critically ill ARDS patients, what is the prevalence of right-to-left shunts, and what are their effects on mortality and/or oxygenation?Findings: In this systematic review and meta-analysis, shunts be may prevalent in ∼1 in 5 ARDS patients. They may be associated with a statistically significant increase in mortality, with no difference in oxygenation parameters.Meaning: Intra- and extra-pulmonary shunts are detected frequently in ARDS with ultrasound techniques, and may increase mortality amongst patients with ARDS (although its association with oxygenation is uncertain).Competing Interest StatementNone of the authors disclose any competing interests. Dr. Bagshaw is supported by a Canada Research Chair in Critical Care Outcomes and Systems Evaluation.Funding StatementThere was no funding for this research.Author DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesI confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.YesAll data produced in the present work are contained in the manuscript